Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) is a complex invasive procedure and the experience of the operator and the team is a major determinant of procedural outcomes. Because of very limited data available on minimum procedural volumes to enable training and ongoing competency for TLEs, we performed a meta-analysis aimed at assessing the outcomes of TLE in the centres with low, medium, and high volume of procedures. Of the 280 papers initially retrieved until February 2013, 66 observational studies met inclusion criteria and were included in at least one stratified meta-analysis: 17 were prospective studies; 47 had a retrospective design; and 2 were defined ‘experience studies’. We included only articles published after the introduction of laser technique (year 1999). We divided the studies in low, medium, and high volume centres utilizing either the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) or Lexicon classification criteria. When meta-analyses were carried out separately for the studies with larger and smaller sample sizes, either using EHRA or Lexicon classification criteria, no clear differences emerged in the combined rate of major complications or intraoperative deaths. In contrast, both minor complications and mortality at 30 days decreased as centre volume increased. In our meta-analysis of observational studies, patients who have been treated in higher volume centres have a lower probability of minor complications and death at 30 days regardless of the infection rate, length of lead duration, type of device, and type of extraction.

Background—: Radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation has been associated with some risk of thromboembolic events. Previous studies showed that preventive short episodes of forearm ischemia (remote ischemic preconditioning [IPC]) reduce exercise-induced platelet reactivity. In this study, we assessed whether remote IPC has any effect on platelet activation induced by radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation. Methods and Results—: We randomized 19 patients (age, 54.7±11 years; 17 male) undergoing radiofrequency catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation to receive remote IPC or sham intermittent forearm ischemia (control subjects) before the procedure. Blood venous samples were collected before and after remote IPC/sham ischemia, at the end of the ablation procedure, and 24 hours later. Platelet activation and reactivity were assessed by flow cytometry by measuring monocyte-platelet aggregate formation, platelet CD41 in the monocyte-platelet aggregate gate, and platelet CD41 and CD62 in the platelet gate in the absence and presence of ADP stimulation. At baseline, there were no differences between groups in platelet variables. Radiofrequency ablation induced platelet activation in both groups, which persisted after 24 hours. However, compared with control subjects, remote IPC patients showed a lower increase in all platelet variables, including monocyte-platelet aggregate formation ( P <0.0001), CD41 in the monocyte-platelet aggregate gate ( P =0.002), and CD41 ( P <0.0001) and CD62 ( P =0.002) in the platelet gate. Compared with control subjects, remote IPC was also associated with a significantly lower ADP-induced increase in all platelet markers. Conclusions—: Our data show that remote IPC before radiofrequency catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation significantly reduces the increased platelet activation and reactivity associated with the procedure.

Aims The number of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices has increased progressively, leading to an increased need for transvenous lead extraction (TLE) due to device infections. Previous studies described ‘ghost’ as a post-removal, new, tubular, mobile mass detected by echocardiography following the lead's intracardiac route in the right-sided heart chambers, associated with diagnosis of cardiac device-related infective endocarditis. We aimed to analyse the association between ‘ghosts’ assessed by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) and mortality in patients undergoing TLE. Methods and results We prospectively enrolled 217 patients (70 ± 13 years; 164 males) undergoing TLE for systemic infection (139), local device infection (67), and lead malfunction (11). All patients underwent TEE before and 48 h after TLE and ICE during TLE. Patients were allocated to two groups: either with (Group 1) or without (Group 2) post-procedural ‘ghost’. Mid-term clinical follow-up was obtained in all patients (11 months, IQR 1–34 months). We identified 30 (14%) patients with ‘ghost’, after TLE. The significant predictors of ‘ghost’ were Charlson co-morbidity index (HR = 1.24, 95% CI 1.04–1.48, P = 0.03) and diagnosis of endocarditis assessed by ICE (HR = 1.82, 95% CI 1.01–3.29, P = 0.04). Mortality was higher in Group 1 than in Group 2 (28 vs. 5%; log-rank P < 0.001). Independent predictors of mid-term mortality were the presence of ‘ghost’ and systemic infection as the clinical presentation of device infection (HR = 3.47, 95% CI 1.18–10.18, P = 0.002; HR = 3.39, 95% CI 1.15–9.95, P = 0.001, respectively). Conclusion The presence of ‘ghost’ could be an independent predictor of mortality after TLE, thus identifying a subgroup of patients who need closer clinical surveillance to promptly detect any complications.