Ultra-processed food [UPF] consumption has been linked to globally increasing incidence and prevalence of chronic diseases, including inflammatory bowel diseases [IBD]. We aimed to investigate the association between UPF consumption and IBD incidence, prevalence, and IBD-relevant outcomes. We performed a cross-sectional and prospective cohort study in 187 854 individuals included in the national UK Biobank, using 24-h dietary recall questionnaires. Multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard regression were used to examine the association between UPFs and the prevalence and incidence risk of IBD, respectively. A total of 185 849 participants with a mean age of 56.2 were included, with a mean follow-up of 9.84 years. During follow-up, 841 developed IBD (251 Crohn’s disease [CD], and 590 ulcerative colitis [UC]). UPF intake in IBD patients was significantly higher: CD: odds ratio [OR] 1.94 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.52, 2.49, p <0.001); UC: OR 1.39 [95% CI: 1.17, 1.65, p <0.001]. Compared with low consumption, higher UPF consumption was significantly associated with incident CD: hazard ration [HR] 2.00 [95% CI: 1.32, 3.03, p = 0.001], but not UC. We also found a significant association between UPF intake and need of IBD-related surgery: HR 4.06 [95% CI: 1.52, 10.86, p = 0.005]. Higher intake of UPFs was associated with higher incidence of CD, but not UC. In individuals with a pre-existing diagnosis of IBD, consumption of UPFs was significantly higher compared with controls, and was associated with an increased need for IBD-related surgery. Further studies are needed to address the impact of UPF intake on disease pathogenesis and outcomes.

This work aims to investigate how smoking exerts effect on the development of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). A prospective cohort study and a Mendelian randomization study are first conducted to evaluate the association between smoking behaviors, smoking-related DNA methylation and the risks of Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). We then perform both genome-wide methylation analysis and co-localization analysis to validate the observed associations. Compared to never smoking, current and previous smoking habits are associated with increased CD (P = 7.09 × 10⁻¹⁰) and UC (P < 2 × 10⁻¹⁶) risk, respectively. DNA methylation alteration at cg17742416 [DNMT3A] is linked to both CD (P = 7.30 × 10⁻⁸) and UC (P = 1.04 × 10⁻⁴) risk, while cg03599224 [LTA/TNF] is associated with CD risk (P = 1.91 × 10⁻⁶), and cg14647125 [AHRR] and cg23916896 [AHRR] are linked to UC risk (P = 0.001 and 0.002, respectively). Our study identifies biological mechanisms and pathways involved in the effects of smoking on the pathogenesis of IBD.

The role of immune responses to previously seen endemic coronavirus epitopes in severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and disease progression has not yet been determined. Here, we show that a key characteristic of fatal outcomes with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is that the immune response to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein is enriched for antibodies directed against epitopes shared with endemic beta-coronaviruses and has a lower proportion of antibodies targeting the more protective variable regions of the spike. The magnitude of antibody responses to the SARS-CoV-2 full-length spike protein, its domains and subunits, and the SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid also correlated strongly with responses to the endemic beta-coronavirus spike proteins in individuals admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) with fatal COVID-19 outcomes, but not in individuals with nonfatal outcomes. This correlation was found to be due to the antibody response directed at the S2 subunit of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, which has the highest degree of conservation between the beta-coronavirus spike proteins. Intriguingly, antibody responses to the less cross-reactive SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid were not significantly different in individuals who were admitted to an ICU with fatal and nonfatal outcomes, suggesting an antibody profile in individuals with fatal outcomes consistent with an “original antigenic sin” type response.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is an emerging global disease characterised by chronic inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract. However, IBD is also manifested by several extraintestinal symptoms which, along with the intestinal symptoms, impact on the mental and emotional well-being of patients. Despite therapeutic advancements, only one-third of the diagnosed patients receiving approved medical treatments achieve short-term to medium-term remission. Consequently, patients who do not get successfully treated might resort to using complementary and alternative approaches to manage their symptoms, with or without consulting their treating clinician. Despite their possible potential, such approaches have various risks stemming from unknown adverse reactions and possible interference with medically approved therapies. In this study, we present the results of a well-performed literature review where we included randomised clinical trials which have assessed the efficacy of complementary approaches and dietary therapy on at least one of the following four outcomes: clinical remission, endoscopic remission, modulation of molecular biomarkers or quality of life metrics. By pointing out intraoutcome and interoutcome concordance, we identified possible candidates for clinical adoption and further study in larger randomised clinical trials covering the broad spectrum of IBD heterogeneity. We finally proposed a patient-centric clinical care model and a series of recommendations for stakeholders, with special attention to complementary approaches and dietary strategies, aimed at achieving holistic remission.

Many patients with IBD report persisting symptoms, despite resolution of the inflammatory process. Although by definition, a diagnosis of IBS cannot be made, the prevalence of ‘IBS in IBD’ surpasses the rate of IBS in the global population by fivefold. Because IBS-like symptoms are associated with a decreased quality of life and increased healthcare utilisation in IBD, diagnosis and treatment are necessary. In this review, we summarise the current knowledge on IBS-like symptoms in IBD. A pathophysiological common ground is present, which includes genetic susceptibility, environmental triggers, gut microbial dysbiosis, increased intestinal permeability, visceral hypersensitivity and involvement of brain–gut interaction. When symptoms persist after resolution of inflammation, other GI diseases should be excluded based on the chief complaint, considering any possible psychological co-morbidity early in the diagnostic work-up. Subsequent treatment should be initiated that is evidence-based and often multimodal, including classical and non-classical pharmacological agents as well as lifestyle and microbiota-based approaches, spanning the breadth of the gut, brain and its interaction. Treatment goals in this substantial part of the IBD population should be adapted to not only focus on treating the inflammation but taking care of the patient.

Since the beginning of the pandemic, patients with inflammatory bowel diseases [IBD] have been considered at high risk for infection and complications of COVID-19. IBD patients and patients taking immunosuppressive therapy were excluded from clinical phase III vaccine trials, complicating the assessment of effectiveness of these new vaccines. From past experience we know that adapted vaccination strategies may be appropriate in some IBD patients to optimise immunogenicity. We review current evidence on SARS-CoV-2 vaccination relevant to IBD patients, including immune responses from humoral to cellular, emerging data on new variants, and off-label vaccination schemes. We also identify clinical and scientific knowledge gaps that can be translated into both large-scale population-based studies and targeted vaccine studies to describe the precise immune responses induced by SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in IBD patients. We strongly endorse the recommendation of vaccinating IBD patients to ensure maximal protection from COVID-19 both for the individual and the community.