Patrizio Dimitri

Prof. Patrizio Dimitri

Department of Biology and Biotechnology “Charles Darwin”, Laboratory of Epigenetics, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 December 2004 in BioEssays
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Patrizio DimitriPatrizio Dimitri
Patrizio Dimitri
NCNicoletta Corradini
Nicoletta Corradini
FRFabrizio Rossi
Fabrizio Rossi
FVFiammetta Vernì
Fiammetta Vernì

1 September 2019 in Trends in Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RMRené Marsano
René Marsano
EGEnnio Giordano
Ennio Giordano
Giovanni MessinaGiovanni Messina
Giovanni Messina
Patrizio DimitriPatrizio Dimitri
Patrizio Dimitri

2 May 2009 in Chromosoma
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Patrizio DimitriPatrizio Dimitri
Patrizio Dimitri
RCRuggiero Caizzi
Ruggiero Caizzi
EGEnnio Giordano
Ennio Giordano
MAMaria Carmela Accardo
Maria Carmela Accardo
Giovanna LattanziGiovanna Lattanzi
Giovanna Lattanzi
Giuseppe BiamontiGiuseppe Biamonti
Giuseppe Biamonti

11 August 2016 in PLOS Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RCRuggiero Caizzi
Ruggiero Caizzi
RMRoberta Moschetti
Roberta Moschetti
LPLucia Piacentini
Lucia Piacentini
Laura FantiLaura Fanti
Laura Fanti
RMRené Marsano
René Marsano
Patrizio DimitriPatrizio Dimitri
Patrizio Dimitri
The term heterochromatin has been long considered synonymous with gene silencing, but it is now clear that the presence of transcribed genes embedded in pericentromeric heterochromatin is a conserved feature in the evolution of eukaryotic genomes. Several studies have addressed the epigenetic changes that enable the expression of genes in pericentric heterochromatin, yet little is known about the evolutionary processes through which this has occurred. By combining genome annotation analysis and high-resolution cytology, we have identified and mapped 53 orthologs of D. melanogaster heterochromatic genes in the genomes of two evolutionarily distant species, D. pseudoobscura and D. virilis. Our results show that the orthologs of the D. melanogaster heterochromatic genes are clustered at three main genomic regions in D. virilis and D. pseudoobscura. In D. virilis, the clusters lie in the middle of euchromatin, while those in D. pseudoobscura are located in the proximal portion of the chromosome arms. Some orthologs map to the corresponding Muller C element in D. pseudoobscura and D. virilis, while others localize on the Muller B element, suggesting that chromosomal rearrangements that have been instrumental in the fusion of two separate elements involved the progenitors of genes currently located in D. melanogaster heterochromatin. These results demonstrate an evolutionary repositioning of gene clusters from ancestral locations in euchromatin to the pericentromeric heterochromatin of descendent D. melanogaster chromosomes. Remarkably, in both D. virilis and D. pseudoobscura the gene clusters show a conserved association with the HP1a protein, one of the most highly evolutionarily conserved epigenetic marks. In light of these results, we suggest a new scenario whereby ancestral HP1-like proteins (and possibly other epigenetic marks) may have contributed to the evolutionary repositioning of gene clusters into heterochromatin. This study concerns the evolutionary dynamics underlying the emergence of heterochromatic single-copy genes in D. melanogaster heterochromatin. By combining genome annotation analysis and high-resolution cytology, we have performed a comparative mapping of the orthologs of 53 single-copy genes of D. melanogaster heterochromatin, in the genomes of D. pseudoobscura and D. virilis evolutionarily distant species. The results of our work are consistent with a scenario where the D. melanogaster heterochromatin genes arose through an evolutionary repositioning from a euchromatic location (D. virilis) to heterochromatin, passing through an intermediate location in regions associated with distal heterochromatin (D. pseudoobscura). The previously unanticipated observation, that in both D. virilis and D. pseudoobscura the gene clusters show a striking association with the HP1a protein, is remarkable in that it implies that the HP1 epigenetic mark may have contributed to the the success of repositioning of genes to pericentromeric heterochromatin by protecting them against silencing effects.

22 February 2022 in Cells
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RMRené Marsano
René Marsano
Patrizio DimitriPatrizio Dimitri
Patrizio Dimitri
Transposable elements (TEs) are abundant components of constitutive heterochromatin of the most diverse evolutionarily distant organisms. TEs enrichment in constitutive heterochromatin was originally described in the model organism Drosophila melanogaster, but it is now considered as a general feature of this peculiar portion of the genomes. The phenomenon of TE enrichment in constitutive heterochromatin has been proposed to be the consequence of a progressive accumulation of transposable elements caused by both reduced recombination and lack of functional genes in constitutive heterochromatin. However, this view does not take into account classical genetics studies and most recent evidence derived by genomic analyses of heterochromatin in Drosophila and other species. In particular, the lack of functional genes does not seem to be any more a general feature of heterochromatin. Sequencing and annotation of Drosophila melanogaster constitutive heterochromatin have shown that this peculiar genomic compartment contains hundreds of transcriptionally active genes, generally larger in size than that of euchromatic ones. Together, these genes occupy a significant fraction of the genomic territory of heterochromatin. Moreover, transposable elements have been suggested to drive the formation of heterochromatin by recruiting HP1 and repressive chromatin marks. In addition, there are several pieces of evidence that transposable elements accumulation in the heterochromatin might be important for centromere and telomere structure. Thus, there may be more complexity to the relationship between transposable elements and constitutive heterochromatin, in that different forces could drive the dynamic of this phenomenon. Among those forces, preferential transposition may be an important factor. In this article, we present an overview of experimental findings showing cases of transposon enrichment into the heterochromatin and their positive evolutionary interactions with an impact to host genomes.

5 March 2003 in Molecular Biology and Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Patrizio DimitriPatrizio Dimitri
Patrizio Dimitri
NJNikolaj Junakovic
Nikolaj Junakovic
Bruno ArcàBruno Arcà
Bruno Arcà
As a further step toward understanding transposable element–host genome interactions, we investigated the molecular anatomy of introns from five heterochromatic and 22 euchromatic protein-coding genes of Drosophila melanogaster. A total of 79 kb of intronic sequences from heterochromatic genes and 355 kb of intronic sequences from euchromatic genes have been used in Blast searches against Drosophila transposable elements (TEs). The results show that TE-homologous sequences belonging to 19 different families represent about 50% of intronic DNA from heterochromatic genes. In contrast, only 0.1% of the euchromatic intron DNA exhibits homology to known TEs. Intraspecific and interspecific size polymorphisms of introns were found, which are likely to be associated with changes in TE-related sequences. Together, the enrichment in TEs and the apparent dynamic state of heterochromatic introns suggest that TEs contribute significantly to the evolution of genes located in heterochromatin.