This study group aimed to revise the 2017 international consensus guidelines for the management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) of the pancreas, and mainly focused on five topics; the revision of high-risk stigmata (HRS) and worrisome features (WF), surveillance of non-resected IPMN, surveillance after resection of IPMN, revision of pathological aspects, and investigation of molecular markers in cyst fluid. A new development from the prior guidelines is that systematic reviews were performed for each one of these topics, and published separately to provide evidence-based recommendations. One of the highlights of these new "evidence-based guidelines" is to propose a new management algorithm, and one major revision is to include into the assessment of HRS and WF the imaging findings from endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and the results of cytological analysis from EUS-guided fine needle aspiration technique, when this is performed. Another key element of the current guidelines is to clarify whether lifetime surveillance for small IPMNs is required, and recommends two options, "stop surveillance" or "continue surveillance for possible development of concomitant pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma", for small unchanged BD-IPMN after 5 years surveillance. Several other points are also discussed, including identifying high-risk features for recurrence in patients who underwent resection of non-invasive IPMN with negative surgical margin, summaries of the recent observations in the pathology of IPMN. In addition, the emerging role of cyst fluid markers that can aid in distinguishing IPMN from other pancreatic cysts and identify those IPMNs that harbor high-grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma is discussed.

Molecular and clinical markers outperform current clinical and imaging criteria for the diagnosis and management of patients with pancreatic cysts.

Purpose: Patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm grade-3 (PanNEN-G3) show variable responses to platinum-based chemotherapy. Recent studies indicated that PanNEN-G3 includes well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor with G3 (NET-G3). Here, we examined the clinicopathologic and molecular features of PanNEN-G3 and assessed the responsiveness to chemotherapy and survival. Experimental Design: A total of 100 patients with PanNEN-G3 were collected from 31 institutions, and after central review characteristics of each histologic subtype [NET-G3 vs. pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC-G3)] were analyzed, including clinical, radiological, and molecular features. Factors that correlate with response to chemotherapy and survival were assessed. Results: Seventy patients analyzed included 21 NETs-G3 (30%) and 49 NECs-G3 (70%). NET-G3 showed lower Ki67-labeling index (LI; median 28.5%), no abnormal Rb expression (0%), and no mutated KRAS (0%), whereas NEC-G3 showed higher Ki67-LI (median 80.0%), Rb loss (54.5%), and KRAS mutations (48.7%). Chemotherapy response rate (RR), platinum-based chemotherapy RR, and prognosis differed significantly between NET-G3 and NEC-G3. Chemotherapeutic outcomes were worse in NET-G3 (P < 0.001). When we stratified PanNEN-G3 with Rb and KRAS, PanNENs-G3 with Rb loss and those with mutated KRAS showed significantly higher RRs to platinum-based chemotherapy than those without (Rb loss, 80% vs. normal Rb, 24%, P = 0.006; mutated KRAS, 77% versus wild type, 23%, P = 0.023). Rb was a predictive marker of response to platinum-based chemotherapy even in NEC-G3 (P = 0.035). Conclusions: NET-G3 and NEC-G3 showed distinct clinicopathologic characteristics. Notably, NET-G3 does not respond to platinum-based chemotherapy. Rb and KRAS are promising predictors of response to platinum-based chemotherapy for PanNEN-G3, and Rb for NEC-G3. Clin Cancer Res; 23(16); 4625–32. ©2017 AACR.

The American Journal of Gastroenterology is published by Nature Publishing Group (NPG) on behalf of the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG). Ranked the #1 clinical journal covering gastroenterology and hepatology*, The American Journal of Gastroenterology (AJG) provides practical and professional support for clinicians dealing with the gastroenterological disorders seen most often in patients. Published with practicing clinicians in mind, the journal aims to be easily accessible, organizing its content by topic, both online and in print. www.amjgastro.com, *2007 Journal Citation Report (Thomson Reuters, 2008)

The present study was a retrospective investigation of predictors of malignancy in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) of the pancreas. The subjects were 310 patients who underwent pancreatic resection at 3 high-volume centers. Preoperative laboratory and imaging findings were analyzed in logistic regression analyses. Endoscopic ultrasonography measurements were essential for the size of mural nodules, and a central review was conducted for pathological diagnosis. Pathological diagnosis was benign IPMN in 150 cases and malignant in 160 (noninvasive carcinoma, n = 100; invasive, n = 60). In multivariate analysis, size of mural nodules, diameter of main pancreatic duct, and cyst size of branch pancreatic duct were independent predictors of malignancy, and areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for these 3 factors were 0.798, 0.643, and 0.601, respectively. With 7 mm taken as the cutoff value for the size of mural nodules, the diagnosis of malignant IPMN had sensitivity of 74.3% and specificity of 72.7%. Carcinoma without nodules was present in 15 patients (15/160 [9.4%]). The size of mural nodules measured with endoscopic ultrasonography showed high predictive ability. However, about 10% of carcinoma patients did not have nodules, and the handling of the diagnosis in such cases is a problem for the future.

Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is the standard procedure for treatment of colorectal tumors. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) can be performed for resection of larger tumors, but has not been studied in the colorectum because of technical difficulties and complications. We compared outcomes and complications after resection of colorectal tumors larger than 20 mm diameter by ESD and EMR. We retrospectively studied 104 colorectal tumors treated with EMR from 1995 to 2004, and 85 colorectal tumors treated with ESD from 2005 to 2009. We compared the tumor location, shape, size, procedure time, en bloc resection rate, recurrence rate, and associated complications between the treatments. Tumors treated with ESD were larger (31.6 ± 9.0 vs. 25.5 ± 6.8 mm, P<0.001), incurred a longer procedure time (87.2 ± 49.7 vs. 29.4 ± 26.1 min, P<0.001), had a higher en bloc resection rate [71 of 85 tumors (83.5%) vs. 50 of 104 tumors (48.1%), P<0.001], and had a lower recurrence rate [one of 84 tumors (1.2%) vs. 16 of 104 tumors (15.4%); P=0.002] compared with EMR. Perforation occurred in five (5.9%) cases after ESD and in none after EMR (P=0.04). Postoperative bleeding occurred in two (2.4%) and three (2.9%) cases after ESD and EMR (P=not significant), respectively. Although 11 of 16 cases with recurrence after EMR were cured by additional endoscopic treatment, three cases required surgery. The only recurrence after ESD was in one patient who developed perforation after snare EMR. Despite its longer procedure time and higher perforation rate, ESD resulted in a higher en bloc resection rate and lower recurrence rate for larger colorectal tumors compared with EMR.