Amit Jain

Dr. Amit Jain


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2013 in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SSSohan Lal Solanki
Sohan Lal Solanki
NBN. A. Bharti
N. A. Bharti
YBY. K. Batra
Y. K. Batra
AJAmit Jain
Amit Jain
PKP. Kumar
P. Kumar
SNS. Nikhar
S. Nikhar
This randomised, double-blind study was designed to compare the duration of analgesia and adverse effects following intrathecal administration of dexmedetomidine or clonidine, both with bupivacaine, in trauma patients. Ninety adult trauma patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I—II, scheduled for lower limb surgery under subarachnoid block, were randomly allocated to one of three groups. All groups received hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% 3 ml, to which was added saline 0.5 ml (Group B): clonidine 50 μg (Group C) or dexmedetomidine 5 μg (Group D). The onset and duration of sensory and motor blockade, severity of postoperative pain, time to first rescue analgesia and total analgesic requirement for 24 hours were noted. There was no significant difference in the onset time of the block but the duration of sensory and motor blockade was prolonged in Groups C and D, compared with Group B. The time to analgesia was significantly prolonged in Group D (824±244 minutes) compared with Group C (678±178 minutes; P=0.01), the latter being longer than Group B (406±119 minutes; P=0.0001). Postoperative pain scores were lower in Groups C and D compared with Group B. The requirement for rescue analgesia during the first 24 postoperative hours was significantly less in Groups C and D as compared to Group B ( P=0.0001), but comparable between Group C and D ( P=0.203). In conclusion, dexmedetomidine 5 μg added to intrathecal bupivacaine 15 mg produces longer postoperative analgesia than clonidine 50 μg among trauma patients undergoing lower limb surgery.

18 May 2020 in Intensive Care Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AJAmit Jain
Amit Jain
DDD. John Doyle
D. John Doyle

1 July 2014 in Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DJDivya Jain
Divya Jain
MDMandeep Dhankar
Mandeep Dhankar
JWJyotsna Wig
Jyotsna Wig
AJAmit Jain
Amit Jain
CMAC videolaryngoscope has recently been introduced for videoscope guided intubation. The aim of our study was to compare and evaluate the efficacy of the conventional blade and the angulated D blade of the CMAC videolaryngoscope with the direct laryngoscopes in simulated cervical spine injury patients on the airway manikin. Following power analysis, 33 resident doctors were enrolled to perform endotracheal intubation using all the 4 different laryngoscopes namely the Macintosh laryngoscope, McCoy laryngoscope, conventional CMAC videolaryngoscope and the D blade of the CMAC videolaryngoscopes on the airway manikin in simulated cervical spine injury. The demographic variables of the resident doctors were recorded. The outcomes measured included vocal cord visualization (Cormack-Lehane grading), time taken to intubate, number of attempts for successful intubation and optimizing maneuvers required. The use of indirect videolaryngoscopes resulted in better glottic visualization in comparison to the direct laryngoscopes (CL-I) in 20/33 (60.6%) in the Macintosh group, 24/33 (72.7%) in McCoy group, 30/33 in (90.9%) in Vlc group and 32/33 (96.9%) in Vld group. The time taken to intubate averaged to 15.54±2.6 in Macintosh group, 18.90±4.47 in McCoy group, 20.21±7.9 in Vlc group and 27.42±9.09 in Vld group. The 1st attempt intubation success rate was 84.8% (Macintosh), 72.7% (McCoy), 90.9% (Vlc) and, 78.7% (Vld). The overall performance of the conventional CMAC blade proved to be the best when compared with the D-blade CMAC, Macintosh blade and the McCoy blade for intubation in simulated cervical spine patients by anesthesia residents.

1 July 2011 in Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SSSohan Lal Solanki
Sohan Lal Solanki
AJAmit Jain
Amit Jain
ASAmanjot Singh
Amanjot Singh
ASArun Sharma
Arun Sharma
Tetrology of Fallot (TOF) is the most commonly encountered congenital cardiac lesion in pregnancy. Although there are controversies regarding safe anesthetic technique for parturient with TOF, we use low-dose sequential combined-spinal epidural anesthesia in such a case posted for Cesarean section and found that low dose (0.5 ml of 0.5%) intrathecal bupivacaine and fentanyl with sequential epidural bupivacaine supplementation was adequate for the performance of an uncomplicated Cesarean section with minimal side effects and good fetal outcome. Thus, though the choice of anesthesia can vary in such patients, low-dose sequential combined-spinal epidural can be a safe alternate to achieve good anesthesia with impressive cardiovascular stability.

14 October 2020 in British Journal of Anaesthesia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AJAmit Jain
Amit Jain
MLMassimo Lamperti
Massimo Lamperti
DDD. John Doyle
D. John Doyle

1 January 2011 in Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SSSohan Lal Solanki
Sohan Lal Solanki
IBIshwar Bhukal
Ishwar Bhukal
SKSushil Kumar
Sushil Kumar
AJAmit Jain
Amit Jain
Objectives: The incidence of shivering in patients undergoing a laparoscopic procedure is stated to be about 40%. A majority of laparoscopic gynecological procedures are taken up on an outpatient basis. Postoperative shivering may delay hospital discharge and is a common cause of discomfort in patients recovering from anesthesia. Aims: To determine the effect of pre-induction, low-dose pethidine on postoperative shivering in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgeries. Setting and Design: Sixty females between 25 and 35 years of age, of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class 1 and 2, were randomly divided into three groups of 20 patients each. Group I and II patients received i.v. pethidine 0.3 mg/kg and 0.5 mg/kg, respectively, while Group III received i.v. 0.9% normal saline just before induction of general anesthesia. Temperature of the Operating Room and the Post Anesthesia Care Unit was standardized and all fluids given during the study period were warmed to 37°C. Materials and Methods: Temperature, measured with a tympanic membrane probe, was recorded preoperatively, after induction of anesthesia, on arrival at the Post Anesthesia Care Unit, and postoperatively at 15 minutes and 30 minutes. Shivering was graded (0 - 4 scale) at arrival of the patients to the PACU and every five minutes thereafter, up to 30 minutes. Statistical Analysis: ANOVA, Chi-square test, Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA and Mann-Whitney U tests were used. A P-value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Core body temperatures were statistically insignificant between groups at pre-induction, post-induction, and in the PACU (P > 0.05). At the end of surgery, shivering was present in 18 patients (30%). In groups I, II, and III, six (30%), three (15%), and nine (45%) patients shivered, respectively. The differences in incidence and grading of shivering among groups was found to be statistically insignificant (P > 0.05). The core body temperature of shiverers and non-shiverers were compared. In the PACU at 0, 15, and 30 minutes, the temperature among shiverers was significantly lower than that in the non-shiverers. Rescue drug i.v. pethidine 20 mg was given to patients with shivering grade ≥2. None of the patients had shivering after 10 minutes. Conclusions: Prophylactic pre-induction, low-dose pethidine does not have major role in preventing postoperative shivering.