The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is an ongoing global health crisis with unmatched outcomes and effects. This pandemic has caused an infodemic of article publication in scientific journals. Dental journals have been active in the publication of COVID-19 related articles from the beginning of the pandemic. In this cross-sectional survey, we present an analysis of the scientific output of dental journals on COVID-19. The PubMed COVID-19 database was searched with the “Dental Journals” filter. Data including journal name, country, month of publication and number of citations were recorded. Science mapping analysis of the most used keywords was also performed. The search retrieved a total of 659 articles, of which 28 were excluded. Oral Diseases has published the most COVID-19 articles (15.1%), followed by the British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (8.6%) and the Journal of Dental Education (7.9%). Most of the articles were from researchers from the United States (168), United Kingdom (120) and Brazil (83). The number of citations of the published articles ranged from 0 to 406, with most articles (64.2%) having no citations. Science Mapping analysis revealed that the most used keywords were coronavirus infections, pandemics and humans. The dental community has been active in the publication of COVID-19 articles from the beginning of the pandemic. The papers published by dental journals explore issues such as the management of clinical practices during the outbreak, infection control in the dental setting, signs and symptoms of COVID-19 affecting the oral cavity, and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on educational and clinical programs.

Background. The ability to control pain is an essential part of dental procedures and the need for optimal pain control and reduction of discomfort is the primary concern of every dentist. This study aims to compare the pain and vital signs during inferior alveolar nerve block between conventional and a new modification of the two-step injection techniques. Methods. In this institutional single-blind randomized clinical trial, attendees of dental school at Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences from February to May 2022 were included. Inclusion criteria were 2060 years old and healthy (ASA1) individuals who were willing to participate in this study. Individuals who were taking medications affecting their understanding of pain and patients with active infections at the injection site were excluded. These individuals were divided into two groups. First, superficial anesthesia was performed and afterward, conventional and two-step injection techniques were performed. For the two-step injection method, 6mm of the needle was injected into the mucosa and one-third of the local anesthetic solution was released from the computer-controlled injection toolkit. Afterward, a 25mm 30-gauge needle was reinserted into the previous hole delivering the remaining local anesthetic. The pain during injection was measured by a patient-reported numerical rating scale (NRS). Moreover, vital signs were monitored immediately before and after the injection. KolmogorovSmirnov test, MannWhitney U test, independent T-test, and Fishers exact χ² test were performed for statistical analysis (α0.05). Results. This study involved 32 adults aged between 20 and 50 years old with 1:1 female/male sex distribution. The pain score was significantly higher in the conventional injection technique compared to the two-step injection technique in all sex and age groups. There were no significant differences in vital signs between the conventional and two-step injection techniques. There was no significant difference in the mean pain scores of females and males, regardless of their injection techniques. Conclusion. Utilizing the two-step injection technique in patients for inferior alveolar block reduces pain during injection without altering patients vital signs significantly. This trial is registered with IRCT20220106053646N1.

(1) Background: Fractal analysis has been used as a mathematical method for studying the complexity of fractal structures such as trabecular bone that look similar at different scales. Bruxism is a disorder involving nonfunctional grinding and clenching of the teeth that leads to bone resorption and fractal dimension reduction. This study aimed to evaluate the trabecular pattern of the mandibular condyle, angle, and dental region in panoramic radiographs of individuals with and without bruxism using fractal analysis and a larger sample size. (2) Methods: A total of 365 panoramic radiographs belonging to two groups consisting of bruxism and non-bruxism individuals were assessed using fractal analysis. Fractal dimension (FD) values were calculated on each side for the three regions of interest (ROIs): the mandibular condylar head, mandibular angle, and interdental region between the second premolar and first molar. Statistical analysis was performed using binominal and chi-square tests, the Shapiro–Wilk test, and the Mann–Whitney test (α = 0.05). (3) Results: No significant differences were observed between the FD values of the ROIs in the two groups (p > 0.05). (4) Conclusions: No significant differences existed in the FD values of the ROIs in patients with and without bruxism. This result shows that fractal analysis of panoramic radiographs cannot be useful in detecting patients with bruxism.