Lysosomes are cellular organelles primarily involved in degradation and recycling processes. During lysosomal exocytosis, a Ca²⁺-regulated process, lysosomes are docked to the cell surface and fuse with the plasma membrane (PM), emptying their content outside the cell. This process has an important role in secretion and PM repair. Here we show that the transcription factor EB (TFEB) regulates lysosomal exocytosis. TFEB increases the pool of lysosomes in the proximity of the PM and promotes their fusion with PM by raising intracellular Ca²⁺ levels through the activation of the lysosomal Ca²⁺ channel MCOLN1. Induction of lysosomal exocytosis by TFEB overexpression rescued pathologic storage and restored normal cellular morphology both in vitro and in vivo in lysosomal storage diseases (LSDs). Our data indicate that lysosomal exocytosis may directly modulate cellular clearance and suggest an alternative therapeutic strategy for disorders associated with intracellular storage.

Several experimental and clinical studies have shown that oxidized low-density lipoprotein and oxidation-sensitive mechanisms are central in the pathogenesis of vascular dysfunction and atherogenesis. Here, we have used p66 ^Shc−/− and WT mice to investigate the effects of high-fat diet on both systemic and tissue oxidative stress and the development of early vascular lesions. To date, the p66 ^Shc−/− mouse is the unique genetic model of increased resistance to oxidative stress and prolonged life span in mammals. Computer-assisted image analysis revealed that chronic 21% high-fat treatment increased the aortic cumulative early lesion area by ≈21% in WT mice and only by 3% in p66 ^Shc−/− mice. Early lesions from p66 ^Shc−/− mice had less content of macrophage-derived foam cells and apoptotic vascular cells, in comparison to the WT. Furthermore, in p66 ^Shc−/− mice, but not WT mice, we found a significant reduction of systemic and tissue oxidative stress (assessed by isoprostanes, plasma low-density lipoprotein oxidizability, and the formation of arterial oxidation-specific epitopes). These results support the concept that p66 ^Shc−/− may play a pivotal role in controlling systemic oxidative stress and vascular diseases. Therefore, p66 ^Shc might represent a molecular target for therapies against vascular diseases.

The transcription factor EB (TFEB) is an essential component of lysosomal biogenesis and autophagy for the adaptive response to food deprivation. To address the physiological function of TFEB in skeletal muscle, we have used muscle-specific gain- and loss-of-function approaches. Here, we show that TFEB controls metabolic flexibility in muscle during exercise and that this action is independent of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ coactivator1α (PGC1α). Indeed, TFEB translocates into the myonuclei during physical activity and regulates glucose uptake and glycogen content by controlling expression of glucose transporters, glycolytic enzymes, and pathways related to glucose homeostasis. In addition, TFEB induces the expression of genes involved in mitochondrial biogenesis, fatty acid oxidation, and oxidative phosphorylation. This coordinated action optimizes mitochondrial substrate utilization, thus enhancing ATP production and exercise capacity. These findings identify TFEB as a critical mediator of the beneficial effects of exercise on metabolism.

Typing somatostatin receptor expression in neuroendocrine tumors is of relevance to target somatostatin analogue-based diagnostic approach and treatment. The expanding use of immunohistochemistry to detect somatostatin receptors is to date not paralleled by an accurate methodological setting and standardized interpretation of the results. A multicentric study was designed to compare somatostatin receptor immunohistochemical expression with in vivo scintigraphic data and verify its usefulness in the clinical management of neuroendocrine tumors. After methodological setting by testing different somatostatin receptor antibodies, 107 cases of neuroendocrine tumors with available somatostatin receptor scintigraphy data and pathological material were retrospectively analyzed for somatostatin receptor types 2A, 3 and 5 immunohistochemical expression, and compared with scintigraphic images and, whenever available, with the clinical response to somatostatin analogue treatment. Restricting ‘positive cases’ to the presence of a membrane pattern of staining, an overall somatostatin receptor type 2A immunohistochemistry/somatostatin receptor scintigraphy agreement of 77% (χ² test P<0.0001) was reached. Lower concordance ratios were detected in preoperative and metastatic tumor samples, possibly as a consequence of somatostatin receptor expression heterogeneity. Pure somatostatin receptor type 2A cytoplasmic staining showed poor correlation with somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (54% concordance rate). The immunohistochemical detection of somatostatin receptor types 3 and 5, which showed almost exclusively a cytoplasmic pattern, did not improve the concordance with scintigraphic data. In a pilot series, somatostatin receptor type 2A immunohistochemistry correlated with clinical response in 75% of cases. In conclusion, we propose a scoring system for somatostatin receptor type 2A immunohistochemistry in neuroendocrine tumors correlated with in vivo data, based on the evidence that only membrane (rather that cytoplasmic) staining should be considered for a reliable, standardized and clinically relevant report.