Adrianus Van Haandel

Dr. Adrianus Van Haandel

Federal University of Campina Grande, Campina Grande, Paraíba, Brazil

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
28 October 2013 in Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AHAdrianus Van Haandel
Adrianus Van Haandel
JVJo De Vrieze
Jo De Vrieze
WVWilly Verstraete
Willy Verstraete
VSVagner S. dos Santos
Vagner S. dos Santos

25 April 2021 in Water
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Silvânia SantosSilvânia Santos
Silvânia Santos
AHAdrianus Van Haandel
Adrianus Van Haandel
Waste Stabilization Ponds (WSPs) are commonly used for sewage treatment. These systems are composed of a series of ponds: (1) anaerobic ponds, (2) facultative ponds, and (3) maturation ponds. WSPs generally produce good-quality effluent in terms of organic matter and pathogen removal, but their application has disadvantages. The most serious disadvantages are a long retention time, the release of biogas, and the impossibility of removing nutrients. A promising alternative to the use of WSPs is replacing the anaerobic pond and facultative pond with an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor, with the advantages of greatly reducing the retention time and the biogas capture. The post-treatment ponds of the UASB reactor effluent involve oxygen production and the biological consumption of carbon dioxide, which raises the pH. An experimental investigation showed that it is possible to use polishing ponds in a sequential batch regime instead of continuous flow. This modification accelerates the decay of pathogens and accelerates the increase in pH, which, in turn, facilitates the removal of nitrogen and phosphorus. This produces a good-quality effluent with low concentrations of biodegradable organic material, nutrients, and pathogens. This good-quality effluent is obtained in a system without energy consumption or auxiliary materials and with a much smaller area than conventional stabilization ponds.

3 May 2016 in Water SA
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SSSilvânia Lucas Dos Santos
Silvânia Lucas Dos Santos
SCSílvia Raphaele Morais Chaves
Sílvia Raphaele Morais Chaves
AHAdrianus Van Haandel
Adrianus Van Haandel
Influence of phase separator design on the performance of UASB reactors treating municipal wastewater

25 April 2018 in Water SA
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SSSilvânia Lucas Dos Santos
Silvânia Lucas Dos Santos
SCSílvia Raphaele Morais Chaves
Sílvia Raphaele Morais Chaves
AHAdrianus Van Haandel
Adrianus Van Haandel
Anaerobic sewage treatment systems, especially upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactors, have found wide application over the past decades, particularly in regions with a warm climate. A low sewage temperature is generally considered as a factor contributing to poor performance, characterized by an increase of the COD fractions in the effluent and the generated sludge, and decreasing the fraction that is transformed into methane. An experimental investigation was carried out at pilot scale to establish the values of the three COD fractions for different values of temperature and the applied organic load. The sludge age of the anaerobic treatment, together with temperature, was identified as the main operational variable that affects the efficiency of anaerobic treatment. An empirical expression was derived for the values of the three factions as a function of these two variables. From the results of the experimental investigation it was apparent that there is no point in applying a sludge age of more than 100 d, when the reactor is near its best performance. An expression was derived to establish the hydraulic retention time for maximum digestion efficiency as a function of temperature, concentration and composition of organic material and sludge mass. It was established that the main limit to the sludge hold-up in UASB reactors treating sewage is not the sludge settleability, but rather the break-up of flocs leading to loss of small, poorly-settling particles.

1 January 2010 in International Journal of Environmental Science and Development
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SASunny Aiyuk
Sunny Aiyuk
POPhilip Odonkor
Philip Odonkor
NTNkoebe Theko
Nkoebe Theko
AHAdrianus Van Haandel
Adrianus Van Haandel
Willy VerstraeteWilly Verstraete
Willy Verstraete

4 June 2021 in Water
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SSSilvânia Lucas dos Santos
Silvânia Lucas dos Santos
AHAdrianus Van Haandel
Adrianus Van Haandel
One of the main problems of waste stabilization ponds (WSP) is that they cannot remove nutrients when treating wastewater. Polishing ponds (PP) can efficiently remove nitrogen and phosphorus from effluents after efficient anaerobic pretreatment. It shown that the feasibility of nutrient removal is directly related to the pH that is established in the ponds. WSP normally operate at near neutral pH, but the biological processes that develop in PP tend to cause an elevation of pH and this, in turn, triggers the mechanisms of nutrient removal in ponds. In PP oxygen production by photosynthesis predominates over the oxidation of organic material. The net oxygen production has an equivalent CO2 consumption and this induces an increase in pH. The mechanism for nitrogen removal was identified as the desorption of ammonia from the liquid phase of the ponds. It was established that in ponds with a uniform concentration profile in the liquid phase the process developed in accordance with Fick’s law. The governing mechanism of phosphorus removal was precipitation with ions present in the wastewater, presumably calcium and magnesium. Polishing ponds can be operated with two different hydrodynamic regimes: flow-through (FTPP) and sequential batch (SBPP) ponds. The SBPP have the advantage that the pH elevation is more rapid, and that the final pH is higher.