Aims/hypothesis The Di@bet.es Study is the first national study in Spain to examine the prevalence of diabetes and impaired glucose regulation. Methods A population-based, cross-sectional, cluster sampling study was carried out, with target population being the entire Spanish population. Five thousand and seventy-two participants in 100 clusters (health centres or the equivalent in each region) were randomly selected with a probability proportional to population size. Participation rate was 55.8%. Study variables were a clinical and demographic structured survey, lifestyle survey, physical examination (weight, height, BMI, waist and hip circumference, blood pressure) and OGTT (75 g). Results Almost 30% of the study population had some carbohydrate disturbance. The overall prevalence of diabetes mellitus adjusted for age and sex was 13.8% (95% CI 12.8, 14.7%), of which about half had unknown diabetes: 6.0% (95% CI 5.4, 6.7%). The age- and sex-adjusted prevalence rates of isolated impaired fasting glucose (IFG), isolated impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and combined IFG–IGT were 3.4% (95% CI 2.9, 4.0%), 9.2% (95% CI 8.2, 10.2%) and 2.2% (95% CI 1.7, 2.7%), respectively. The prevalence of diabetes and impaired glucose regulation increased significantly with age (p < 0.0001), and was higher in men than in women (p < 0.001). Conclusions/interpretation The Di@bet.es Study shows, for the first time, the prevalence rates of diabetes and impaired glucose regulation in a representative sample of the Spanish population.

Context: Several endocrine disorders that share resistance to PTH are grouped under the term pseudohypoparathyroidism (PHP). PHP type I, associated with blunted PTH-induced nephrogenous cAMP formation and phosphate excretion, is subdivided according to the presence or absence of additional endocrine abnormalities, Albright’s hereditary osteodystrophy (AHO), and reduced Gsα activity caused by GNAS mutations. Objective: We sought to identify the molecular defect in four unrelated patients who were thought to have PHP-Ia because of PTH and TSH resistance and mild AHO features. Methods: Gsα activity and mutation analysis, and assessment of GNAS haplotype, methylation, and gene expression were performed for probands and family members. Results: Two patients showed modest decreases in erythrocyte Gsα activity. Instead of Gsα point mutations, however, all four patients showed methylation defects of the GNAS locus, a feature previously described only for PHP-Ib. Furthermore, one patient with an isolated loss of GNAS exon A/B methylation had the 3-kb STX16 deletion frequently identified in PHP-Ib patients. In all but one of the remaining patients, haplotype analysis excluded large deletions or uniparental disomy as the cause of the observed methylation changes. Conclusions: Our investigations indicate that an overlap may exist between molecular and clinical features of PHP-Ia and PHP-Ib. No current mechanisms can explain the AHO-like features of our patients, some of which may not be linked to GNAS. Therefore, patients with hormone resistance and AHO-like features in whom coding Gsα mutations have been excluded should be evaluated for epigenetic alterations within GNAS.

Aims: The second Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes and Needs (DAWN2) study sought cross‐national comparisons of perceptions on healthcare provision for benchmarking and sharing of clinical practices to improve diabetes care.Methods: In total, 4785 healthcare professionals caring for people with diabetes across 17 countries participated in an online survey designed to assess diabetes healthcare provision, self‐management and training.Results: Between 61.4 and 92.9% of healthcare professionals felt that people with diabetes needed to improve various self‐management activities; glucose monitoring (range, 29.3–92.1%) had the biggest country difference, with a between‐country variance of 20%. The need for a major improvement in diabetes self‐management education was reported by 60% (26.4–81.4%) of healthcare professionals, with a 12% between‐country variance. Provision of diabetes services differed among countries, with many healthcare professionals indicating that major improvements were needed across a range of areas, including healthcare organization [30.6% (7.4–67.1%)], resources for diabetes prevention [78.8% (60.4–90.5%)], earlier diagnosis and treatment [67.9% (45.0–85.5%)], communication between team members and people with diabetes [56.1% (22.3–85.4%)], specialist nurse availability [63.8% (27.9–90.7%)] and psychological support [62.7% (40.6–79.6%)]. In some countries, up to one third of healthcare professionals reported not having received any formal diabetes training. Societal discrimination against people with diabetes was reported by 32.8% (11.4–79.6%) of participants.Conclusions: This survey has highlighted concerns of healthcare professionals relating to diabetes healthcare provision, self‐management and training. Identifying between‐country differences in several areas will allow benchmarking and sharing of clinical practices.

Our aim was to determine the incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus in a nation-wide population based cohort from Spain (di@bet.es study). The target was the Spanish population. In total 5072 people older than 18 years,were randomly selected from all over Spain). Socio-demographic and clinical data, survey on habits (physical activity and food consumption) and weight, height, waist, hip and blood pressure were recorder. A fasting blood draw and an oral glucose tolerance test were performed. Determinations of serum glucose were made. In the follow-up the same variables were collected and HbA1c was determined. A total of 2408 subjects participated in the follow-up. In total, 154 people developed diabetes (6.4% cumulative incidence in 7.5 years of follow-up). The incidence of diabetes adjusted for the structure of age and sex of the Spanish population was 11.6 cases/1000 person-years (IC95% = 11.1–12.1). The incidence of known diabetes was 3.7 cases/1000 person-years (IC95% = 2.8–4.6). The main risk factors for developing diabetes were the presence of prediabetes in cross-sectional study, age, male sex, obesity, central obesity, increase in weight, and family history of diabetes. This work provides data about population-based incidence rates of diabetes and associated risk factors in a nation-wide cohort of Spanish population.

The purpose of this study was to determine the global patterns of aberrant DNA methylation in thyroid cancer. We have used DNA methylation arrays to determine, for the first time, the genome-wide promoter methylation status of papillary, follicular, medullary, and anaplastic thyroid tumors. We identified 262 and 352 hypermethylated and 13 and 21 hypomethylated genes in differentiated papillary and follicular tumors, respectively. Interestingly, the other tumor types analyzed displayed more hypomethylated genes (280 in anaplastic and 393 in medullary tumors) than aberrantly hypermethylated genes (86 in anaplastic and 131 in medullary tumors). Among the genes indentified, we show that 4 potential tumor suppressor genes (ADAMTS8, HOXB4, ZIC1, and KISS1R) and 4 potential oncogenes (INSL4, DPPA2, TCL1B, and NOTCH4) are frequently regulated by aberrant methylation in primary thyroid tumors. In addition, we show that aberrant promoter hypomethylation-associated overexpression of MAP17 might promote tumor growth in thyroid cancer. Thyroid cancer subtypes present differential promoter methylation signatures, and nondifferentiated subtypes are characterized by aberrant promoter hypomethylation rather than hypermethylation. Additional studies are needed to determine the potential clinical interest of the tumor subtype-specific DNA methylation signatures described herein and the role of aberrant promoter hypomethylation in nondifferentiated thyroid tumors.

OBJECTIVE: Premixed insulin is a commonly prescribed formulation for the outpatient management of patients with type 2 diabetes. The safety and efficacy of premixed insulin formulations in the hospital setting is not known. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In a prospective, open-label trial, we randomized general medicine and surgery patients to receive a basal-bolus regimen with glargine once daily and glulisine before meals (n = 33) or premixed human insulin (30% regular insulin and 70% NPH insulin) twice daily (n = 39). Major outcomes included differences in daily blood glucose (BG) levels and frequency of hypoglycemic events (50% in patients treated with premixed human insulin. A total of 64% of patients treated with premixed insulin experienced one or more episodes of hypoglycemia compared with 24% in the basal-bolus group (P < 0.001). There were no differences in mean daily BG level after the first day of insulin treatment (175 ± 32 vs. 179 ± 43 mg/dL, P = 0.64) between groups. A BG target between 80 and 180 mg/dL before meals was achieved in 55.9% of BG readings in the basal-bolus group and 54.3% of BG readings in the premixed insulin group (P = 0.23). There was no difference in the length of hospital stay or mortality between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Inpatient treatment with premixed human insulin resulted in similar glycemic control but in significantly higher frequency of hypoglycemia compared with treatment with basal-bolus insulin regimen in hospitalized patients with diabetes.