Raju Bapi

Prof. Raju Bapi

International Institute of Information Technology Hyderabad
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

37Years (1990-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 July 2010 in Biological Cybernetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
VCV Srinivasa Chakravarthy
V Srinivasa Chakravarthy
DJDenny Joseph
Denny Joseph
RBRaju Bapi
Raju Bapi

3 May 2000 in Experimental Brain Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RBRaju Bapi
Raju Bapi
KDKenji Doya
Kenji Doya
AHAlexander M. Harner
Alexander M. Harner

1 June 2014 in Applied Soft Computing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MFM.A.H. Farquad
M.A.H. Farquad
VRVadlamani Ravi
Vadlamani Ravi
RBRaju Bapi
Raju Bapi


1 November 2007 in Data & Knowledge Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PKPradeep Kumar
Pradeep Kumar
PKP. Radha Krishna
P. Radha Krishna
RBRaju Bapi
Raju Bapi
SDSupriya Kumar De
Supriya Kumar De

1 July 2014
Verified
Conference Paper
Closed access
MAMadhavi Alamuri
Madhavi Alamuri
RBRaju Bapi
Raju Bapi
ANAtul Negi
Atul Negi
Similarity or distance between two objects plays a fundamental role in many data mining tasks like classification and clustering. Categorical data, unlike numeric data, conceptually is deficient of default ordering relations on the attribute values. This makes the task of devising similarity or distance metrics and data mining tasks such as classification and clustering of categorical data more challenging. In this paper we formulate a taxonomy of various distance or similarity measures used in conjunction with data whose attributes are categorical. We categorize the existing measures into two broad classes, namely, Context-free and Context-sensitive measures for categorical data. In addition, we suggest a taxonomy of the clustering approaches for categorical data. We also propose a hybrid approach for measuring similarity between objects. We make a relative comparison of the strengths and weaknesses of some of the similarity measures and point out future research directions.