Laurent Soustelle

Dr. Laurent Soustelle

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2004 in Current Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TRThomas Rival
Thomas Rival
LSLaurent Soustelle
Laurent Soustelle
CSColette Strambi
Colette Strambi
MBMarie-Thérèse Besson
Marie-Thérèse Besson
MIMagali Iché
Magali Iché
SBSerge Birman
Serge Birman

4 March 2015 in Journal of Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AFAlice Sarah French
Alice Sarah French
MSMarie-Jeanne Sellier
Marie-Jeanne Sellier
MAMoutaz Ali Agha
Moutaz Ali Agha
AGAlexandra Guigue
Alexandra Guigue
MCMarie-Ange Chabaud
Marie-Ange Chabaud
FMFrédéric Marion-Poll
Frédéric Marion-Poll
In flies and humans, bitter chemicals are known to inhibit sugar detection, but the adaptive role of this inhibition is often overlooked. At best, this inhibition is described as contributing to the rejection of potentially toxic food, but no studies have addressed the relative importance of the direct pathway that involves activating bitter-sensitive cells versus the indirect pathway represented by the inhibition of sugar detection. Using toxins to selectively ablate or inactivate populations of bitter-sensitive cells, we assessed the behavioral responses of flies to sucrose mixed with strychnine (which activates bitter-sensitive cells and inhibits sugar detection) or withl-canavanine (which only activates bitter-sensitive cells). As expected, flies with ablated bitter-sensitive cells failed to detectl-canavanine mixed with sucrose in three different feeding assays (proboscis extension responses, capillary feeding, and two-choice assays). However, such flies were still able to avoid strychnine mixed with sucrose. By means of electrophysiological recordings, we established that bitter molecules differ in their potency to inhibit sucrose detection and that sugar-sensing inhibition affects taste cells on the proboscis and the legs. The optogenetic response of sugar-sensitive cells was not reduced by strychnine, thus suggesting that this inhibition is linked directly to sugar transduction. We postulate that sugar-sensing inhibition represents a mechanism in insects to prevent ingesting harmful substances occurring within mixtures.

1 January 2009 in The International Journal of Developmental Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CJCecile Jacques
Cecile Jacques
LSLaurent Soustelle
Laurent Soustelle
INIstvan Nagy
Istvan Nagy
CDCeline Diebold
Celine Diebold
Angela GiangrandeAngela Giangrande
Angela Giangrande
Glial cell deficient/Glial cells missing (Glide/Gcm) transcription factor is expressed in all glial precursors of the Drosophila embryo. Gcm is necessary and sufficient to induce glial differentiation but also plays a role in other cell types, by interacting with specific factors. To find potential partners of Gcm which trigger these other pathways, we performed a yeast two-hybrid screen and identified dpias, a gene involved in post-embryonic hematopoiesis. dpias larvae show melanotic tumors due to excess of lamellocytes, a hemocyte lineage that is involved in non-self recognition. We here show that blocking Gcm activity also triggers melanotic tumors and that gcm interacts genetically with dpias. Moreover, the members of the Janus Kinase (JAK)/ Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription (STAT) pathway, which are known for their role in the vertebrate and invertebrate immune system and are required for dpias-dependent tumor formation, act downstream of Gcm. Altogether, this study identifies an unpredicted role of Gcm, dictated by its cofactor dpias, allowing Gcm to act in a specific pathway. Together with the recent finding that glia act as scavengers during development and in pathological conditions, our data open new perspectives onto the cellular and molecular pathways involved in non-self recognition within and outside the nervous system.

30 June 2009 in PLOS Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CMChristian Mitri
Christian Mitri
LSLaurent Soustelle
Laurent Soustelle
BFBérénice Framery
Bérénice Framery
JBJoël Bockaert
Joël Bockaert
MPMarie-Laure Parmentier
Marie-Laure Parmentier
YGYves Grau
Yves Grau
For all animals, the taste sense is crucial to detect and avoid ingesting toxic molecules. Many toxins are synthesized by plants as a defense mechanism against insect predation. One example of such a natural toxic molecule is l-canavanine, a nonprotein amino acid found in the seeds of many legumes. Whether and how insects are informed that some plants contain l-canavanine remains to be elucidated. In insects, the taste sense relies on gustatory receptors forming the gustatory receptor (Gr) family. Gr proteins display highly divergent sequences, suggesting that they could cover the entire range of tastants. However, one cannot exclude the possibility of evolutionarily independent taste receptors. Here, we show that l-canavanine is not only toxic, but is also a repellent for Drosophila. Using a pharmacogenetic approach, we find that flies sense food containing this poison by the DmX receptor. DmXR is an insect orphan G-protein–coupled receptor that has partially diverged in its ligand binding pocket from the metabotropic glutamate receptor family. Blockade of DmXR function with an antagonist lowers the repulsive effect of l-canavanine. In addition, disruption of the DmXR encoding gene, called mangetout (mtt), suppresses the l-canavanine repellent effect. To avoid the ingestion of l-canavanine, DmXR expression is required in bitter-sensitive gustatory receptor neurons, where it triggers the premature retraction of the proboscis, thus leading to the end of food searching. These findings show that the DmX receptor, which does not belong to the Gr family, fulfills a gustatory function necessary to avoid eating a natural toxin. Plants evolve to fend off the insects that attack them, often by synthesizing compounds toxic to insects. In turn, insects develop strategies to avoid these plants or resist their toxins. Some plant toxins are nonprotein amino acids. For example, seeds from numerous legumes contain high amounts of l-canavanine, a nonprotein amino acid that is structurally related to l-arginine and is highly toxic to most insects. How insects can detect l-canavanine remains to be elucidated. Using pharmacology, genetics, and behavioral approaches, we show that flies sense l-canavanine using the receptor DmX, an orphan G-protein–coupled receptor that has diverged in its ligand binding pocket from metabotropic glutamate receptors. Disruption of the DmXR gene, called mangetout (mtt), suppresses the l-canavanine repellent effect. DmXR is expressed and required in aversive gustatory receptor neurons, where it triggers the premature retraction of the proboscis, thus leading to the end of food searching. Our results indicate a mechanism by which some insects may detect and avoid a plant toxin.

1 February 2000 in Current Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MBMarie-Thérèse Besson
Marie-Thérèse Besson
LSLaurent Soustelle
Laurent Soustelle
SBSerge Birman
Serge Birman

25 July 2007 in Developmental Dynamics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LSLaurent Soustelle
Laurent Soustelle
Angela GiangrandeAngela Giangrande
Angela Giangrande
glial cells missing genes (gcm and gcm2) act as the glial fate determinants in the Drosophila embryo. However, their requirement in the adult central nervous system (CNS) is at present not known, except for their role in lamina glia. This is particularly important with respect to two recent sets of data. Adult glial subpopulations differentiate through embryonic glia proliferation. Also, gcm‐gcm2 are required for the differentiation of specific adult neurons. We here show that gcm is expressed in precursors and postmitotic, migrating, cells of the medulla neuropile glia (mng) lineage. It is also expressed in a thoracic glial lineage and in neurons of the ventral nerve cord (VNC). Finally, while gcm is required for gliogenesis in medulla and VNC, it does not seem to be required for the generation of VNC neurons. Developmental Dynamics 236:2101–2108, 2007.