Chadi El Farran

Mr. Chadi El Farran


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2015 in Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BYBin Xia Yang
Bin Xia Yang
CFChadi El Farran
Chadi El Farran
HGHong Chao Guo
Hong Chao Guo
TYTao Yu
Tao Yu
HFHai Tong Fang
Hai Tong Fang
YLYuinhan Hain Loh
Yuinhan Hain Loh

26 February 2025 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TMTyler E. Miller
Tyler E. Miller
CFChadi El Farran
Chadi El Farran
CCCharles P. Couturier
Charles P. Couturier
ZCZeyu Chen
Zeyu Chen
JDJoshua P. D’antonio
Joshua P. D’antonio
BBBradley E. Bernstein
Bradley E. Bernstein
Gliomas are incurable malignancies notable for having an immunosuppressive microenvironment with abundant myeloid cells, the immunomodulatory phenotypes of which remain poorly defined1. Here we systematically investigate these phenotypes by integrating single-cell RNA sequencing, chromatin accessibility, spatial transcriptomics and glioma organoid explant systems. We discovered four immunomodulatory expression programs: microglial inflammatory and scavenger immunosuppressive programs, which are both unique to primary brain tumours, and systemic inflammatory and complement immunosuppressive programs, which are also expressed by non-brain tumours. The programs are not contingent on myeloid cell type, developmental origin or tumour mutational state, but instead are driven by microenvironmental cues, including tumour hypoxia, interleukin-1β, TGFβ and standard-of-care dexamethasone treatment. Their relative expression can predict immunotherapy response and overall survival. By associating the respective programs with mediating genomic elements, transcription factors and signalling pathways, we uncover strategies for manipulating myeloid-cell phenotypes. Our study provides a framework to understand immunomodulation by myeloid cells in glioma and a foundation for the development of more-effective immunotherapies.

24 February 2022 in Nature Biotechnology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TMTyler E. Miller
Tyler E. Miller
CLCaleb A. Lareau
Caleb A. Lareau
JVJulia A. Verga
Julia A. Verga
EDErica A. K. DePasquale
Erica A. K. DePasquale
VLVincent Liu
Vincent Liu
PGPeter van Galen
Peter van Galen

18 April 2018 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HFHai-Tong Fang
Hai-Tong Fang
CFChadi El Farran
Chadi El Farran
QXQiao Rui Xing
Qiao Rui Xing
LZLi-Feng Zhang
Li-Feng Zhang
LHLi Hu
Li Hu
YLYuinhan Hain Loh
Yuinhan Hain Loh
H3.3 is a histone variant, which is deposited on genebodies and regulatory elements, by Hira, marking active transcription. Moreover, H3.3 is deposited on heterochromatin by Atrx/Daxx complex. The exact role of H3.3 in cell fate transition remains elusive. Here, we investigate the dynamic changes in the deposition of the histone variant H3.3 during cellular reprogramming. H3.3 maintains the identities of the parental cells during reprogramming as its removal at early time-point enhances the efficiency of the process. We find that H3.3 plays a similar role in transdifferentiation to hematopoietic progenitors and neuronal differentiation from embryonic stem cells. Contrastingly, H3.3 deposition on genes associated with the newly reprogrammed lineage is essential as its depletion at the later phase abolishes the process. Mechanistically, H3.3 deposition by Hira, and its K4 and K36 modifications are central to the role of H3.3 in cell fate conversion. Finally, H3.3 safeguards fibroblast lineage by regulating Mapk cascade and collagen synthesis.

1 June 2016 in Cell Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CTCheng-Xu Delon Toh
Cheng-Xu Delon Toh
JCJun-Wei Chan
Jun-Wei Chan
ZCZheng-Shan Chong
Zheng-Shan Chong
HWHao Fei Wang
Hao Fei Wang
HGHong Chao Guo
Hong Chao Guo
YLYuinhan Hain Loh
Yuinhan Hain Loh
Incomplete knowledge of the mechanisms at work continues to hamper efforts to maximize reprogramming efficiency. Here, we present a systematic genome-wide RNAi screen to determine the global regulators during the early stages of human reprogramming. Our screen identifies functional repressors and effectors that act to impede or promote the reprogramming process. Repressors and effectors form close interacting networks in pathways, including RNA processing, G protein signaling, protein ubiquitination, and chromatin modification. Combinatorial knockdown of five repressors (SMAD3, ZMYM2, SFRS11, SAE1, and ESET) synergistically resulted in ∼85% TRA-1-60-positive cells. Removal of the novel splicing factor SFRS11 during reprogramming is accompanied by rapid acquisition of pluripotency-specific spliced forms. Mechanistically, SFRS11 regulates exon skipping and mutually exclusive splicing of transcripts in genes involved in cell differentiation, mRNA splicing, and chromatin modification. Our study provides insights into the reprogramming process, which comprises comprehensive and multi-layered transcriptional, splicing, and epigenetic machineries.

21 November 2024 in Nature Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JWJingyi Wu
Jingyi Wu
LCLuis Nicolas Gonzalez Castro
Luis Nicolas Gonzalez Castro
SBSofia Battaglia
Sofia Battaglia
CFChadi El Farran
Chadi El Farran
JDJoshua P. D’antonio
Joshua P. D’antonio
BBBradley E. Bernstein
Bradley E. Bernstein