Erno Lehtinen

Prof. Erno Lehtinen

University of Turku, Finland
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

39Years (1988-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
26 July 2011 in Educational Psychology Review
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Andreas GegenfurtnerAndreas Gegenfurtner
Andreas Gegenfurtner
ELErno Lehtinen
Erno Lehtinen
RSRoger Säljö
Roger Säljö

1 June 2011 in Learning and Instruction
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TITuike Iiskala
Tuike Iiskala
MVMarja Vauras
Marja Vauras
ELErno Lehtinen
Erno Lehtinen
PSPekka Salonen
Pekka Salonen

1 June 2005 in Learning and Instruction
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MHMinna M. Hannula
Minna M. Hannula
ELErno Lehtinen
Erno Lehtinen

1 December 2010 in Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MHMinna M. Hannula
Minna M. Hannula
JLJanne Lepola
Janne Lepola
ELErno Lehtinen
Erno Lehtinen

1 January 2019 in Computers & Education
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BBBoglárka Brezovszky
Boglárka Brezovszky
JMJake McMullen
Jake McMullen
KVKoen Veermans
Koen Veermans
MHMinna M. Hannula-Sormunen
Minna M. Hannula-Sormunen
GRGabriela Rodríguez-Aflecht
Gabriela Rodríguez-Aflecht
ELErno Lehtinen
Erno Lehtinen

17 December 2019 in ZDM – Mathematics Education
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NPNonmanut Pongsakdi
Nonmanut Pongsakdi
AKAnu Kajamies
Anu Kajamies
KVKoen Veermans
Koen Veermans
KLKalle Lertola
Kalle Lertola
MVMarja Vauras
Marja Vauras
ELErno Lehtinen
Erno Lehtinen
In this study we investigated word-problem (WP) item characteristics, individual differences in text comprehension and arithmetic skills, and their relations to mathematical WP-solving. The participants were 891 fourth-grade students from elementary schools in Finland. Analyses were conducted in two phases. In the first phase, WP characteristics concerning linguistic and numerical factors and their difficulty level were investigated. In contrast to our expectations, the results did not show a clear connection between WP difficulty level and their other characteristics regarding linguistic and numerical factors. In the second phase, text comprehension and arithmetic skills were used to classify participants into four groups: skilful in text comprehension but poor in arithmetic; poor in text comprehension but skilful in arithmetic; very poor in both skills; very skilful in both skills. The results indicated that WP-solving performance on both easy and difficult items was strongly related to text comprehension and arithmetic skills. In easy items, the students who were poor in text comprehension but skilful in arithmetic performed better than those who were skilful in text comprehension but poor in arithmetic. However, there were no differences between these two groups in WP-solving performance on difficult items, showing that more challenging WPs require both skills from students.