Simon Mark Dahl Baunwall

Dr. Simon Mark Dahl Baunwall

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
27 November 2018 in Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KKKonstantin Kazankov
Konstantin Kazankov
SBSimon Mark Dahl Baunwall
Simon Mark Dahl Baunwall
KTKaren Louise Thomsen
Karen Louise Thomsen
HMHolger Jon Møller
Holger Jon Møller
HVHendrik Vilstrup
Hendrik Vilstrup
Henning GrønbækHenning Grønbæk
Henning Grønbæk

1 April 2019 in Gastroenterology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CHChristian Lodberg Hvas
Christian Lodberg Hvas
SBSimon Mark Dahl Baunwall
Simon Mark Dahl Baunwall
SJSøren Peter Jørgensen
Søren Peter Jørgensen
MSMerete Storgaard
Merete Storgaard
LLLars Lemming
Lars Lemming
JDJens Frederik Dahlerup
Jens Frederik Dahlerup
Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is recommended for treatment of recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (rCDI). We performed a single-center randomized trial to compare the effects of FMT with those of fidaxomicin and vancomycin. We studied consecutive adults with rCDI seen at a gastroenterology clinic in Denmark from April 5, 2016 through June 10, 2018. Patients were randomly assigned to a group that received FMT, applied by colonoscopy or nasojejunal tube, after 4-10 days of vancomycin (125 mg 4 times daily; FMTv; n = 24), 10 days of fidaxomicin (200 mg twice daily; n = 24), or 10 days of vancomycin (125 mg 4 times daily; n = 16). Patients who had rCDI after this course of treatment and patients who could not be randomly assigned to groups were offered rescue FMTv. The primary outcome was combined clinical resolution and a negative result from a polymerase chain reaction test for Clostridium difficile (CD) toxin 8 weeks after the allocated treatment. Secondary end points included clinical resolution at week 8. All 64 patients received their assigned treatment. The combination of clinical resolution and negative results from the test for CD were observed in 17 patients given FMTv (71%), 8 patients given fidaxomicin (33%), and 3 patients given vancomycin (19%; P = .009 for FMTv vs fidaxomicin; P = .001 for FMTv vs vancomycin; P = .31 for fidaxomicin vs vancomycin). Clinical resolution was observed in 22 patients given FMTv (92%), 10 patients given fidaxomicin (42%), and 3 patients given vancomycin (19%; P = .0002; P < .0001; P = .13). Results did not differ significantly between patients who received FMTv as their initial therapy and patients who received rescue FMTv. There was 1 serious adverse event that might have been related to FMTv. In a randomized trial of patients with rCDI, we found the FMTv combination superior to fidaxomicin or vancomycin based on end points of clinical and microbiological resolution or clinical resolution alone. ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02743234; EudraCT, j.no 2015-003004-24.

1 December 2020 in eClinicalMedicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SBSimon Mark Dahl Baunwall
Simon Mark Dahl Baunwall
MLMads Ming Lee
Mads Ming Lee
MEMarcel Kjærsgaard Eriksen
Marcel Kjærsgaard Eriksen
BMBenjamin H. Mullish
Benjamin H. Mullish
JMJulian R. Marchesi
Julian R. Marchesi
CHChristian Lodberg Hvas
Christian Lodberg Hvas
Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is effective for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), but inconsistent effect rates and uncertain evidence levels have warranted caution. To clarify, we aimed to establish the evidence of FMT for recurrent CDI, updated across different delivery methods, treatment regimens, and in comparison with standard antibiotics. In this updated systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, Clinical Key, and Svemed+ for FMT literature published in English until November 11, 2019. We included observational and clinical trials with or without antibiotic comparators and excluded studies with below 8 weeks follow-up and fewer than 15 patients. The primary outcome was clinical outcome by week 8. We comprehensively extracted patient and procedural data. In a random-effects meta-analysis, we estimated the clinical effect for repeat or single FMT, different delivery methods, and versus antibiotics. We rated the evidence according to the Cochrane and GRADE methods. The PROSPERO preregistration number is CRD42020158112. Of 1816 studies assessed, 45 studies were included. The overall clinical effect week 8 following repeat FMT (24 studies, 1855 patients) was 91% (95% CI: 89–94%, I2=53%) and 84% (80–88%, I2=86%) following single FMT (43 studies, 2937 patients). Delivery by lower gastrointestinal endoscopy was superior to all other delivery methods, and repeat FMT significantly increased the treatment effect week 8 (P<0·001). Compared with vancomycin, the number needed to treat (NNT) for repeat FMT was 1·5 (1·3–1·9, P<0·001) and 2.9 (1·5–37·1, P=0·03) for single FMT. Repeat FMT had high quality of evidence. High-quality evidence supports FMT is effective for recurrent CDI, but its effect varies with the delivery method and the number of administrations. The superior NNT for FMT compared with antibiotics suggests that patients may benefit from advancing FMT to all instances of recurrent CDI. Innovation Fund Denmark (j.no. 8056-00006B).

9 March 2021 in United European Gastroenterology Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JKJosbert J. Keller
Josbert J. Keller
RORogier E. Ooijevaar
Rogier E. Ooijevaar
CHChristian L. Hvas
Christian L. Hvas
ETElisabeth M. Terveer
Elisabeth M. Terveer
SLSimone C. Lieberknecht
Simone C. Lieberknecht
MVMaria J. G. T. Vehreschild
Maria J. G. T. Vehreschild
Background: Faecal microbiota transplantation is an emerging therapeutic option, particularly for the treatment of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection. Stool banks that organise recruitment and screening of faeces donors are being embedded within the regulatory frameworks described in the European Union Tissue and Cells Directive and the technical guide to the quality and safety of tissue and cells for human application, published by the European Council.Objective: Several European and international consensus statements concerning faecal microbiota transplantation have been issued. While these documents provide overall guidance, we aim to provide a detailed description of all processes that relate to the collection, handling and clinical application of human donor stool in this document.Methods: Collaborative subgroups of experts on stool banking drafted concepts for all domains pertaining to stool banking. During a working group meeting in the United European Gastroenterology Week 2019 in Barcelona, these concepts were discussed and finalised to be included in our overall guidance document about faecal microbiota transplantation.Results: A guidance document for all domains pertaining to stool banking was created. This document includes standard operating manuals for several processes involved with stool banking, such as handling of donor material, storage and donor screening.Conclusion: The implementation of faecal microbiota transplantation by stool banks in concordance with our guidance document will enable quality assurance and guarantee the availability of donor faeces preparations for patients.

22 September 2022 in The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SBSimon Mark Dahl Baunwall
Simon Mark Dahl Baunwall
SASara Ellegaard Andreasen
Sara Ellegaard Andreasen
MHMette Mejlby Hansen
Mette Mejlby Hansen
JKJens Kelsen
Jens Kelsen
KHKatrine Lundby Høyer
Katrine Lundby Høyer
CHChristian Lodberg Hvas
Christian Lodberg Hvas

19 July 2021 in The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SBSimon Mark Dahl Baunwall
Simon Mark Dahl Baunwall
ETElisabeth M Terveer
Elisabeth M Terveer
JDJens Frederik Dahlerup
Jens Frederik Dahlerup
CEChristian Erikstrup
Christian Erikstrup
PAPerttu Arkkila
Perttu Arkkila
CHChristian Lodberg Hvas
Christian Lodberg Hvas
Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is an emerging treatment modality, but its current clinical use and organisation are unknown. We aimed to describe the clinical use, conduct, and potential for FMT in Europe. We invited all hospital-based FMT centres within the European Council member states to answer a web-based questionnaire covering their clinical activities, organisation, and regulation of FMT in 2019. Responders were identified from trials registered at clinicaltrials.gov and from the United European Gastroenterology (UEG) working group for stool banking and FMT. In 2019, 31 FMT centres from 17 countries reported a total of 1,874 (median 25, quartile 10–64) FMT procedures; 1,077 (57%) with Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) as indication, 791 (42%) with experimental indications, and 6 (0•3%) unaccounted for. Adjusted to population size, 0•257 per 100,000 population received FMT for CDI and 0•189 per 100,000 population for experimental indications. With estimated 12,400 (6,100–28,500) annual cases of multiple, recurrent CDI and indication for FMT in Europe, the current European FMT activity covers approximately 10% of the patients with indication. The participating centres demonstrated high safety standards and adherence to international consensus guidelines. Formal or informal regulation from health authorities was present at 21 (68%) centres. FMT is a widespread routine treatment for multiple, recurrent CDI and an experimental treatment. Embedded within hospital settings, FMT centres operate with high standards across Europe to provide safe FMT. A significant gap in FMT coverage suggests the need to raise clinical awareness and increase the FMT activity in Europe by at least 10-fold to meet the true, indicated need. NordForsk under the Nordic Council and Innovation Fund Denmark (j.no. 8056–00006B).