Anton S. Petrov

Dr. Anton S. Petrov

School of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
30 November 2015 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
APAnton S. Petrov
Anton S. Petrov
BGBurak Gulen
Burak Gulen
ANAshlyn M. Norris
Ashlyn M. Norris
NKNicholas A. Kovacs
Nicholas A. Kovacs
CBChad R. Bernier
Chad R. Bernier
LWLoren Williams
Loren Williams
Significance: The ribosome, in analogy with a tree, contains a record of its history, spanning 4 billion years of life on earth. The information contained within ribosomes connects us to the prehistory of biology. Details of ribosomal RNA variation, observed by comparing three-dimensional structures of ribosomes across the tree of life, form the basis of our molecular-level model of the origins and evolution of the translational system. We infer many steps in the evolution of translation, mapping out acquisition of structure and function, revealing much about how modern biology originated from ancestral chemical systems.

30 June 2014 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
APAnton S. Petrov
Anton S. Petrov
CBChad R. Bernier
Chad R. Bernier
CHChiaolong Hsiao
Chiaolong Hsiao
ANAshlyn M. Norris
Ashlyn M. Norris
NKNicholas A. Kovacs
Nicholas A. Kovacs
LWLoren Williams
Loren Williams
Significance: Ribosomes exist in every cell and are responsible for translation from mRNA to protein. The structure of the ribosomal common core is highly conserved in all living species, while the outer regions of the ribosome are variable. Ribosomal RNA of eukaryotes contains expansion segments accreted onto the surface of the core, which is nearly identical in structure to that in prokaryotic ribosomes. Comparing eukaryotic and prokaryotic ribosomes allows us to identify 3D insertion fingerprints of the expansion segments. Similar fingerprints allow us to analyze the common core and detect ancestral expansion segments within it. We construct a molecular model of ribosomal evolution starting from primordial biological systems near the dawn of life, culminating with relatively recent changes specific to metazoans.

9 June 2021 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BSBlake A. Sweeney
Blake A. Sweeney
DHDavid Hoksza
David Hoksza
ENEric P. Nawrocki
Eric P. Nawrocki
CRCarlos Eduardo Ribas
Carlos Eduardo Ribas
FMFábio Madeira
Fábio Madeira
APAnton I. Petrov
Anton I. Petrov
Non-coding RNAs (ncRNA) are essential for all life, and their functions often depend on their secondary (2D) and tertiary structure. Despite the abundance of software for the visualisation of ncRNAs, few automatically generate consistent and recognisable 2D layouts, which makes it challenging for users to construct, compare and analyse structures. Here, we present R2DT, a method for predicting and visualising a wide range of RNA structures in standardised layouts. R2DT is based on a library of 3,647 templates representing the majority of known structured RNAs. R2DT has been applied to ncRNA sequences from the RNAcentral database and produced >13 million diagrams, creating the world’s largest RNA 2D structure dataset. The software is amenable to community expansion, and is freely available at https://github.com/rnacentral/R2DT and a web server is found at https://rnacentral.org/r2dt.

5 February 2014 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
APAnton S. Petrov
Anton S. Petrov
CBChad R. Bernier
Chad R. Bernier
BGBurak Gulen
Burak Gulen
CWChris C. Waterbury
Chris C. Waterbury
EHEli Hershkovits
Eli Hershkovits
LWLoren Dean Williams
Loren Dean Williams
Accurate secondary structures are important for understanding ribosomes, which are extremely large and highly complex. Using 3D structures of ribosomes as input, we have revised and corrected traditional secondary (2°) structures of rRNAs. We identify helices by specific geometric and molecular interaction criteria, not by co-variation. The structural approach allows us to incorporate non-canonical base pairs on parity with Watson-Crick base pairs. The resulting rRNA 2° structures are up-to-date and consistent with three-dimensional structures, and are information-rich. These 2° structures are relatively simple to understand and are amenable to reproduction and modification by end-users. The 2° structures made available here broadly sample the phylogenetic tree and are mapped with a variety of data related to molecular interactions and geometry, phylogeny and evolution. We have generated 2° structures for both large subunit (LSU) 23S/28S and small subunit (SSU) 16S/18S rRNAs of Escherichia coli, Thermus thermophilus, Haloarcula marismortui (LSU rRNA only), Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Drosophila melanogaster, and Homo sapiens. We provide high-resolution editable versions of the 2° structures in several file formats. For the SSU rRNA, the 2° structures use an intuitive representation of the central pseudoknot where base triples are presented as pairs of base pairs. Both LSU and SSU secondary maps are available (http://apollo.chemistry.gatech.edu/RibosomeGallery). Mapping of data onto 2° structures was performed on the RiboVision server (http://apollo.chemistry.gatech.edu/RiboVision).

14 June 2013 in Nucleic Acids Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
APAnton S. Petrov
Anton S. Petrov
CBChad R. Bernier
Chad R. Bernier
EHEli Hershkovits
Eli Hershkovits
YXYuzhen Xue
Yuzhen Xue
CWChris C. Waterbury
Chris C. Waterbury
LWLoren Williams
Loren Williams
We present a de novo re-determination of the secondary (2°) structure and domain architecture of the 23S and 5S rRNAs, using 3D structures, determined by X-ray diffraction, as input. In the traditional 2° structure, the center of the 23S rRNA is an extended single strand, which in 3D is seen to be compact and double helical. Accurately assigning nucleotides to helices compels a revision of the 23S rRNA 2° structure. Unlike the traditional 2° structure, the revised 2° structure of the 23S rRNA shows architectural similarity with the 16S rRNA. The revised 2° structure also reveals a clear relationship with the 3D structure and is generalizable to rRNAs of other species from all three domains of life. The 2° structure revision required us to reconsider the domain architecture. We partitioned the 23S rRNA into domains through analysis of molecular interactions, calculations of 2D folding propensities and compactness. The best domain model for the 23S rRNA contains seven domains, not six as previously ascribed. Domain 0 forms the core of the 23S rRNA, to which the other six domains are rooted. Editable 2° structures mapped with various data are provided ( http://apollo.chemistry.gatech.edu/RibosomeGallery ).

4 December 2018 in Molecular Biology and Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
APAnton S. Petrov
Anton S. Petrov
EWElizabeth C Wood
Elizabeth C Wood
CBChad R Bernier
Chad R Bernier
ANAshlyn M Norris
Ashlyn M Norris
ABAlan Brown
Alan Brown
AAAlexey Amunts
Alexey Amunts
Mitochondrial ribosomes (mitoribosomes) are essential components of all mitochondria that synthesize proteins encoded by the mitochondrial genome. Unlike other ribosomes, mitoribosomes are highly variable across species. The basis for this diversity is not known. Here, we examine the composition and evolutionary history of mitoribosomes across the phylogenetic tree by combining three-dimensional structural information with a comparative analysis of the secondary structures of mitochondrial rRNAs (mt-rRNAs) and available proteomic data. We generate a map of the acquisition of structural variation and reconstruct the fundamental stages that shaped the evolution of the mitoribosomal large subunit and led to this diversity. Our analysis suggests a critical role for ablation and expansion of rapidly evolving mt-rRNA. These changes cause structural instabilities that are “patched” by the acquisition of pre-existing compensatory elements, thus providing opportunities for rapid evolution. This mechanism underlies the incorporation of mt-tRNA into the central protuberance of the mammalian mitoribosome, and the altered path of the polypeptide exit tunnel of the yeast mitoribosome. We propose that since the toolkits of elements utilized for structural patching differ between mitochondria of different species, it fosters the growing divergence of mitoribosomes.