The once-daily, all oral, RBV-free, pangenotypic direct-acting anti-viral regimen consisting of co-formulated NS3/4A protease inhibitor glecaprevir and NS5A inhibitor pibrentasvir (G/P), demonstrated high rates of sustained virologic response (SVR) in phase 2 and 3 studies outside Japan.

Glecaprevir (nonstructural protein 3/4A protease inhibitor) and pibrentasvir (nonstructural protein 5A inhibitor) (G/P), a coformulated once‐daily, all oral, ribavirin (RBV)‐free, direct‐acting antiviral regimen, was evaluated for safety and efficacy in hepatitis C virus genotype 2 (GT2)–infected Japanese patients, including those with compensated cirrhosis. CERTAIN‐2 is a phase 3, open‐label, multicenter study assessing the safety and efficacy of G/P (300/120 mg) once daily in treatment‐naive and interferon ± RBV treatment–experienced Japanese patients without cirrhosis but with GT2 infection. Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive 8 weeks of G/P (arm A) or 12 weeks of sofosbuvir (400 mg once daily) + RBV (600‐1000 mg weight‐based, twice daily) (arm B). The primary endpoint was noninferiority of G/P compared to sofosbuvir + RBV by assessing sustained virologic response at posttreatment week 12 (SVR12) among patients in the intent‐to‐treat population. SVR12 was also assessed in treatment‐naive and interferon ± RBV treatment‐experienced patients with GT2 infection and compensated cirrhosis who received G/P for 12 weeks in the CERTAIN‐1 study. A total of 136 patients were enrolled in CERTAIN‐2. SVR12 was achieved by 88/90 (97.8%) patients in arm A and 43/46 (93.5%) patients in arm B. No patient in arm A experienced virologic failure, while 2 did in arm B. The primary endpoint was achieved. In CERTAIN‐1, 100% (18/18) of GT2‐infected patients with compensated cirrhosis achieved SVR12. Treatment‐emergent serious adverse events were experienced by 2 patients without cirrhosis in each arm and no patient with cirrhosis. Conclusion: The results demonstrate high efficacy and favorable tolerability of G/P in GT2‐infected Japanese patients. (Hepatology 2018;67:505‐513).

The aim of this retrospective proof-of-concept study was to compare different second-line treatments for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and progressive disease (PD) after first-line lenvatinib or atezolizumab plus bevacizumab. A total of 1381 patients had PD at first-line therapy. 917 patients received lenvatinib as first-line treatment, and 464 patients atezolizumab plus bevacizumab as first-line. 49.6% of PD patients received a second-line therapy without any statistical difference in overall survival (OS) between lenvatinib (20.6months) and atezolizumab plus bevacizumab first-line (15.7months; p = 0.12; hazard ratio [HR]= 0.80). After lenvatinib first-line, there wasn't any statistical difference between second-line therapy subgroups (p = 0.27; sorafenib HR: 1; immunotherapy HR: 0.69; other therapies HR: 0.85). Patients who underwent trans-arterial chemo-embolization (TACE) had a significative longer OS than patients who received sorafenib (24.7 versus 15.8months, p < 0.01; HR=0.64). After atezolizumab plus bevacizumab first-line, there was a statistical difference between second-line therapy subgroups (p < 0.01; sorafenib HR: 1; lenvatinib HR: 0.50; cabozantinib HR: 1.29; other therapies HR: 0.54). Patients who received lenvatinib (17.0months) and those who underwent TACE (15.9months) had a significative longer OS than patients treated with sorafenib (14.2months; respectively, p = 0.01; HR=0.45, and p < 0.05; HR=0.46). Approximately half of patients receiving first-line lenvatinib or atezolizumab plus bevacizumab access second-line treatment. Our data suggest that in patients progressed to atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, the systemic therapy able to achieve the longest survival is lenvatinib, while in patients progressed to lenvatinib, the systemic therapy able to achieve the longest survival is immunotherapy.