Maxim Shmarov

Dr. Maxim Shmarov

Gamaleya National Research Centre of Epidemiology and Microbiology
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 September 2020 in The Lancet
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DLDenis Logunov
Denis Logunov
ISInna Shuliakova
Inna Shuliakova
OZOlga V Zubkova
Olga V Zubkova
ATAmir I Tukhvatullin
Amir I Tukhvatullin
DSDmitry V Shcheblyakov
Dmitry V Shcheblyakov
AGAlexander L Gintsburg
Alexander L Gintsburg
We developed a heterologous COVID-19 vaccine consisting of two components, a recombinant adenovirus type 26 (rAd26) vector and a recombinant adenovirus type 5 (rAd5) vector, both carrying the gene for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike glycoprotein (rAd26-S and rAd5-S). We aimed to assess the safety and immunogenicity of two formulations (frozen and lyophilised) of this vaccine. Methods We did two open, non-randomised phase 1/2 studies at two hospitals in Russia. We enrolled healthy adult volunteers (men and women) aged 18–60 years to both studies. In phase 1 of each study, we administered intramuscularly on day 0 either one dose of rAd26-S or one dose of rAd5-S and assessed the safety of the two components for 28 days. In phase 2 of the study, which began no earlier than 5 days after phase 1 vaccination, we administered intramuscularly a prime-boost vaccination, with rAd26-S given on day 0 and rAd5-S on day 21. Primary outcome measures were antigen-specific humoral immunity (SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies measured by ELISA on days 0, 14, 21, 28, and 42) and safety (number of participants with adverse events monitored throughout the study). Secondary outcome measures were antigen-specific cellular immunity (T-cell responses and interferon-γ concentration) and change in neutralising antibodies (detected with a SARS-CoV-2 neutralisation assay). These trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04436471 and NCT04437875. Findings Between June 18 and Aug 3, 2020, we enrolled 76 participants to the two studies (38 in each study). In each study, nine volunteers received rAd26-S in phase 1, nine received rAd5-S in phase 1, and 20 received rAd26-S and rAd5-S in phase 2. Both vaccine formulations were safe and well tolerated. The most common adverse events were pain at injection site (44 [58%]), hyperthermia (38 [50%]), headache (32 [42%]), asthenia (21 [28%]), and muscle and joint pain (18 [24%]). Most adverse events were mild and no serious adverse events were detected. All participants produced antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 glycoprotein. At day 42, receptor binding domain-specific IgG titres were 14 703 with the frozen formulation and 11 143 with the lyophilised formulation, and neutralising antibodies were 49·25 with the frozen formulation and 45·95 with the lyophilised formulation, with a seroconversion rate of 100%. Cell-mediated responses were detected in all participants at day 28, with median cell proliferation of 2·5% CD4+ and 1·3% CD8+ with the frozen formulation, and a median cell proliferation of 1·3% CD4+ and 1·1% CD8+ with the lyophilised formulation. Interpretation The heterologous rAd26 and rAd5 vector-based COVID-19 vaccine has a good safety profile and induced strong humoral and cellular immune responses in participants. Further investigation is needed of the effectiveness of this vaccine for prevention of COVID-19. Funding Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation.

4 April 2011 in Oncotarget
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YBYulia A. Barykova
Yulia A. Barykova
DLDenis Yu. Logunov
Denis Yu. Logunov
MSMaxim Shmarov
Maxim Shmarov
AVAndrei Z. Vinarov
Andrei Z. Vinarov
DFDmitry N. Fiev
Dmitry N. Fiev
MGMarina Antoch and Andrei Gudkov
Marina Antoch and Andrei Gudkov
Association of Mycoplasma hominis infection with prostate cancer

2 February 2017 in Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ISInna Shuliakova
Inna Shuliakova
OZO. V. Zubkova
O. V. Zubkova
Amir I. TukhvatulinAmir I. Tukhvatulin
Amir I. Tukhvatulin
ADA. S. Dzharullaeva
A. S. Dzharullaeva
NTN. M. Tukhvatulina
N. M. Tukhvatulina
AGA. L. Gintsburg
A. L. Gintsburg
Ebola hemorrhagic fever, also known as Ebola virus disease or EVD, is one of the most dangerous viral diseases in humans and animals. In this open-label, dose-escalation clinical trial, we assessed the safety, side effects, and immunogenicity of a novel, heterologous prime-boost vaccine against Ebola, which was administered in 2 doses to 84 healthy adults of both sexes between 18 and 55 years. The vaccine consists of live-attenuated recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) and adenovirus serotype-5 (Ad5) expressing Ebola envelope glycoprotein. The most common adverse event was pain at the injection site, although no serious adverse events were reported. The vaccine did not significantly impact blood, urine, and immune indices. Seroconversion rate was 100 %. Antigen-specific IgG geometric mean titer at day 42 was 3,277 (95 % confidence interval 2,401–4,473) in volunteers immunized at full dose. Neutralizing antibodies were detected in 93.1 % of volunteers immunized at full dose, with geometric mean titer 20. Antigen-specific response in peripheral blood mononuclear cells was also detected in 100 % of participants, as well as in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in 82.8 % and 58.6 % of participants vaccinated at full dose, respectively. The data indicate that the vaccine is safe and induces strong humoral and cellular immune response in up to 100 % of healthy adult volunteers, and provide a rationale for testing efficacy in Phase III trials. Indeed, the strong immune response to the vaccine may elicit long-term protection. This trial was registered with grls.rosminzdrav.ru (No. 495*), and with zakupki.gov.ru (No. 0373100043215000055).

14 April 2008 in Oncogene
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DLD Y Logunov
D Y Logunov
DSD V Scheblyakov
D V Scheblyakov
OZO V Zubkova
O V Zubkova
MSMaxim Shmarov
Maxim Shmarov
IRI V Rakovskaya
I V Rakovskaya
MGMarina Antoch and Andrei Gudkov
Marina Antoch and Andrei Gudkov
Prokaryotes of the genus Mycoplasma are the smallest cellular organisms that persist as obligate extracellular parasites. Although mycoplasma infection is known to be associated with chromosomal instability and can promote malignant transformation, the mechanisms underlying these phenomena remain unknown. Since persistence of many cellular parasites requires suppression of apoptosis in host cells, we tested the effect of mycoplasma infection on the activity of the p53 and nuclear factor (NF)-κB pathways, major mechanisms controlling programmed cell death. To monitor the activity of p53 and NF-κB in mycoplasma-infected cells, we used a panel of reporter cell lines expressing the bacterial β-galactosidase gene under the control of p53- or NF-κB-responsive promoters. Cells incubated with media conditioned with different species of mycoplasma showed constitutive activation of NF-κB and reduced activation of p53, common characteristics of the majority of human tumor cells, with M. arginini having the strongest effect among the species tested. Moreover, mycoplasma infection reduced the expression level and inducibility of an endogenous p53-responsive gene, p21waf1, and inhibited apoptosis induced by genotoxic stress. Infection with M. arginini made rat and mouse embryo fibroblasts susceptible to transformation with oncogenic H-Ras, whereas mycoplasma-free cells underwent irreversible p53-dependent growth arrest. Mycoplasma infection was as effective as shRNA-mediated knockdown of p53 expression in making rodent fibroblasts permissive to Ras-induced transformation. These observations indicate that mycoplasma infection plays the role of a p53-suppressing oncogene that cooperates with Ras in cell transformation and suggest that the carcinogenic and mutagenic effects of mycoplasma might be due to inhibition of p53 tumor suppressor function by this common human parasite.

1 March 2013 in Antiviral Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
STSergei V. Tillib
Sergei V. Tillib
TITatiana Ivanova
Tatiana Ivanova
LVLev A. Vasilev
Lev A. Vasilev
MRMarina V. Rutovskaya
Marina V. Rutovskaya
SSSeda A. Saakyan
Seda A. Saakyan
AGAlexander L. Gintsburg
Alexander L. Gintsburg

1 October 2013 in Infection and Immunity
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Amir I. TukhvatulinAmir I. Tukhvatulin
Amir I. Tukhvatulin
IGIlya I. Gitlin
Ilya I. Gitlin
DSDmitry V. Shcheblyakov
Dmitry V. Shcheblyakov
NANatalia M. Artemicheva
Natalia M. Artemicheva
LBLyudmila G. Burdelya
Lyudmila G. Burdelya
DLDenis Yurievich Logunov
Denis Yurievich Logunov
Pathogen recognition receptors (PRRs) are essential components of host innate immune systems that detect specific conserved pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) presented by microorganisms. Members of two families of PRRs, transmembrane Toll-like receptors (TLRs 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6) and cytosolic NOD receptors (NOD1 and NOD2), are stimulated upon recognition of various bacterial PAMPs. Such stimulation leads to induction of a number of immune defense reactions, mainly triggered via activation of the transcription factor NF-κB. While coordination of responses initiated via different PRRs sensing multiple PAMPS present during an infection makes clear biological sense for the host, such interactions have not been fully characterized. Here, we demonstrate that combined stimulation of NOD1 and TLR5 (as well as other NOD and TLR family members) strongly potentiates activity of NF-κB and induces enhanced levels of innate immune reactions (e.g., cytokine production) both in vitro and in vivo . Moreover, we show that an increased level of NF-κB activity plays a critical role in formation of downstream responses. In live mice, synergy between these receptors resulting in potentiation of NF-κB activity was organ specific, being most prominent in the gastrointestinal tract. Coordinated activity of NOD1 and TLR5 significantly increased protection of mice against enteroinvasive Salmonella infection. Obtained results suggest that cooperation of NOD and TLR receptors is important for effective responses to microbial infection in vivo .