Fostamatinib, a recently approved Syk inhibitor used in adult primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), has been shown to be safe and effective in this disorder. However, clinical trial results may not be similarly reproduced in clinical practice. Here, 138 patients with ITP (both primary and secondary) from 42 Spanish centers who had been treated with fostamatinib were evaluated prospectively and retrospectively. The median age of our cohort (55.8% women) was 66 years (interquartile range [IQR], 56-80). The median time since ITP diagnosis at fostamatinib initiation was 51 months (IQR, 10-166). The median number of therapies before fostamatinib initiation was 4 (IQR, 2-5), including eltrombopag (76.1%), romiplostim (57.2%), and IV immunoglobulins (44.2%). Fifty-eight patients (42.0%) had signs/symptoms of bleeding in the month before treatment initiation. Seventy-nine percent of patients responded to fostamatinib with 53.6% complete responses (platelet count > 100 × 109/L). Eighty-three patients (60.1%) received fostamatinib monotherapy, achieving a high response rate (85.4%). The proportion of time in response during the 27-month period examined was 83.3%. The median time to platelet response was 11 days (IQR, 7-21). Sixty-seven patients (48.5%) experienced adverse events, mainly grade 1 to 2; the commonest of which were diarrhea (n = 28) and hypertension (n = 21). One patient had deep venous thrombosis, and one patient developed acute myocardial infarction. Fostamatinib was shown to be effective with good safety profile in patients with primary and secondary ITP across a wide age spectrum in this real-world study.

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune disease characterized by an isolated decrease in the platelet count and an increased risk of bleeding. The pathogenesis is complex, affecting multiple components of the immune system and causing both peripheral destruction of platelets and impaired central megakaryopoiesis and platelet production in the bone marrow. Here, we intend to contextualize the current knowledge on the pathophysiology, terminology, epidemiology, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and prognosis of ITP from a historical perspective and the first references to the never-stopping garnering of knowledge about this entity. We highlight the necessity to better understand ITP in order to be able to provide ITP patients with personalized treatment options, improving disease prognosis and reducing the incidence or frequency of refractoriness.

Primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is a complex autoimmune disease whose hallmark is a deregulation of cellular and humoral immunity leading to increased destruction and reduced production of platelets. The heterogeneity of presentation and clinical course hampers personalized approaches for diagnosis and management. In 2021, the Spanish ITP Group (GEPTI) of the Spanish Society of Hematology and Hemotherapy (SEHH) updated a consensus document that had been launched in 2011. The updated guidelines have been the reference for the diagnosis and management of primary ITP in Spain ever since. Nevertheless, the emergence of new tools and strategies makes it advisable to review them again. For this reason, we have updated the main recommendations appropriately. Our aim is to provide a practical tool to facilitate the integral management of all aspects of primary ITP management.

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune disease characterized by an isolated decrease in platelet count and an increased risk of bleeding. The pathogenesis is complex, affecting multiple components of the immune system and causing both peripheral destruction of platelets and inadequate production in the bone marrow. In this article, we review the treatment of ITP from a historical perspective, discussing first line and second line treatments, and management of refractory disease.

The most severe clinical manifestations of the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), are due to an unbalanced immune response and a pro-thrombotic hemostatic disturbance, with arterial hypertension or diabetes as acknowledged risk factors. While waiting for a specific treatment, the clinical management of hospitalized patients is still a matter of debate, and the effectiveness of treatments to manage clinical manifestations and comorbidities has been questioned. In this study, we aim to assess the impact of the clinical management of arterial hypertension, inflammation and thrombosis on the survival of COVID-19 patients. The Spanish cohorts included in this observational retrospective study are from HM Hospitales (2035 patients) and from Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias (72 patients). Kaplan Meier survival curves, Cox regression and propensity score matching analyses were employed, considering demographic variables, comorbidities and treatment arms (when opportune) as covariates. The management of arterial hypertension with angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers is not detrimental, as was initially reported, and neither was the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). On the contrary, our analysis shows that the use on itself of corticosteroids is not beneficial. Importantly, the management of COVID-19 patients with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) as an anticoagulant significantly improves the survival of hospitalized patients. These results delineate the current treatment options under debate, supporting the effectiveness of thrombosis prophylaxis on COVID-19 patients as a first-line treatment without the need for compromising the treatment of comorbidities, while suggesting cautiousness when administering corticosteroids.

Hemophilia A (HA) is a rare bleeding disorder caused by factor VIII (FVIII) deficiency due to various genetic mutations in the F8 gene. The disease severity inversely correlates with the plasma levels of functional FVIII. The treatment of HA patients is based on FVIII replacement therapy, either following a prophylactic or on-demand regime, depending on the severity of the disease at diagnosis and the patient’s clinical manifestations. The hemorrhagic manifestations are widely variable amongst HA patients, who may require monitoring and treatment re-adjustment to minimize bleeding symptoms. Notably, laboratory monitoring of the FVIII activity is difficult due to a lack of sensitivity to various FVIII-related molecules, including non-factor replacement therapies. Hence, patient management is determined mainly based on clinical manifestations and patient–clinician history. Our goal was to validate the ST Genesia^® automated thrombin generation analyzer to quantify the relative hemostatic status in HA patients. We recruited a cohort of HA patients from the Principality of Asturias (Spain), following treatment and at a stable non-bleeding phase. The entire cohort (57 patients) had been comprehensively studied at diagnosis, including FVIII and VWF activity assays and F8 genetic screening, and then clinically monitored until the Thrombin Generation Test (TGT) was performed. All patients were recruited prior to treatment administration, at the maximum time-window following the previous dose. Interestingly, the severe/moderate patients had a similar TGT compared to the mild patients, reflecting the non-bleeding phase of our patient cohort, regardless of the initial diagnosis (i.e., the severity of the disease), treatment regime, and FVIII activity measured at the time of the TGT. Thus, TGT parameters, especially the peak height (Peak), may reflect the actual hemostatic status of a patient more accurately compared to FVIII activity assays, which may be compromised by non-factor replacement therapies. Furthermore, our data supports the utilization of combined TGT variables, together with the severity of patient symptoms, along with the F8 mutation type to augment the prognostic capacity of TGT. The results from this observational study suggest that TGT parameters measured with ST Genesia^® may represent a suitable tool to monitor the hemostatic status of patients requiring a closer follow-up and a tailored therapeutic adjustment, including other hemophilia subtypes or bleeding disorders.