J. Geoffrey Chase

Dr. J. Geoffrey Chase

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 March 2022 in Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DKDavid C. Klonoff
David C. Klonoff
JWJing Wang
Jing Wang
DRDavid Rodbard
David Rodbard
MKMichael A. Kohn
Michael A. Kohn
CLChengdong Li
Chengdong Li
BKBoris Kovatchev
Boris Kovatchev
Background: A composite metric for the quality of glycemia from continuous glucose monitor (CGM) tracings could be useful for assisting with basic clinical interpretation of CGM data. Methods: We assembled a data set of 14-day CGM tracings from 225 insulin-treated adults with diabetes. Using a balanced incomplete block design, 330 clinicians who were highly experienced with CGM analysis and interpretation ranked the CGM tracings from best to worst quality of glycemia. We used principal component analysis and multiple regressions to develop a model to predict the clinician ranking based on seven standard metrics in an Ambulatory Glucose Profile: very low–glucose and low-glucose hypoglycemia; very high–glucose and high-glucose hyperglycemia; time in range; mean glucose; and coefficient of variation. Results: The analysis showed that clinician rankings depend on two components, one related to hypoglycemia that gives more weight to very low-glucose than to low-glucose and the other related to hyperglycemia that likewise gives greater weight to very high-glucose than to high-glucose. These two components should be calculated and displayed separately, but they can also be combined into a single Glycemia Risk Index (GRI) that corresponds closely to the clinician rankings of the overall quality of glycemia (r = 0.95). The GRI can be displayed graphically on a GRI Grid with the hypoglycemia component on the horizontal axis and the hyperglycemia component on the vertical axis. Diagonal lines divide the graph into five zones (quintiles) corresponding to the best (0th to 20th percentile) to worst (81st to 100th percentile) overall quality of glycemia. The GRI Grid enables users to track sequential changes within an individual over time and compare groups of individuals. Conclusion: The GRI is a single-number summary of the quality of glycemia. Its hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia components provide actionable scores and a graphical display (the GRI Grid) that can be used by clinicians and researchers to determine the glycemic effects of prescribed and investigational treatments.

19 January 2005 in Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CHChristopher E. Hann
Christopher E. Hann
JCJ. Geoffrey Chase
J. Geoffrey Chase
JLJessica Lin
Jessica Lin
TLThomas Lotz
Thomas Lotz
CDCarmen V. Doran
Carmen V. Doran
GSGeoffrey M. Shaw
Geoffrey M. Shaw

20 February 2018 in BioMedical Engineering OnLine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JCJ. Geoffrey Chase
J. Geoffrey Chase
JPJean-Charles Preiser
Jean-Charles Preiser
JDJennifer L. Dickson
Jennifer L. Dickson
APAntoine Pironet
Antoine Pironet
YCYeong Shiong Chiew
Yeong Shiong Chiew
TDThomas Desaive
Thomas Desaive
Critical care, like many healthcare areas, is under a dual assault from significantly increasing demographic and economic pressures. Intensive care unit (ICU) patients are highly variable in response to treatment, and increasingly aging populations mean ICUs are under increasing demand and their cohorts are increasingly ill. Equally, patient expectations are growing, while the economic ability to deliver care to all is declining. Better, more productive care is thus the big challenge. One means to that end is personalised care designed to manage the significant inter- and intra-patient variability that makes the ICU patient difficult. Thus, moving from current “one size fits all” protocolised care to adaptive, model-based “one method fits all” personalised care could deliver the required step change in the quality, and simultaneously the productivity and cost, of care. Computer models of human physiology are a unique tool to personalise care, as they can couple clinical data with mathematical methods to create subject-specific models and virtual patients to design new, personalised and more optimal protocols, as well as to guide care in real-time. They rely on identifying time varying patient-specific parameters in the model that capture inter- and intra-patient variability, the difference between patients and the evolution of patient condition. Properly validated, virtual patients represent the real patients, and can be used in silico to test different protocols or interventions, or in real-time to guide care. Hence, the underlying models and methods create the foundation for next generation care, as well as a tool for safely and rapidly developing personalised treatment protocols over large virtual cohorts using virtual trials. This review examines the models and methods used to create virtual patients. Specifically, it presents the models types and structures used and the data required. It then covers how to validate the resulting virtual patients and trials, and how these virtual trials can help design and optimise clinical trial. Links between these models and higher order, more complex physiome models are also discussed. In each section, it explores the progress reported up to date, especially on core ICU therapies in glycemic, circulatory and mechanical ventilation management, where high cost and frequency of occurrence provide a significant opportunity for model-based methods to have measurable clinical and economic impact. The outcomes are readily generalised to other areas of medical care.

3 December 2003 in Medical Engineering & Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BSBram W. Smith
Bram W. Smith
JCJ. Geoffrey Chase
J. Geoffrey Chase
RNRoger I. Nokes
Roger I. Nokes
GSGeoffrey M. Shaw
Geoffrey M. Shaw
GWGraeme Wake
Graeme Wake
Characterising circulatory dysfunction and choosing a suitable treatment is often difficult and time consuming, and can result in a deterioration in patient condition, or unsuitable therapy choices. A stable minimal model of the human cardiovascular system (CVS) is developed with the ultimate specific aim of assisting medical staff for rapid, on site modelling to assist in diagnosis and treatment. Models found in the literature simulate specific areas of the CVS with limited direct usefulness to medical staff. Others model the full CVS as a closed loop system, but they were found to be very complex, difficult to solve, or unstable. This paper develops a model that uses a minimal number of governing equations with the primary goal of accurately capturing trends in the CVS dynamics in a simple, easily solved, robust model. The model is shown to have long term stability and consistency with non-specific initial conditions as a result. An "open on pressure close on flow" valve law is created to capture the effects of inertia and the resulting dynamics of blood flow through the cardiac valves. An accurate, stable solution is performed using a method that varies the number of states in the model depending on the specific phase of the cardiac cycle, better matching the real physiological conditions. Examples of results include a 9% drop in cardiac output when increasing the thoracic pressure from -4 to 0 mmHg, and an increase in blood pressure from 120/80 to 165/130 mmHg when the systemic resistance is doubled. These results show that the model adequately provides appropriate magnitudes and trends that are in agreement with existing data for a variety of physiologically verified test cases simulating human CVS function.

1 January 2006 in Journal of Biomechanics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SMS. Moore
S. Moore
TDT. David
T. David
JCJ. Geoffrey Chase
J. Geoffrey Chase
JAJ. Arnold
J. Arnold
JFJ. Fink
J. Fink

1 February 2008 in Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JLJessica Lin
Jessica Lin
DLDominic Lee
Dominic Lee
JCJ. Geoffrey Chase
J. Geoffrey Chase
GSGeoffrey M. Shaw
Geoffrey M. Shaw
ACAaron Le Compte
Aaron Le Compte
CHChristopher E. Hann
Christopher E. Hann