Adedeji Adebayo

Dr. Adedeji Adebayo

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 January 2021 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AKAditi Khatpe
Aditi Khatpe
AAAdedeji Adebayo
Adedeji Adebayo
CHChristopher A. Herodotou
Christopher A. Herodotou
BKBrijesh Kumar
Brijesh Kumar
HNHarikrishna Nakshatri
Harikrishna Nakshatri
Signaling from estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) and its ligand estradiol (E2) is critical for growth of ≈70% of breast cancers. Therefore, several drugs that inhibit ERα functions have been in clinical use for decades and new classes of anti-estrogens are continuously being developed. Although a significant number of ERα+ breast cancers respond to anti-estrogen therapy, ≈30% of these breast cancers recur, sometimes even after 20 years of initial diagnosis. Mechanism of resistance to anti-estrogens is one of the intensely studied disciplines in breast cancer. Several mechanisms have been proposed including mutations in ESR1, crosstalk between growth factor and ERα signaling, and interplay between cell cycle machinery and ERα signaling. ESR1 mutations as well as crosstalk with other signaling networks lead to ligand independent activation of ERα thus rendering anti-estrogens ineffective, particularly when treatment involved anti-estrogens that do not degrade ERα. As a result of these studies, several therapies that combine anti-estrogens that degrade ERα with PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors targeting growth factor signaling or CDK4/6 inhibitors targeting cell cycle machinery are used clinically to treat recurrent ERα+ breast cancers. In this review, we discuss the nexus between ERα-PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathways and how understanding of this nexus has helped to develop combination therapies.

14 January 2022 in Science Advances
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
BKBrijesh Kumar
Brijesh Kumar
AAAdedeji Adebayo
Adedeji Adebayo
MPMayuri Prasad
Mayuri Prasad
MCMaegan L. Capitano
Maegan L. Capitano
RWRuizhong Wang
Ruizhong Wang
HNHarikrishna Nakshatri
Harikrishna Nakshatri
Tumor tissue collection and processing under physioxia allow highly relevant detection of signaling networks and drug sensitivity.

9 August 2024 in Nature Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PBPoornima Bhat-Nakshatri
Poornima Bhat-Nakshatri
HGHongyu Gao
Hongyu Gao
AKAditi Khatpe
Aditi Khatpe
AAAdedeji Adebayo
Adedeji Adebayo
PMPatrick C. McGuire
Patrick C. McGuire
HNHarikrishna Nakshatri
Harikrishna Nakshatri
Single-nucleus analysis allows robust cell-type classification and helps to establish relationships between chromatin accessibility and cell-type-specific gene expression. Here, using samples from 92 women of several genetic ancestries, we developed a comprehensive chromatin accessibility and gene expression atlas of the breast tissue. Integrated analysis revealed ten distinct cell types, including three major epithelial subtypes (luminal hormone sensing, luminal adaptive secretory precursor (LASP) and basal-myoepithelial), two endothelial and adipocyte subtypes, fibroblasts, T cells, and macrophages. In addition to the known cell identity genes FOXA1 (luminal hormone sensing), EHF and ELF5 (LASP), TP63 and KRT14 (basal-myoepithelial), epithelial subtypes displayed several uncharacterized markers and inferred gene regulatory networks. By integrating breast epithelial cell gene expression signatures with spatial transcriptomics, we identified gene expression and signaling differences between lobular and ductal epithelial cells and age-associated changes in signaling networks. LASP cells and fibroblasts showed genetic ancestry-dependent variability. An estrogen receptor-positive subpopulation of LASP cells with alveolar progenitor cell state was enriched in women of Indigenous American ancestry. Fibroblasts from breast tissues of women of African and European ancestry clustered differently, with accompanying gene expression differences. Collectively, these data provide a vital resource for further exploring genetic ancestry-dependent variability in healthy breast biology.

11 November 2019 in Environmental Toxicology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AOAdemola Oyagbemi
Ademola Oyagbemi
OAOlamide E. Adebiyi
Olamide E. Adebiyi
KAKabirat O. Adigun
Kabirat O. Adigun
BOBlessing S. Ogunpolu
Blessing S. Ogunpolu
OFOlufunke O. Falayi
Olufunke O. Falayi
MYMomoh A. Yakubu
Momoh A. Yakubu

28 September 2022 in Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AAAdedeji Adebayo
Adedeji Adebayo
HNHarikrishna Nakshatri
Harikrishna Nakshatri
Oxygen (O2) plays a key role in cellular homeostasis. O2 levels are tightly regulated in vivo such that each tissue receives an optimal amount to maintain physiologic status. Physiologic O2 levels in various organs range between 2% and 9% in vivo, with the highest levels of 9% in the kidneys and the lowest of 0.5% in parts of the brain. This physiologic range of O2 tensions is disrupted in pathologic conditions such as cancer, where it can reach as low as 0.5%. Regardless of the state, O2 tension in vivo is maintained at significantly lower levels than ambient O2, which is approximately 21%. Yet, routine in vitro cellular manipulations are carried out in ambient air, regardless of whether or not they are eventually transferred to hypoxic conditions for subsequent studies. Even brief exposure of hematopoietic stem cells to ambient air can cause detrimental effects through a mechanism termed extraphysiologic oxygen shock/stress (EPHOSS), leading to reduced engraftment capabilities. Here, we provide an overview of the effects of ambient air exposure on stem and non-stem cell subtypes, with a focus on recent findings that reveal the impact of EPHOSS on cancer cells.

15 May 2024 in Cancer Research Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RWRuizhong Wang
Ruizhong Wang
AKAditi Khatpe
Aditi Khatpe
BKBrijesh Kumar
Brijesh Kumar
HMHenry Elmer Mang
Henry Elmer Mang
KBKatie Batic
Katie Batic
HNHarikrishna Nakshatri
Harikrishna Nakshatri
Cancer-induced skeletal muscle defects differ in severity between individuals with the same cancer type. Cancer subtype-specific genomic aberrations are suggested to mediate these differences, but experimental validation studies are very limited. We utilized three different breast cancer patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models to correlate cancer subtype with skeletal muscle defects. PDXs were derived from brain metastasis of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), estrogen receptor–positive/progesterone receptor–positive (ER+/PR+) primary breast cancer from a BRCA2-mutation carrier, and pleural effusion from an ER+/PR− breast cancer. While impaired skeletal muscle function as measured through rotarod performance and reduced levels of circulating and/or skeletal muscle miR-486 were common across all three PDXs, only TNBC-derived PDX activated phospho-p38 in skeletal muscle. To further extend these results, we generated transformed variants of human primary breast epithelial cells from healthy donors using HRASG12V or PIK3CAH1047R mutant oncogenes. Mutations in RAS oncogene or its modulators are found in approximately 37% of metastatic breast cancers, which is often associated with skeletal muscle defects. Although cells transformed with both oncogenes generated adenocarcinomas in NSG mice, only HRASG12V-derived tumors caused skeletal muscle defects affecting rotarod performance, skeletal muscle contraction force, and miR-486, Pax7, pAKT, and p53 levels in skeletal muscle. Circulating levels of the chemokine CXCL1 were elevated only in animals with tumors containing HRASG12V mutation. Because RAS pathway aberrations are found in 19% of cancers, evaluating skeletal muscle defects in the context of genomic aberrations in cancers, particularly RAS pathway mutations, may accelerate development of therapeutic modalities to overcome cancer-induced systemic effects. Significance: Mutant RAS- and PIK3CA-driven breast cancers distinctly affect the function of skeletal muscle. Therefore, research and therapeutic targeting of cancer-induced systemic effects need to take aberrant cancer genome into consideration.