Breast cancer is the leading cause of death in the female population and despite significant efforts made in diagnostic approaches and treatment strategies adopted for advanced breast cancer, the disease still remains incurable. Therefore, development of more effective systemic treatments constitutes a crucial need. Recently, several clinical trials were performed to find innovative predictive biomarkers and to improve the outcome of metastatic breast cancer through innovative therapeutic algorithms. In the pathogenesis of breast cancer, the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)-protein kinase B (PKB/AKT)-mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) axis is a key regulator of cell proliferation, growth, survival, metabolism, and motility, making it an interest and therapeutic target. Nevertheless, the PI3K/AKT/mTOR cascade includes a complex network of biological events, needing more sophisticated approaches for their use in cancer treatment. In this review, we described the rationale for targeting the PI3K pathway, the development of PI3K inhibitors and the future treatment directions of different breast cancer subtypes in the metastatic setting.

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is characterized by earlier recurrence and shorter survival compared with other types of breast cancer. Moreover, approximately 15 to 25% of all TNBC patients harbor germline BRCA (gBRCA) 1/2 mutations, which confer a more aggressive phenotype. However, TNBC seems to be particularly sensitive to chemotherapy, the so-called ‘triple negative paradox’. Therefore, Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is currently considered the preferred approach for early-stage TNBC. BRCA status has also been studied as a predictive biomarker of response to platinum compounds. Although several randomized trials investigated the addition of carboplatin to standard NACT in early-stage TNBC, the role of BRCA status remains unclear. In this retrospective analysis, we evaluated data from 136 consecutive patients with Stage I-III TNBC who received standard NACT with or without the addition of carboplatin, in order to define clinical features and outcomes in BRCA 1/2 mutation carriers and non-carrier controls. Between January 2013 and February 2021, 67 (51.3%) out of 136 patients received a standard anthracyclines/taxane regimen and 69 (50.7%) patients received a platinum-containing chemotherapy regimen. Deleterious germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations were identified in 39 (28.7%) patients. Overall, patients with deleterious gBRCA1/2 mutation have significantly higher pCR rate than non-carrier patients (23 [59%] of 39 vs. 33 [34%] of 97; p = 0.008). The benefit of harboring a gBRCA mutation was confirmed only in the subset of patients who received a platinum-based NACT (17 [65.4%] of 26 vs. 13 [30.2%] of 43; p = 0.005) while no differences were found in the platinum-free subgroup. Patients who achieved pCR after NACT had significantly better EFS (OR 4.5; 95% CI 1.9–10.7; p = 0.001) and OS (OR 3.3; 95% CI 1.3–8.9; p = 0.01) than patients who did not, regardless of BRCA1/2 mutation status and type of NACT received. Our results based on real-world evidence show that TNBC patients with the gBRCA1/2 mutation who received platinum-based NACT have a higher pCR rate than non-carrier patients, supporting the use of this chemotherapy regimen in this patient population. Long-term follow-up analyses are needed to further define the role of gBRCA mutation status on clinical outcomes in patients with early-TNBC.

Background: The aim of this study is to identify miRNAs able to predict the outcomes in breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Patients and methods: We retrospectively analyzed 24 patients receiving NAC and not reaching pathologic complete response (pCR). miRNAs were analyzed using an Illumina Next-Generation-Sequencing (NGS) system. Results: Event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly higher in patients with up-regulation of let-7a-5p (EFS p = 0.006; OS p = 0.0001), mirR-100-5p (EFS s p = 0.01; OS p = 0.03), miR-101-3p (EFS p = 0.05; OS p = 0.01), and miR-199a-3p (EFS p = 0.02; OS p = 0.01) in post-NAC samples, independently from breast cancer subtypes. At multivariate analysis, only let-7a-5p was significantly associated with EFS (p = 0.009) and OS (p = 0.0008). Conclusion: Up-regulation of the above miRNAs could represent biomarkers in breast cancer.

The prevention of chemotherapy-induced alopecia still represents an urgent need for every day clinical practice. In this regard, this prospective single-center study included breast cancer (BC) patients who underwent a scalp cooling device (Dignicap^®) during (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy with the aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this device in preventing alopecia. One hundred and seventy-eight patients (median age 43 years) were enrolled. The chemotherapy regimen included anthracycline and taxane-based chemotherapy (68.1%), docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (25.8%), anthracycline and taxane-based plus carboplatin (3.9%), and paclitaxel alone (2.2%). In 25.3% of cases, a dose dense schedule was used. Overall, the success rate was 68.0%: 100% in paclitaxel alone, 87.0% in docetaxel-cyclophosphamide, 59.5% in anthracycline and taxane, and 71.4% in the sequential regimen plus carboplatin group (anthracycline and taxane-based chemotherapy versus taxane-based chemotherapy, p ≤ 001. No difference in terms of hair preservation between dose-dense or standard schedule was found (p = 0.557). Early discontinuation of the scalp cooling was observed in 50 patients (28.1%). Although 138 patients (77.5%) experienced adverse events, 70.2% of patients were satisfied with this device. In conclusion, this large prospective study confirmed the helpful effect of the scalp cooling system in preventing alopecia in BC patients also undergoing sequential anthracyclines and taxane-based chemotherapy.

Background: Perimenopause is characterized by pronounced fluctuations in ovarian steroids, which are associated with an increase vulnerability to anxiety symptoms. Growing evidence indicates that declining estrogen levels influence gut microbiota composition and microbial metabolic activity, thereby modulating neuroimmune and neuroendocrine pathways involved in emotional regulation. This review explores gut microbiota alterations occurring during the menopausal transition and critically evaluates dietary strategies targeting microbiota–gut–brain mechanisms potentially relevant to perimenopausal anxiety. Methods: A structured literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science to identify clinical, translational, and preclinical studies addressing: (i) gut microbiota changes across perimenopause and menopause; (ii) microbiota–gut–brain pathways implicated in anxiety; and (iii) dietary patterns, nutrients, probiotics, and prebiotics with documented microbiota-modulating effects. The available evidence was synthesized narratively, with particular attention to biological plausibility and clinical relevance. Results: The perimenopause transition is associated with reduced microbial diversity, depletion of Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, and short-chain fatty acid (SCFA)-producing taxa, and enrichment of pro-inflammatory microbial signatures. These alterations are linked to increased intestinal permeability, altered tryptophan-kynurenine metabolism, immune activation, and dysregulated hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis activity. Dietary interventions, including Mediterranean-style diets, fiber- and polyphenol-rich foods, fermented products, and selected probiotic and prebiotic formulations, have been shown to modulate gut microbial composition, enhance SCFA production, and attenuate inflammatory and neuroendocrine stress pathways. Preliminary evidence suggests potential anxiolytic benefits; however, randomized controlled trials specifically targeting perimenopausal populations remain limited. Conclusions: Gut microbiota dysbiosis may contribute to anxiety vulnerability in perimenopausal women through interconnected immune, metabolic, and neuroendocrine mechanisms. Dietary modulation of the intestinal microbiota represents a biologically plausible and low-risk complementary approach to support emotional well-being during this transitional period. Well-designed, perimenopause-specific clinical trials are needed to confirm efficacy and inform microbiome-based nutritional strategies.

Background/Objectives: Insomnia is one of the most prevalent and persistent symptoms among patients with breast cancer, yet it remains under-recognized and undertreated in routine clinical practice. Beyond its impact on sleep quality, insomnia is increasingly understood as a multidimensional condition involving neurobiological, psychological, and behavioral mechanisms, closely intertwined with cancer-related stress and psychiatric comorbidities. This narrative review aims to provide a comprehensive and integrative overview of insomnia in breast cancer, focusing on its epidemiology, pathophysiological underpinnings, neuropsychiatric correlates, and clinical implications, while highlighting gaps in current research and management. Methods: A narrative review of the literature was conducted, including studies published in major medical databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science) up to 2025. Relevant articles addressing insomnia, sleep disturbances, psychiatric symptoms, and neurobiological mechanisms in breast cancer populations were selected and synthesized. Results: Insomnia affects a substantial proportion of breast cancer patients across the disease trajectory, from diagnosis to survivorship. Its etiology is multifactorial, involving dysregulation of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis, inflammatory processes, and circadian rhythm, as well as treatment-related factors such as chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, and menopausal symptoms. Insomnia frequently co-occurs with depression, anxiety, fatigue, and pain, forming symptom clusters that significantly impair quality of life and may influence clinical outcomes. Emerging evidence supports a bidirectional relationship between insomnia and psychiatric vulnerability, suggesting a shared neurobiological substrate within the brain–body stress axis. Conclusions: Insomnia in breast cancer should be conceptualized as a neuropsychiatric condition embedded within a broader stress-related symptom network rather than as an isolated sleep disturbance. Improved screening, interdisciplinary management, and the integration of evidence-based interventions such as cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia are essential. Research should focus on personalized and mechanistically informed approaches to better address this highly prevalent yet insufficiently managed condition.