Adjuvant irradiation after resection of brain metastases reduces the risk of local recurrence. Whole-brain radiation therapy can be associated with significant neurotoxicity in long-term survivors of brain metastases. This retrospective study evaluates the role of tumor bed stereotactic radiosurgery as an alternative method of irradiation after initial resection of brain metastases to prevent local recurrence. Forty patients underwent tumor bed radiosurgery after resection of brain metastases at two separate academic medical centers. The median age was 59.5 years. Twenty patients (67.5%) had single metastases. Resection was complete in 80% and partial in 20% of the patients. At the time of radiosurgery, systemic disease was active in 57.5%, inactive in 32.5%, and in remission in 10% of the patients. The median Karnofsky Performance Scale score was 80% (range, 60-100%). Radiosurgery was performed a median of 4 weeks after tumor resection. The median cavity radiosurgery volume was 9.1 ml (range, 0.6-39.9 ml). The median margin and maximum radiation dose were 16 and 32 Gy, respectively. Local control at the resection site was achieved in 73% of patients at a median follow-up period of 13 months. No variable significantly affected local control. New remote brain metastases occurred in 54% of the patients. Symptomatic radiation effect was seen in 5.4% of the patients. The median survival was 13 months after radiosurgery (range, 2-56 mo). Tumor bed radiosurgery provides effective local control of the tumor after resection in most patients. These preliminary data support radiosurgery after resection rather than traditional radiation therapy.

Object: Optimal case management after surgical removal of brain metastasis remains controversial. Although postoperative whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) has been shown to prevent local recurrence and decrease deaths, this modality can substantially decrease neurocognitive function and quality of life. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) can theoretically achieve the same level of local control with fewer side effects, although studies conclusively demonstrating such outcomes are lacking. To assess the effectiveness and safety profile of tumor bed SRS after resection of brain metastasis, the authors performed a retrospective analysis of 110 patients who had received such treatment at the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke. They designed the study to identify risk factors for local recurrence and placed special emphasis on factors that could potentially be addressed.Methods: Patients who had received treatment from 2004 through 2013 were included if they had undergone surgical removal of 1 or more brain metastases and if the tumor bed was treated by SRS regardless of the extent of resection or prior WBRT. All cases were retrospectively analyzed for patient and tumor-specific factors, treatment protocol, adverse outcomes, cavity outcomes, and survival for as long as follow-up was available. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors for local recurrence and predictors of increased survival times.Results: Median patient age at first SRS treatment was 58 years (range 37–84 years). The most frequently diagnosed primary tumor was non–small cell lung cancer. The rate of gross-total resection was 81%. The median Karnofsky Performance Scale score was 90%. Tumor bed SRS was performed at a median of 3 weeks after surgery. Median follow-up and survival times were 10 and 11 months, respectively. Actuarial local control of the cavity at 12 months was 73%; median time to recurrence was 6 months. According to multivariate analysis, risk factors for recurrence were a longer surgery-to-SRS delay (HR 1.625, p = 0.003) and a lower maximum radiation dose delivered to the cavity (HR 0.817, p = 0.006). Factors not associated with increased recurrence were subtotal or piecemeal resections, prior WBRT, histology of the primary tumor, and larger cavity volume. No factors predictive of survival were identified. Symptomatic radiation-induced enhancement occurred in 6% of patients and leptomeningeal dissemination in 11%. Pathologically confirmed radiation-induced necrosis occurred in 1 (0.9%) patient.Conclusions: Adjuvant tumor bed SRS after the resection of brain metastasis is a valuable alternative to adjuvant WBRT. Risk factors for local recurrence are lower maximum radiation dose and a surgery-to-SRS delay longer than 3 weeks. Outcomes were not worse for patients who had undergone prior WBRT and subtotal or piecemeal resections. Pending the results of prospective randomized controlled trials, the authors' study supports the safety and efficacy of adjuvant SRS after resection of brain metastasis. SRS should be performed as early as possible, ideally within 3 weeks of the surgery.

OBJECTIVE: A systematic review was performed to provide objective evidence on the use of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the management of secretory pituitary adenomas and develop consensus recommendations. METHODS: The authors performed a systematic review of the English-language literature up until June 2018 using the PRISMA guidelines. The PubMed (Medline), Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched. A total of 45 articles reporting single-institution outcomes of SRS for acromegaly, Cushing’s disease, and prolactinomas were selected and included in the analysis. RESULTS: For acromegaly, random effects meta-analysis estimates for crude tumor control rate, crude endocrine remission rate, and any new hypopituitarism rates were 97.0% (95% CI 96.0%–98.0%), 44.0% (95% CI 35.0%–53.0%), and 17.0% (95% CI 13.0%–23.0%), respectively. For Cushing’s disease, random effects estimates for crude tumor control rate, crude endocrine remission rate, and any new hypopituitarism rate were 92.0% (95% CI 87.0%–95.0%), 48.0% (95% CI 35.0%–61.0%), and 21.0% (95% CI 13.0%–31.0%), respectively. For prolactinomas, random effects estimates for crude tumor control rate, crude endocrine remission rate, and any new hypopituitarism rate were 93.0% (95% CI 90.0%–95.0%), 28.0% (95% CI 19.0%–39.0%), and 12.0% (95% CI 6.0%–24.0%), respectively. Meta-regression analysis did not show a statistically significant association between mean margin dose with crude endocrine remission rate or mean margin dose with development of any new hypopituitarism rate for any of the secretory subtypes. CONCLUSIONS: SRS offers effective tumor control of hormone-producing pituitary adenomas in the majority of patients but a lower rate of endocrine improvement or remission.

Object: Hypothalamic hamartomas (HHs) are congenital lesions typically presenting with medically refractory epilepsy. Open or endoscopic surgical procedures to remove or disconnect the hamartoma have been reported to be effective but are associated with significant morbidity. The authors of studies on Gamma Knife surgery for HHs have reported an encouraging rate of epilepsy resolution with minimal side effects. At the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, the authors have undertaken a prospective observational study of the outcomes of patients who underwent radiosurgery for HHs. Methods: Patients were included in the study if they had an HH, refractory epilepsy, and no other suspected seizure focus. After radiosurgery, seizure status was assessed every 3 months and reported using the Engel Classification. Quality of life evaluation was performed annually using a standardized questionnaire, and neuropsychological evaluation was performed after 2 years. Results: Nine patients were included in the study. They ranged in age from 12 to 57 years. Epilepsy began in infancy in all cases and was refractory to standard antiepileptic drugs. The patients received an average of 2 antiepileptic drugs before undergoing radiosurgery. Using the Régis Classification, 6 patients had smaller hamartomas (Grade I–III) and underwent treatment of the entire lesion, using a margin dose of 14–20 Gy. Treatment volume ranged from 0.3 to 1.0 ml. Three patients had larger lesions (Grade IV–VI) for which a radiosurgical disconnection was attempted, targeting the area of attachment to the hypothalamus. For those patients, the margin dose was 15 or 16 Gy, with treatment volume ranging from 0.8 to 1.8 ml. In all patients, the radiation dose received by the optic pathways was kept below 10 Gy. Disconnection led to no improvement in epilepsy (Engel Class IV). Four patients in whom the entire lesion was treated are now seizure free (Engel Class I), with another having only rare seizures (Engel Class II). Quality of life and verbal memory were improved in those patients with more than 3 years of follow-up. No adverse event occurred after radiosurgery. Conclusions: Radiosurgery safely and effectively controlled the epileptic disorder in patients with HHs when the entire lesion could be targeted. Radiosurgical disconnection is ineffective and cannot be recommended.

Object: Among patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) there is a high incidence of trigeminal neuralgia (TN), and outcomes after treatment seem inferior to those in patients suffering from idiopathic TN. The goal of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes in patients with MS-related TN after Gamma Knife surgery (GKS) and compare them with those obtained using percutaneous retrogasserian glycerol rhizotomy (PRGR). Methods: The authors retrospectively reviewed the charts of 45 patients with MS-related TN. The first procedure undertaken was GKS in 27 patients and PRGR in 18 patients. Pain had been present for a median of 60 months (range 12–276 months) in patients who underwent GKS and 48 months (range 12–240 months) in patients who underwent PRGR. The following outcome measures were assessed in both groups of patients: pain relief (using the Barrow Neurological Institute [BNI] Pain Scale), procedure-related morbidity, time to pain relief and recurrence, and subsequent procedures that were performed. Results: The median duration of follow-up was 39 months (range 13–69 months) in the GKS group and 38 months (range 2–75 months) in the PRGR group. Reasonable pain control (BNI Pain Scale Scores I–IIIb) was noted in 22 patients (81.5%) who underwent GKS and in 18 patients (100%) who underwent PRGR. For patients who underwent GKS, the median time to pain relief was 6 months; for those who underwent PRGR, pain relief was immediate. In the GKS group12 patients required subsequent procedures (3 patients for absence of response and 9 patients for pain recurrence), whereas in the PRGR group 6 patients required subsequent procedures (all for pain recurrence). As of the last follow-up, complete or reasonable pain control was finally achieved in 23 patients (85.2%) in the GKS group and in 16 patients (88.9%) in the PRGR group. The morbidity rate was 22.2% in the GKS group (all due to sensory loss and paresthesia) and 66.7% in the PRGR group (mostly hypalgesia, with 2 patients having corneal reflex loss and 1 patient suffering from meningitis). Conclusions: Both GKS and PRGR are satisfactory strategies for treating MS-related TN. Gamma Knife surgery has a lower rate of sensory and overall morbidity than PRGR, but requires a delay before pain relief occurs. The authors propose that patients with extreme pain in need of fast relief should undergo PRGR. For other patients, both management strategies can lead to satisfactory pain relief, and the choice should be made based on patient preference and expectations.