Jensen Per H.

Prof. Jensen Per H.

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2014 in Journal of Aging Studies
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PFPatricia Frericks
Patricia Frericks
JHJensen Per H.
Jensen Per H.
BPBirgit Pfau-Effinger
Birgit Pfau-Effinger

7 April 2016 in International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
STSannie Vester Thorsen
Sannie Vester Thorsen
JHJensen Per H.
Jensen Per H.
JBJakob Bue Bjørner
Jakob Bue Bjørner

21 January 2013 in Journal of Social Policy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JHJensen Per H.
Jensen Per H.
HLHenrik Lolle
Henrik Lolle
Much research focusing on the welfare state is based on the assumption that welfare regimes are homogenous entities. This idea is supported by studies analysing cash benefits. In the area of welfare services, however, local governments in most countries have some autonomy regarding policy formation as well as the design and implementation of policies. In practice, substantial local differences exist with regard to the provision of welfare services, which in turn challenge our conception of nation-wide homogenous welfare state regimes. This paper examines the factors causing marked differences in local government spending in the provision of care for older people in Denmark. The conclusion is that the wealth of the municipality, local demographics and privatisation can explain about 48 per cent of the differences in local government spending. Political factors such as the ‘colour’ of local government have no explanatory power, while a high percentage of women in municipal councils appears to have a slightly negative effect on spending.

1 January 2004 in European Societies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RHRune Halvorsen
Rune Halvorsen
JHJensen Per H.
Jensen Per H.
The article discusses ‘activation’ in Denmark and Norway from an ‘active society’ perspective. The argument forwarded is that activation in the two Nordic countries shows continuity over the last 50 years, where Denmark and Norway have shared much of the same policy rationale or logic. At the same time there have been discrepancies in the activation opportunities, especially during the 1970s and 1980s. Such differences should be understood in terms of differences in the level and structure of unemployment in the two countries. All too often, changes in policy programmes and related ‘discourses’ have been evaluated without taking the changing labour-market conditions into account. On occasion this has led to too hasty or imbalanced conclusions. In part this has led to a misrepresentation of the relatively generous welfare benefit regime in Denmark during the 1980s, and in part to exaggeration of the alleged ‘repressive’ or unreasonable nature of the welfare-policy reforms in Denmark in the 1990s.

1 December 2009 in Journal of Aging Studies
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WOWim van Oorschot
Wim van Oorschot
JHJensen Per H.
Jensen Per H.

26 October 2005 in The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JHJensen Per H.
Jensen Per H.