David G. Gee, Haakon Fossen, Niels Henriksen, and Anthony K. Higgins. Episodes 2008;31:44-51. https://doi.org/10.18814/epiiugs/2008/v31i1/007

Seismic interpretations are, by definition, subjective and often require significant time and expertise from the interpreter. We are convinced that machine-learning techniques can help address these problems by performing seismic facies analyses in a rigorous, repeatable way. For this purpose, we use state-of-the-art 3D broadband seismic reflection data of the northern North Sea. Our workflow includes five basic steps. First, we extract seismic attributes to highlight features in the data. Second, we perform a manual seismic facies classification on 10,000 examples. Third, we use some of these examples to train a range of models to predict seismic facies. Fourth, we analyze the performance of these models on the remaining examples. Fifth, we select the “best” model (i.e., highest accuracy) and apply it to a seismic section. As such, we highlight that machine-learning techniques can increase the efficiency of seismic facies analyses.

The northern North Sea rift basin developed on a heterogeneous crust comprising structures inherited from the Caledonian orogeny and Devonian postorogenic extension. Integrating two‐dimensional regional seismic reflection data and information from basement wells, we investigate the prerift structural configuration in the northern North Sea rift. Three seismic facies have been defined below the base rift surface: (1) relatively low‐amplitude and low‐frequency reflections, interpreted as pre‐Caledonian metasediments, Caledonian nappes, and/or Devonian clastic sediments; (2) packages of high‐amplitude dipping reflections (>500 ms thick), interpreted as basement shear zones; and (3) medium‐amplitude and high‐frequency reflections interpreted as less sheared crystalline basement of Proterozoic and Paleozoic (Caledonian) origin. Some zones of Seismic Facies 2 can be linked to onshore Devonian shear zones, whereas others are restricted to the offshore rift area. Interpreted offshore shear zones dip S, ESE, and WNW in contrast to W to NW dipping shear zones onshore West Norway. Our results indicate that Devonian strain and ductile deformation was distributed throughout the Caledonian orogenic belt from central South Norway to the Shetland Platform. Most of the Devonian basins related to this extension are, however, removed by erosion during subsequent exhumation. Basement shear zones reactivated during the rifting and locally control the location and geometry of rift depocenters, e.g., in the Stord and East Shetland basins. Prerift structures with present‐day dips >15° were reactivated, although some of the basement shear zones are displaced by rift faults regardless of their orientation relative to rift extension direction.

Deformation bands represent a common type of strain localization in deformed porous sandstones and occur as single structures, as clusters, and in fault damage zones. They show from zero to six orders of magnitude reduction in permeability and may therefore potentially affect fluid flow. We here present mathematical calculations indicating that uncommonly high permeability contrasts and/or exceptionally high band concentrations are required for deformation bands to significantly affect production rate. We also present field observations showing rapid variations in porosity and permeability along deformation bands and deformation-band zones alike. Furthermore, many paleofluid fronts seen in the field are unaffected or only gently affected by deformation bands. Together, these calculations and observations suggest that their function during reservoir production is small or negligible in most cases. Structural complications caused by subseismic faulting and complex fault anatomy are more likely to cause production problems, in addition to stratigraphic and diagenetic effects. Nevertheless, the arrangement and orientation of deformation bands may have an effect on the flow pattern and reservoir sweep. In cases where deformation bands do cause production problems, it may be possible to resolve these by means of hydraulic fracturing.

The northern North Sea rift evolved through multiple rift phases within a highly heterogeneous crystalline basement. The geometry and evolution of syn‐rift depocenters during this multiphase evolution and the mechanisms and extent to which they were influenced by preexisting structural heterogeneities remain elusive, particularly at the regional scale. Using an extensive database of borehole‐constrained 2D seismic reflection data, we examine how the physiography of the northern North Sea rift evolved throughout late Permian‐Early Triassic (RP1) and Late Jurassic‐Early Cretaceous (RP2) rift phases, and assess the influence of basement structures related to the Caledonian orogeny and subsequent Devonian extension. During RP1, the location of major depocenters, the Stord and East Shetland basins, was controlled by favorably oriented Devonian shear zones. RP2 shows a diminished influence from structural heterogeneities, activity localizes along the Viking‐Sogn graben system and the East Shetland Basin, with negligible activity in the Stord Basin and Horda Platform. The Utsira High and the Devonian Lomre Shear Zone form the eastern barrier to rift activity during RP2. Toward the end of RP2, rift activity migrated northward as extension related to opening of the proto‐North Atlantic becomes the dominant regional stress as rift activity in the northern North Sea decreases. Through documenting the evolving syn‐rift depocenters of the northern North Sea rift, we show how structural heterogeneities and prior rift phases influence regional rift physiography and kinematics, controlling the segmentation of depocenters, as well as the locations, styles, and magnitude of fault activity and reactivation during subsequent events.