Adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) reduces risk of breast cancer recurrence. However, suboptimal adherence and persistence to AET remain important clinical issues. Understanding factors associated with adherence may help inform efforts to improve use of AET as prescribed. The present systematic review examined potentially modifiable factors associated with adherence to AET in accordance with PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO registration ID: CRD42019124200). All studies were included, whether factors were significantly associated with adherence or results were null. This review also accounted for the frequency with which a potentially modifiable factor was examined and whether univariate or multivariate models were used. This review also examined whether methodological or sample characteristics were associated with the likelihood of a factor being associated with AET adherence. A total of 68 articles were included. Potentially modifiable factors were grouped into six categories: side effects, attitudes toward AET, psychological factors, healthcare provider-related factors, sociocultural factors, and general/quality of life factors. Side effects were less likely to be associated with adherence in studies with retrospective or cross-sectional than prospective designs. Self-efficacy (psychological factor) and positive decisional balance (attitude toward AET) were the only potentially modifiable factors examined ≥10 times and associated with adherence or persistence ≥75% of the time in both univariate and multivariate models. Self-efficacy and decisional balance (i.e., weight of pros vs. cons) were the potentially modifiable factors most consistently associated with adherence, and hence may be worth focusing on as targets for interventions to improve AET adherence among breast cancer survivors.

Purpose: Patients referred to cardiac rehabilitation after an acute coronary syndrome event commonly report strong intention to attend, but at least one-third do not participate. This study explored whether well-documented cardiac rehabilitation barriers (e.g., comorbidities, logistical/time constraints, and low social support) moderate the association between intention to participate and actual program enrollment and attendance. Method: Following referral but prior to commencing a 12-week outpatient cardiac rehabilitation program, 100 patients with acute coronary syndrome completed measures of intention to attend cardiac rehabilitation, perceived cardiac rehabilitation barriers, and social support. Program enrollment and attendance were determined by chart review. Results: Despite high reported intention to attend (M = 6.08/7.00, SD = 1.80), nearly one-in-five did not enroll. Weaker intention to attend (b = 0.46, SE = 0.16, p = 0.004) and greater cardiac rehabilitation barriers (b= −1.67, SE = 0.70, p = 0.017) corresponded to lower program enrollment. Similarly, weaker intention (b = 2.29, SE = 0.50, p < 0.001) and greater barriers (b =−6.19, SE = 1.55, p < 0.001) predicted poorer attendance. Barriers moderated the association between intention to participate and cardiac rehabilitation enrollment (b=−0.60, SE = 0.29, p = 0.037) and attendance (b = −3.12, SE = 1.02, p = 0.003). Conclusions: Perceived cardiac rehabilitation barriers influence whether patients successfully translate their intention to attend into actual program participation. Enhancing self-efficacy to overcome barriers may represent an important intervention target among prospective cardiac rehabilitation patients.