Miguel Lovino

Dr. Miguel Lovino

CEVARCAM - FICH - UNL, Conicet - CCT Santa Fe, Santa Fe, Argentina
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
8 February 2018 in International Journal of Climatology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MLMiguel Lovino
Miguel Lovino
OMOmar V. Müller
Omar V. Müller
EBErnesto H. Berbery
Ernesto H. Berbery
Gabriela MüllerGabriela Müller
Gabriela Müller
It is generally agreed that models that better simulate historical and current features of climate should also be the ones that more reliably simulate future climate. This article describes the ability of a selection of global climate models (GCMs) of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) to represent the historical and current mean climate and its variability over northeastern Argentina, a region that exhibits frequent extreme events. Two types of simulations are considered: Long‐term simulations for 1901–2005 in which the models respond to climate forcing (e.g. changes in atmospheric composition and land use) and decadal simulations for 1961–2010 that are initialized from observed climate states. Monthly simulations of precipitation and temperature are statistically evaluated for individual models and their ensembles.Subsets of models that best represent the region's climate are further examined. First, models that have a Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency of at least 0.8 are taken as a subset that best represents the observed temperature fields and the mean annual cycle. Their temperature time series are in phase with observations (r > 0.92), despite systematic errors that if desired can be corrected by statistical methods. Likewise, models that have a precipitation Pearson correlation coefficient of at least 0.6 are considered that best represent regional precipitation features. GCMs are able to reproduce the annual precipitation cycle, although they underestimate precipitation amounts during the austral warm season (September through April) and slightly overestimate the cold season rainfall amounts. The ensembles for the subsets of models achieve the best evaluation metrics, exceeding the performance of the overall ensembles as well as those of the individual models.

19 March 2024 in npj Climate and Atmospheric Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MLMiguel Lovino
Miguel Lovino
MPM. Josefina Pierrestegui
M. Josefina Pierrestegui
OMOmar V. Müller
Omar V. Müller
GMGabriela V. Müller
Gabriela V. Müller
EBErnesto H. Berbery
Ernesto H. Berbery
This work examines the characteristics and prevalent life cycle of agricultural flash droughts globally. Using ERA5 data, the study introduces a flash drought indicator based on soil water availability. This approach integrates root-zone soil moisture and hydraulic soil properties, such as field capacity and wilting point, to couple the rapid soil moisture depletion and plant water stress. Our findings reveal that agricultural flash droughts present their higher frequency predominantly during the critical growth periods of crops. Notably, these droughts exhibit a similar life cycle regardless of the location or climatic regime. The primary cause of the rapid soil moisture depletion is the precipitation deficit, but evapotranspiration also plays a significant role. In an energy-limited environment, evapotranspiration rapidly increases before the onset and decreases rapidly during the intensification period as the system becomes water-limited. Upon concluding the intensification period, most crops experience water stress, diminishing their yields.

17 May 2021 in Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Leandro SgroiLeandro Sgroi
Leandro Sgroi
MLMiguel Lovino
Miguel Lovino
EBErnesto Hugo Berbery
Ernesto Hugo Berbery
Gabriela MüllerGabriela Müller
Gabriela Müller
This study advances the understanding and impacts of dry episodes on wheat, corn, and soybean yields over Argentina's core crop region. The production of these major crops is intense and is the main contribution to the country's gross domestic product. Our analysis focuses on the droughts' properties, including their magnitude, frequency at different timescales, duration, and severity. We analyzed 40 years of precipitation and soil moisture anomalies and their corresponding nonparametric standardized indices at timescales of 1, 3, and 6 months. The climate variables were complemented with 40 years of the crops' yield data. The percentage of drought occurrence in northeastern Argentina ranges between 12 % and 18 %, with the larger values located towards the core crop region's eastern–northeastern sector. An analysis of drought duration suggests that most cases tend to occur for periods shorter than 3 months, while a few can extend up to 1 year, and even fewer can last longer. More importantly, regardless of the duration, droughts have larger impacts during the crops' critical growth period. Corn and soybean have their critical growth periods during summer and are more sensitive to precipitation and soil moisture deficits than wheat, which has its critical growth period during spring. Quantification of the relation between the droughts' indicators during the crops' critical periods and detrended annual crop yields was performed. Large drought severity values during the crop-sensitive months result in significant crop yield losses. Results suggest that shorter-scale indicators during sensitive periods are more appropriate for predicting crop yield losses than the longer-scale indicators. This new approach can be helpful for regional decision-making systems that support planning by water managers and agricultural stakeholders.

1 September 2018 in Global and Planetary Change
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MLMiguel Lovino
Miguel Lovino
OMOmar V. Müller
Omar V. Müller
EBErnesto H. Berbery
Ernesto H. Berbery
Gabriela MüllerGabriela Müller
Gabriela Müller

17 February 2021 in Climatic Change
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MLMiguel Lovino
Miguel Lovino
MPMaría Josefina Pierrestegui
María Josefina Pierrestegui
OMOmar V. Müller
Omar V. Müller
EBErnesto Hugo Berbery
Ernesto Hugo Berbery
Gabriela MüllerGabriela Müller
Gabriela Müller
MPMax Pasten
Max Pasten

6 June 2018 in Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MLMiguel Lovino
Miguel Lovino
OMOmar V. Müller
Omar V. Müller
Gabriela MüllerGabriela Müller
Gabriela Müller
Leandro SgroiLeandro Sgroi
Leandro Sgroi
Walter BaethgenWalter Baethgen
Walter Baethgen
This study examines the joint variability of precipitation, river streamflow and temperature over northeastern Argentina; advances the understanding of their links with global SST forcing; and discusses their impacts on water resources, agriculture and human settlements. The leading patterns of variability, and their nonlinear trends and cycles are identified by means of a principal component analysis (PCA) complemented with a singular spectrum analysis (SSA). Interannual hydroclimatic variability centers on two broad frequency bands: one of 2.5–6.5 years corresponding to El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO) periodicities and the second of about 9 years. The higher frequencies of the precipitation variability (2.5–4 years) favored extreme events after 2000, even during moderate extreme phases of the ENSO. Minimum temperature is correlated with ENSO with a main frequency close to 3 years. Maximum temperature time series correlate well with SST variability over the South Atlantic, Indian and Pacific oceans with a 9-year frequency. Interdecadal variability is characterized by low-frequency trends and multidecadal oscillations that have induced a transition from dryer and cooler climate to wetter and warmer decades starting in the mid-twentieth century. The Paraná River streamflow is influenced by North and South Atlantic SSTs with bidecadal periodicities. The hydroclimate variability at all timescales had significant sectoral impacts. Frequent wet events between 1970 and 2005 favored floods that affected agricultural and livestock productivity and forced population displacements. On the other hand, agricultural droughts resulted in soil moisture deficits that affected crops at critical growth stages. Hydrological droughts affected surface water resources, causing water and food scarcity and stressing the capacity for hydropower generation. Lastly, increases in minimum temperature reduced wheat and barley yields.