In the past, laboratory tests were considered of limited value in Crohn's disease (CD). In the era of biologics, laboratory tests have become essential to evaluate the inflammatory burden of the disease (C-reactive protein, fecal calprotectin) since symptoms-based scores are subjective, to predict the response to pharmacological options and the risk of relapse, to discriminate CD from ulcerative colitis, to select candidates to anti-tumor necrosis factors [screening tests looking for hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus status and latent tuberculosis], to assess the risk of adverse events (testing for thiopurine metabolites and thiopurine-methyltransferase activity), and to personalize and optimize therapy (therapeutic drug monitoring). Pharmacogenetics, though presently confined to the assessment of thiopurineme methyltransferase polymorphisms and hematological toxicity associated with thiopurine treatment, is a promising field that will contribute to a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms of the variability in response to the drugs used in CD with the attempt to expand personalized care and precision medicine strategies.

Background: Diet has a relevant role in triggering symptoms in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) from the patients’ perspective, but there is gap the between patients’ and doctors’ perceptions. Few studies have addressed this topic. The aim of this study was to evaluate food habits and nutrition knowledge in a homogeneous cohort of patients with IBD from southern Italy. Methods: 167 consecutive patients with IBD were recruited. The survey was based on the administration of a semi-structured questionnaire assessing demographics, disease features, dietary behavior, and food intolerance. Results: The majority of patients did not consider food a cause of their disease. However more than 80% changed their diet after the diagnosis and most report an improvement in symptoms. Spiced and seasoned foods, dairy products, vegetables, and fruit were often avoided. A dairy-free diet was adopted by 33.7%. Food choices were based on self-experience and not on medical counselling. Dietary modifications deeply impact on lifestyle. Conclusions: Most of the patients with IBD set diet and lifestyle on self-experience and give up many foods. This has an impact on psychosocial functioning and can lead to nutritional deficiencies. High quality studies are warranted to assess evidence-based dietary strategies and develop patient-targeted dietary recommendations.

Introduction: The prevalences of malnutrition and sarcopenia in patients with IBD are not precisely known, and nutritional assessment is not standardized. We assessed the prevalence and risk factors of these conditions in outpatients and their impact on clinical outcomes. Methods: This prospective longitudinal study considered patients who had IBD for at least one year, were attending a tertiary IBD center, and were followed for the subsequent year. Results: In a sample of 158 consecutive patients (96 with Crohn’s disease and 62 with ulcerative colitis), the prevalence of malnutrition, according to GLIM criteria, was 13.3%. For identifying patients at risk of malnutrition, the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool demonstrated better accuracy, (sensitivity 88.9 (65.3–98.6) and specificity 90.2 (83.8–93.4)) than the SaskIBD-NR questionnaire (sensitivity 69.3 (41.1–86.7) and specificity 60.9 (60.9–76.8)). The prevalence of sarcopenia was 34.2%. Considering clinical outcomes, sarcopenia at baseline was significantly associated with hospital admission within a year (p = 45.2% vs. 20.3%, 0.026). Conclusions: Malnutrition and sarcopenia were present in about one-third of IBD patients. Awareness should be raised among physicians caring for IBD patients about the need to evaluate patients’ nutritional statuses to help patients achieve a better quality of life.

Gastrointestinal manifestations are common across all hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTRv) genotypes. However, they are poorly specific, and their recognition as part of ATTRv is difficult, resulting in misdiagnosis with more common conditions. Moreover, delays in diagnosis occur because of fragmented knowledge, a shortage of centers of excellence and specialists dedicated to ATTRv management, and the scarce involvement of gastroenterologists in multidisciplinary teams. A group of Italian gastroenterologists with experience in the management of ATTRv took part in a project aimed at assessing the awareness of ATTRv among the community of Italian gastroenterologists through an online survey and providing education about practical aspects of ATTRv management. Survey results reported low participation, and very few patients with ATTRv were cared for by gastroenterologists. This highlights the need for greater attention to rare diseases in gastroenterology and emphasizes increasing awareness of ATTRv and diagnostic suspicion. Based on the experts' recommendations, a diagnosis of ATTRv should be suspected when at least one of the 'red flags' is detected. Subsequently, it is suggested to promptly ask for genetic testing and exclude a serum and urinary monoclonal protein, even before the detection of amyloid in biopsy samples, particularly in non-endemic areas.