Renzo CORVO

Renzo CORVO

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

41Years (1986-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
27 January 2021 in Radiotherapy and Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BLBenjamin Lacas
Benjamin Lacas
ACAlexandra Carmel
Alexandra Carmel
CLCécile Landais
Cécile Landais
SWStuart J. Wong
Stuart J. Wong
LLLisa Licitra
Lisa Licitra
BZB. Zackrisson
B. Zackrisson

1 September 2017 in The Lancet Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BLBenjamin Lacas
Benjamin Lacas
Jean BourhisJean Bourhis
Jean Bourhis
JOJens Overgaard
Jens Overgaard
QZQiang Zhang
Qiang Zhang
MNMatthew Nankivell
Matthew Nankivell
JWJonn S Wu
Jonn S Wu

15 October 1992 in New England Journal of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MMMarco Merlano
Marco Merlano
VVVito Vitale
Vito Vitale
RRRiccardo Rosso
Riccardo Rosso
MBMarco Benasso
Marco Benasso
RCRenzo CORVO
Renzo CORVO
LSLeonardo Santi
Leonardo Santi
For patients with advanced, unresectable squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck, radiotherapy is the standard treatment but has poor results. We therefore designed a randomized trial to determine whether alternating chemotherapy with radiotherapy would improve the survival of such patients.

1 May 1996 in JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MMMarco Merlano
Marco Merlano
MBMarco Benasso
Marco Benasso
RCRenzo CORVO
Renzo CORVO
RRRiccardo Rosso
Riccardo Rosso
VVVito Vitale
Vito Vitale
LSLeonardo Santi
Leonardo Santi
In 1992, we reported the first analysis of a randomized trial comparing alternating radiotherapy and chemotherapy with radiotherapy alone in the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. The results of that 3-year analysis indicated that the combined treatment had superior efficacy. After an additional 2 years of follow-up, we again compared the efficacy of the two treatment regimens, with attention paid to differences in overall survival, progression-free survival, and locoregional relapse-free survival. One hundred fifty-seven patients with untreated, unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were randomly assigned to receive either chemotherapy (four courses of cisplatin [20 mg/m 2 ] and fluorouracil [200 mg/m 2 ], given daily for 5 consecutive days during weeks 1, 4, 7, and 10) plus radiotherapy (three courses of 20 Gy each, given in fractions of 2 Gy per day during weeks 2–3, 5–6, and 8–9) or radiotherapy alone (70 Gy total dose, given in fractions of 2 Gy per day, 5 days per week). Eighty patients received the combined therapy, and 77 were treated with radiotherapy alone. Responses, failures, and toxic effects associated with the two treatment regimens were compared. Overall survival, progression-free survival, and locoregional relapse-free survival were calculated according to the Kaplan-Meier method; the logrank test was used to compare survival parameters between the two patient groups. Reported P values are two-sided. As reported previously, toxic effects associated with the combined therapy included both chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-related effects; however, the incidence and severity of mucositis were nearly identical among patients in the two treatment arms. The combined treatment was associated with a statistically significant increase in the frequency of complete response (i.e., the disappearance of clinically detectable disease for at least 4 weeks) (43% for the combined-treatment group compared with 22% for the radiotherapy-only group; P =.037, chi-squared test). Five-year estimates of overall survival in the combined-treatment group compared with the radiotherapy-only group were 24% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 14%–40%) and 10% (95% CI = 4%–24%), respectively ( P =.01, logrank test). The estimates of progression-free survival at 5 years in the combined-treatment group compared with the radiotherapy-only group were 21% (95% CI = 11%–37%) and 9% (95% CI = 3%–22%), respectively ( P =.008, logrank test). Finally, the 5-year estimates of locoregional relapse-free survival were 64% (95% CI = 36%–84%) in the combined-treatment group and 32% (95% CI = 10%–65%) in the radiotherapy-only group ( P =.038, logrank test). Conclusions and Implications : The superiority of alternating chemotherapy and radiotherapy over radiotherapy alone in treating unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck seen at 3 years was confirmed at 5 years. However, additional trials must be conducted before considering the combined approach as standard therapy. [J Natl Cancer Inst 1996; 88: 583–9]

10 February 2016 in Journal of Clinical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SMStefano Maria Magrini
Stefano Maria Magrini
MBMichela Buglione
Michela Buglione
RCRenzo CORVO
Renzo CORVO
LPLuigi Pirtoli
Luigi Pirtoli
FPFabiola Paiar
Fabiola Paiar
SGSalvatore Grisanti
Salvatore Grisanti
Purpose: No randomized trials have been conducted to directly compare radiotherapy (RT) with concomitant cisplatin (CDDP) versus concomitant cetuximab (CTX) as first-line treatment of locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. In this randomized trial, we compared these two treatment regimens in terms of compliance, toxicity, and efficacy. Patients and Methods: Eligible patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either CDDP 40 mg/m2 once per week or CTX 400 mg/m2 as loading dose followed by CTX 250 mg/m2 once per week concomitant to radical RT. For primary end points, compliance to treatment was defined as number of days of treatment discontinuation and drug dosage reduction. The acute toxicity rate was defined according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria. Efficacy end points were local recurrence-free survival, metastasis-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival. Results: The study was discontinued early because of slow accrual after the enrollment of 70 patients. RT discontinuation for more than 10 days occurred in 13% of patients given CTX and 0% given CDDP (P = .05). Drug dosage reduction occurred in 34% given CTX and 53% given CDDP (difference not significant). Toxicity profiles differed between the two arms, with hematologic, renal, and GI toxicities more frequent in the CDDP arm, and cutaneous toxicity and the need for nutritional support more frequent in the CTX arm. Serious adverse events related to treatment, including four versus one toxic deaths, were higher in the CTX arm (19% v 3%, P = .044). Locoregional control, patterns of failure, and survivals were similar between the treatment arms. Conclusion: CTX concomitant to RT lowered compliance and increased acute toxicity rates. Efficacy outcomes were similar in both arms. These results raise the issue of appropriately selecting patients with head and neck cancer who can benefit from CTX in combination with RT.

1 October 2007 in Radiotherapy and Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RCRenzo CORVO
Renzo CORVO