Chronic active Epstein-Barr virus infection (CAEBV) is one of the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-positive T- or NK-lymphoproliferative diseases. It is considered rare and geographically limited to Japan and East Asia. However, CAEBV is drawing international attention, and the number of case reported worldwide is increasing, after its classification in the EBV-positive T- or NK-cell neoplasms, in the 2016 WHO classification. In this article, I review current advances in the study of CAEBV under the new definition and show future directions. In CAEBV, EBV-infected T or NK cells clonally proliferate and infiltrate multiple organs, leading to their failure. These characteristics define CAEBV as a lymphoid neoplasm. However, the main symptom of CAEBV is inflammation. Recently, the mechanisms underlying the development of CAEBV have gradually become clearer. EBV infection of T or NK cells can occur during the acute phase of primary infection with a high EBV load in the peripheral blood. In addition, it was reported that cytotoxic T cells decreased in numbers or showed dysfunction in CAEBV. These findings suggest that undetermined immunosuppressive disorders may underlie persistent infection of T or NK cells. Furthermore, EBV itself contributes to the survival of host cells. In vitro EBV infection of T cells induced intercellular survival-promoting pathways. Constitutive activation of NF-kB and STAT3 was observed in EBV-positive T or NK cells in CAEBV, promoting not only cell survival but also CAEBV development. During the disease course, CAEBV can lead to two lethal conditions: hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis and chemotherapy-resistant lymphoma. It is necessary to start treatment before these conditions develop. At present, the only effective treatment strategy for eradicating EBV-infected T or NK cells is allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). However, patients with an active disease, in which the condition is accompanied by fever, liver dysfunction, progressive skin lesions, vasculitis, or uveitis, had worse outcomes after allo-HSCT, than patients with an inactive disease had. Unfortunately, current chemotherapies are insufficient to improve the activity of CAEBV. Based on the molecular mechanisms for the development of the disease, the NF-kB, or JAK/STAT mediating pathways are attractive candidate targets for new treatments.

Systemic chronic active Epstein-Barr virus infection (sCAEBV) was defined as a T- or NK-cell neoplasm in the 2017 World Health Organization (WHO) classification. To clarify the clinical features of sCAEBV under this classification and review the effects of chemotherapy, we performed a nationwide survey in Japan from 2016 through 2018 of patients with sCAEBV newly diagnosed from January 2003 through March 2016. One hundred cases were evaluated. The patients were aged 1 to 78 years (median, 21) and included 53 males and 47 females. Spontaneous regression was not observed in patients with active disease. In the childhood-onset group (age, 45 years) were female. The prognosis of the childhood-onset group was better than those of the adolescent/adult- and elderly-onset groups. The main chemotherapies used were a combination of cyclosporine A, steroids, and etoposide (cooling therapy) in 52 cases and cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone (CHOP) in 45 cases. The rate of complete response (CR), defined as complete resolution of disease activity, was 17% for cooling therapy and 13% for CHOP. Virological CR was not observed. The 3-year overall survival rates in patients treated with chemotherapy only (n = 20), chemotherapy followed by allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT; n = 47), and allo-HSCT only (n = 12) were 0%, 65%, and 82%, respectively. Distinct characteristics were observed between childhood- and elderly-onset sCAEBV, and they appeared to be different disorders. Chemotherapy is currently insufficient to resolve disease activity and eradicate infected cells. The development of an effective treatment is urgently needed.

Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) has been detected in several T- and NK-cell neoplasms such as extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma nasal type, aggressive NK-cell leukemia, EBV-positive peripheral T-cell lymphoma, systemic EBV-positive T-cell lymphoma of childhood, and chronic active EBV infection (CAEBV). However, how this virus contributes to lymphomagenesis in T or NK cells remains largely unknown. Here, we examined NF-κB activation in EBV-positive T or NK cell lines, SNT8, SNT15, SNT16, SNK6, and primary EBV-positive and clonally proliferating T/NK cells obtained from the peripheral blood of patients with CAEBV. Western blotting, electrophoretic mobility shift assays, and immunofluorescent staining revealed persistent NF-κB activation in EBV-infected cell lines and primary cells from patients. Furthermore, we investigated the role of EBV in infected T cells. We performed an in vitro infection assay using MOLT4 cells infected with EBV. The infection directly induced NF-κB activation, promoted survival, and inhibited etoposide-induced apoptosis in MOLT4 cells. The luciferase assay suggested that LMP1 mediated NF-κB activation in MOLT4 cells. IMD-0354, a specific inhibitor of NF-κB that suppresses NF-κB activation in cell lines, inhibited cell survival and induced apoptosis. These results indicate that EBV induces NF-κB-mediated survival signals in T and NK cells, and therefore, may contribute to the lymphomagenesis of these cells.

In order to prevent central nervous system (CNS) involvement and improve the prognosis of primary intraocular lymphoma (PIOL), we prospectively evaluated the efficacy of combined therapy using intravitreal methotrexate (MTX) and systemic high‐dose MTX on treatment‐naïve PIOL. Patients with newly diagnosed PIOL whose lymphoma was limited to the eyes were enrolled. The patients were treated with weekly intravitreal MTX until the ocular lesions were resolved, followed by five cycles of systemic high‐dose MTX (3.5 g/m²) every other week. Ten patients were enrolled in this study and completed the treatment. All patients achieved complete response for their ocular lesions with rapid decrease of intravitreal interleukin‐10 concentration. Adverse events of intravitreal and systemic high‐dose MTX were mild and tolerable. With a median follow‐up of 29.5 months, four patients (40%) experienced the CNS disease development and the mean CNS lymphoma‐free survival (CLFS) time was 51.1 months. Two‐year CLFS, which was the primary end‐point of the study, was 58.3% (95% confidence interval, 23.0–82.1%). In contrast, eight patients were treated with intravitreal MTX alone in our institute, and their 2‐year CLFS was 37.5% (95% confidence interval, 8.7–67.4%). In conclusion, systemic high‐dose MTX following intravitreal MTX is feasible and might be effective in preventing CNS involvement of PIOL. Further arrangements are worth considering in order to improve the effects. This study was registered with UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000003921).