The role of affect has been long studied in human–computer interactions. Unlike previous studies that focused on seven basic emotions, an avatar named Diana was introduced who expresses a higher level of emotional intelligence. To adapt to the users various affects during interaction, Diana simulates emotions with dynamic facial expressions. When two people collaborated to build blocks, their affects were recognized and labeled using the Affdex SDK and a descriptive analysis was provided. When participants turned to collaborate with Diana, their subjective responses were collected and the length of completion was recorded. Three modes of Diana were involved: a flat-faced Diana, a Diana that used mimicry facial expressions, and a Diana that used emotionally responsive facial expressions. Twenty-one responses were collected through a five-point Likert scale questionnaire and the NASA TLX. Results from questionnaires were not statistically different. However, the emotionally responsive Diana obtained more positive responses, and people spent the longest time with the mimicry Diana. In post-study comments, most participants perceived facial expressions on Diana’s face as natural, four mentioned uncomfortable feelings caused by the Uncanny Valley effect.

Virtual reality (VR) forest bathing for stress relief and mental health has recently become a popular research topic. As people spend more of their lives indoors and have less access to the restorative benefit of nature, having a VR nature supplement has the potential to improve quality of life. However, the optimal design of VR nature environments is an active area of investigation with many research questions to be explored. One major issue with VR is the difficulty of rendering high-fidelity assets in real time without causing cybersickness, or VR motion sickness, within the headset. Due to this limitation, we investigate if the realism of VR nature is critical for the restorative effects by comparing a low-realism nature environment to a high-realism nature environment. We only found a significant difference in the perceived restorativeness of the two environments, but after observing trends in our data toward the stress reduction potential of the high-realism environment, we suggest exploring more varieties of high and low-realism environments in future work to investigate the full potential of VR and how people respond.

Virtual reality (VR) could support the need for easily accessible therapeutic techniques, such as viewing art and immersing oneself in nature. Our study searches for the optimal virtual environment (VE) by exploring whether beauty in moving and still VEs contributes to stress reduction and perceived restorativeness. We hypothesized that the moving forest environment would result in the most stress reduction, while the abstract art would result in the least, with additional comparisons to a still forest environment and a control condition. The control condition took place outside the virtual headset to simulate what stress reduction would look like without a nature intervention. After working with 78 participants, we found an increase in statistical significance for stress reduction and perceived restorativeness in the moving forest condition compared to the control, as measured by the Zuckerman Inventory of Personal Reactions (ZIPERS) positive affect and the Perceived Restorativeness Scale (PRS). Additionally, the PRS and heart rate measures showed greater restorativeness in the moving forest condition than in the abstract art condition. Heart rate measures also showed statistical significance between the forest image condition and the control and moving forest conditions.