Feng Hao

Dr. Feng Hao


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2020 in Social Science & Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WSWanyun Shao
Wanyun Shao
FHFeng Hao
Feng Hao

1 March 2021 in Health & Place
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FHFeng Hao
Feng Hao
WSWanyun Shao
Wanyun Shao
WHWeiwei Huang
Weiwei Huang

24 January 2022 in Journal of Religion and Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JMJay Michaels
Jay Michaels
FHFeng Hao
Feng Hao
NRNicole Ritenour
Nicole Ritenour
NANaomi Aguilar
Naomi Aguilar
This study aimed to test whether pre-pandemic religious service attendance relates to both lesser impact from the COVID-19 pandemic and lower levels of psychological distress among a sample of 645 American adults across nine US regions. A second aim was to test whether belongingness mediated these relationships. First, it was expected that more frequent pre-pandemic religious service attendance relates to belongingness, which mediates the religious service attendance and psychological distress association. Second, it was expected that people who felt greater belongingness also experienced less perceived impact from the pandemic. Results from a path model supported these hypotheses. This is among the first studies to provide empirical evidence for religion’s association with psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic.


14 October 2024 in Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Ran TaoRan Tao
Ran Tao
XYXiankui Yang
Xiankui Yang
FHFeng Hao
Feng Hao
PCPeng Chen
Peng Chen

1 July 2021 in International Journal of Public Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
WSWanyun Shao
Wanyun Shao
FHFeng Hao
Feng Hao
Objectives:COVID-19 is the most challenging public health crisis in decades in the United States. It is imperative to enforce social distancing rules before any safe and effective vaccines are widely available. Policies without public support are destined to fail. This study aims to reveal factors that determine the American public support for six mitigation measures (e.g., cancel gatherings, close schools, restrict non-essential travel).Methods:Based on a nationally representative survey, this study uses Structural Equation Modelling to reveal the relationships between various factors and public support for COVID-19 mitigation.Results:1). Democrats are more likely than Republicans to support mitigation measures; 2).Favorability towards the political leader (Biden or Trump) can slant public support for COVID-19 mitigation measures among different segments of the public.; 3). Indirect experience, rather than direct experience with COVID-19 can motivate people to support mitigation; 4). Concern for COVID-19 is a strong motivator of support for mitigation.Conclusion:Political polarization poses an enormous challenge to societal well-being during a pandemic. Indirect experience renders COVID-19 an imminent threat.