Simone Rossi

Dr. Simone Rossi

Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Piacenza, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2021 in Global Finance Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
APAndrea Paltrinieri
Andrea Paltrinieri
Alberto DreassiAlberto Dreassi
Alberto Dreassi
SRSimone Rossi
Simone Rossi
AKAshraf Khan
Ashraf Khan

9 February 2021 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MSMaria Gaia Soana
Maria Gaia Soana
LBLaura Barbieri
Laura Barbieri
ALAndrea Lippi
Andrea Lippi
SRSimone Rossi
Simone Rossi
The wide-ranging academic literature on corporate governance in the banking sector includes only a few studies on bank ownership and, specifically, on the comparative power of shareholders within the corporate structure. This paper reports an investigation into the presence of multiple large shareholders and their influence on profitability and risk in the long-term, considering a sample of 697 U.S. and European listed commercial banks from 2008 to 2018. It was found that the number of large and institutional shareholders has a positive impact on profitability, but no effect on risk. However, long-term ownership by multiple large shareholders contributes to decreasing risk in banks.

8 June 2019 in International Journal of Business and Management
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SRSimone Rossi
Simone Rossi
MBMariarosa Borroni
Mariarosa Borroni
MPMariacristina Piva
Mariacristina Piva
ALAndrea Lippi
Andrea Lippi
During healthy economic/financial times, credit growth often happens without proper provisioning. This is due to a managerial myopia that underestimates the risks underlying an expansive lending policy, leading to lower profitability in following years. However, given the countercyclicality of credit standards, this effect shouldn’t occur during harsh times. In this paper, we analyse the relationship between abnormal credit growth and bank profitability during a crisis period. In particular, we test the hypothesis that during a crisis, abnormal credit growth improves bank profitability, given the need for higher, or at least stable, credit standards. We find support for this assumption using a sample of 101 large European banks observed during the recent crisis period. Results are robust to different robustness checks.

10 December 2020 in Journal of Financial Management, Markets and Institutions
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SRSimone Rossi
Simone Rossi
Alberto DreassiAlberto Dreassi
Alberto Dreassi
MBMariarosa Borroni
Mariarosa Borroni
APAndrea Paltrinieri
Andrea Paltrinieri
Banks have been revising their business models since the financial crisis, diversifying income sources to pursue profitability and stability in a rapidly evolving environment. The effectiveness of this strategy is still debated. We investigate if revenue diversification of 1250 EU and US banks improved performance or its stability between 2008 and 2016. We adopt a broad econometric approach and define diversification as the share of non-interest revenue and the HH index of the net operating income. We find that diversification is not clearly associated with performance or its volatility, that benefits change remarkably over time and, where present, show significant variability. Our results support recent evidence on the limitations of diversification in banking, raising potential concerns on converging supervisory practices and general calls for revenue diversity. The variability of business models and the impacts of different economic and institutional environments matter.

3 June 2022 in EuroMed Journal of Business
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MSMaria Gaia Soana
Maria Gaia Soana
ALAndrea Lippi
Andrea Lippi
SRSimone Rossi
Simone Rossi
Purpose: This paper investigates the stock market reaction to three different events related to the UEFA Champions League – the announcements of draws, odds and match results. The aim of the paper is to test whether these events are informative for stock market operators, i.e. whether they produce abnormal returns.Design/methodology/approach: Applying the event study methodology, the authors investigate the stock market reaction before (at two events: the draw date and on the release of betting odds) and after the matches of 11 listed soccer teams in the period 2003–2019. The authors also conduct OLS regression analyses in order to disentangle the impact of firm specific variables and match characteristics on cumulative abnormal returns.Findings: This paper finds that match outcomes affect the stock market performance of listed teams, while the announcements of draws and odds do not. More specifically, the market does not consider match outcomes involving wins and ties as informative events, while it penalizes losing teams. Moreover, investor reactions to events related to the UCL competition depend more on match characteristics than on company specific variables.Originality/value: The study enriches the ongoing debate about the impact of soccer team results on stock market performance in several ways: using the widest time span ever adopted in this area; focusing on UCL, which is the most important soccer competition played by private clubs; disentangling for the first time the effects of draws, odds release and sporting outcome on stock returns of listed soccer clubs.