Ivana Budinska

Dr. Ivana Budinska


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

30Years (1997-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
7 September 2021 in Machines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Sepideh Hassankhani DolatabadiSepideh Hassankhani Dolatabadi
Sepideh Hassankhani Dolatabadi
IBIvana Budinska
Ivana Budinska
Today, small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) play an important role in the economy of societies. Although environmental factors, such as COVID-19, as well as non-environmental factors, such as equipment failure, make these industries more vulnerable, they can be minimized by better understanding the concerns and threats these industries face. Only a few SMEs have the capacity to implement the innovative manufacturing technologies of Industry 4.0. The system must be highly adaptable to any equipment, have low costs, avoid the need of doing complex integrations and setups, and have future reliability due to the rapid growth of technology. The goal of this study was to provide an overview of past articles (2010–2020), highlighting the major expectations, requirements, and challenges for SMEs regarding the implementation of predictive maintenance (PdM). The proposed solutions to meet these expectations, requirements, and challenges are discussed. In general, in this study, we attempted to overcome the challenges and limitations of using smart manufacturing—PdM, in particular—in small- and medium-sized enterprises by summarizing the solutions offered in different industries and with various conditions. Moreover, this literature review enables managers and stakeholders of organizations to find solutions from previous studies for a specific category, with consideration for their expectations and needs. This can be significantly helpful for small- and medium-sized organizations to save time due to time-consuming maintenance processes.

18 March 2023 in Symmetry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ASAsad Saghari
Asad Saghari
IBIvana Budinska
Ivana Budinska
MHMasoud Hosseinimehr
Masoud Hosseinimehr
SRShima Rahmani
Shima Rahmani
The automotive family design is known as one of the most complex engineering design problems with multiple groups of stakeholders involved from different domains of interest and contradictory attributes. Taking into account all stakeholders’ preferences, which are generally symmetrical, non-deterministic distributions around a mean value, and determining the right value of attributes for each alternative are two basic challenges for these types of decision-making problems. In this research, the possibility to achieve a robust-reliable decision by focusing on the two aforementioned challenges is explored. In the proposed methodology, a random simulation technique is used to elicit stakeholders’ preferences and determine the relative importance of attributes. The decision space and values of attributes are determined using the Knowledge Discovery in Databases (KDD) technique, and to achieve a robust-reliable decision, statistical and sensitivity analyses are performed. By implementing this methodology, the decision-maker is assured that the preferences of all stakeholders are taken into account and the determined values for attributes are reliable with the least degree of uncertainty. The proposed methodology aims to select benchmark platforms for the development of an automotive family. The decision space includes 546 automobiles in 11 different segments based on 34 platforms. There are 6223 unique possible states of stakeholders’ preferences. As a result, five platforms with the highest degree of desirability and robustness to diversity and uncertainty in the stakeholders’ preferences are selected. The presented methodology can be implemented in complex decision-making problems, including a large and diverse number of stakeholders and multiple attributes. In addition, this methodology is compatible with many Multi-Attribute Decision-Making (MADM) techniques, including SAW, AHP, SWARA, and TOPSIS.


24 February 2024
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
Sepideh Hassankhani DolatabadiSepideh Hassankhani Dolatabadi
Sepideh Hassankhani Dolatabadi
IBIvana Budinska
Ivana Budinska
RBRafe Behmaneshpour
Rafe Behmaneshpour
EGEmil Gatial
Emil Gatial

29 September 2018
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
IBIvana Budinska
Ivana Budinska

1 September 2003 in IFAC Proceedings Volumes
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TDT.-Tung Dang
T.-Tung Dang
BFB. Frankovič
B. Frankovič
IBIvana Budinska
Ivana Budinska