The tolerance and efficacy of oxaliplatin and irinotecan for metastatic colorectal cancer are unknown in elderly patients. Methods. All consecutive patients over 74 years treated with oxaliplatin or irinotecan for metastatic colorectal cancer were enrolled. The tumour response was assessed every 2-3 months and toxicity was collected at each cycle according to World Health Organisation criteria. A total of 66 patients were enrolled from 12 centres. The median age was 78 years (range, 75-88 years); 39 patients had no severe comorbidity according to the Charlson score. In total, 44 and 22 patients received oxaliplatin or irinotecan, respectively, in combination with 5-fluororuracil+/-folinic acid or raltitrexed in 64 patients. A total of 545 chemotherapy cycles were administered in first (41%), second (51%) or third line (8%). A dose reduction occurred in 190 cycles (35%). Complete response, partial response and stabilisation occurred in 1.5, 20 and 47% of patients, respectively. The median time to progression and overall survival were 6.8 and 11.2 months in first line and 6.3 and 11.6 months in second line, respectively. Grade 3 and 4 toxicity occurred in 42% of patients: neutropenia 17%, diarrhoea 15%, neuropathy 11%, nausea and vomiting 8% and thrombopenia 6%. There was no treatment-related death. In selected elderly patients, chemotherapy with oxaliplatin or irinotecan is feasible with manageable toxicity.

After surgical resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), patients are predominantly treated with adjuvant chemotherapy, commonly consisting of gemcitabine-based regimens or the modified FOLFIRINOX regimen (mFFX). While mFFX has been shown to be more effective than gemcitabine-based regimens, it is also associated with higher toxicity. Current treatment decisions are based on patient performance status rather than on the molecular characteristics of the tumor. To address this gap, the goal of this study was to develop drug-specific transcriptomic signatures for personalized chemotherapy treatment. We used PDAC datasets from preclinical models, encompassing chemotherapy response profiles for the mFFX-regimen components. From them we identified specific gene transcripts associated with chemotherapy response. Three transcriptomic AI-signatures were obtained by combining Independent Component Analysis, Least Absolute Shrinkage and the Selection Operator-Random Forest approach. We integrated a previously developed gemcitabine signature with three newly developed ones. The machine learning strategy employed to enhance these signatures incorporates transcriptomic features from the tumor microenvironment, leading to the development of the Pancreas-View tool ultimately clinically validated in a cohort of 343 patients from the PRODIGE-24/CCTG PA6 trial. Patients who were predicted to be sensitive to the administered drugs (n=164; 47.8%) had longer disease-free survival (DFS) than the other patients. The median DFS in the mFFX sensitive group treated with mFFX was 50.0 months (stratified HR: 0.31; 95% CI, 0.21-0.44; p<0.001) and 33.7 months (stratified HR: 0.40; 95% CI, 0.17-0.59; p<0.001) in the gemcitabine sensitive group when treated with gemcitabine. Comparatively patients with signature predictions unmatched with the treatments (n=86; 25.1%) or those resistant to all drugs (n=93; 27.1%) had shorter DFS (10.6 and 10.8 months, respectively). This study presents a transcriptome-based tool that was developed using preclinical models and machine learning to accurately predict sensitivity to mFFX and gemcitabine.

PURPOSE: GEMPAX was an open-label, randomized phase III clinical trial designed to assess the efficacy and tolerability of gemcitabine plus paclitaxel versus gemcitabine alone as second-line treatment for patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) who previously received 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan. METHODS: Patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed mPDAC were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive GEMPAX (paclitaxel 80 mg/m² + gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m²; IV; once at day (D) 1, D8, and D15/arm A) or gemcitabine (arm B) alone once at D1, D8, and D15 every 28 days until progression, toxicity, or patient's decision. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), quality of life, and safety. RESULTS: Overall, 211 patients (median age, 64 [30-86] years; 62% male) were included. After a median study follow-up for alive patients of 13.4 versus 13.8 months in arm A versus arm B, the median OS (95% CI) was 6.4 (5.2 to 7.4) versus 5.9 months (4.6 to 6.9; hazard ratio [HR], 0.87 [0.63 to 1.20]; P = 0.4095), the median PFS was 3.1 (2.2 to 4.3) versus 2.0 months (1.9 to 2.3; HR, 0.64 [0.47 to 0.89]; P = 0.0067), and the ORR was 17.1% (11.3 to 24.4) versus 4.2% (0.9 to 11.9; P = 0.008) in arm A versus arm B, respectively. Overall, 16.7% of patients in arm A and 2.9% in arm B discontinued their treatment because of adverse events (AEs). One grade 5 AE associated with both gemcitabine and paclitaxel was reported in arm A (acute respiratory distress), and 58.0% versus 27.1% of patients experienced grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs in arm A versus arm B, among which 15.2% versus 4.3% had anemia, 15.9% versus 15.7% had neutropenia, 19.6% versus 4.3% had thrombocytopenia, 10.1% versus 2.9% had asthenia and 12.3% versus 0.0% had neuropathy. CONCLUSION: While GEMPAX did not meet the primary end point of OS versus gemcitabine alone in patients with mPDAC in the second-line setting, both PFS and ORR were significantly improved.

PURPOSE: More than 30% of patients with pancreatic cancer are unresectable because of the local extension with a median overall survival (OS) of 60 years). Patients received FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine for 6 months. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Main secondary end points were OS, time to treatment failure, quality of life, and safety. One hundred seventy patients (142 events) were needed to detect an increase of 3 months in PFS with 80% power (log-rank test, 5% two-sided α). RESULTS: One hundred seventy one patients age 35-84 years were included and followed for a maximum of 5 years. With a median follow-up of 59.6 months (95% CI, 42.3 to not reached), 168 events were observed and the median PFS was 9.7 months (95% CI, 7.0 to 11.7) with FOLFIRINOX versus 7.7 months (95% CI, 6.2 to 9.2) with gemcitabine, hazard ratio (HR), 0.7 (95% CI, 0.5 to 1.0), P = .04. The median OS was 15.7 months (95% CI, 11.9 to 20.4) in the FOLFIRINOX group versus 15.4 months (95% CI, 11.7 to 18.6) in the gemcitabine group, HR, 1.02 (95% CI, 0.73 to 1.43), P = .95. CONCLUSION: Results confirm that FOLFIRINOX improves PFS significantly compared with gemcitabine and is well tolerated in LAPC. No significant difference in OS was observed between both groups.

PURPOSE: Alkylating agents (ALKY) are the main chemotherapies used for advanced neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). O ⁶ -Methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) status, as proficient (p) or deficient (d), may predict the response to ALKY. PATIENTS AND METHODS: MGMT-NET (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03217097 ) was a phase II trial randomly assigning 1:1 for pMGMT or 2:1 for dMGMT-NETs to either ALKY or oxaliplatin (Ox). Inclusion criteria were a confirmed advanced pancreatic, thoracic, or unknown primary NETs with an indication for chemotherapy and tissue available. The primary aim was to detect a difference of 35% between the 3-month objective response rate (ORR) in pMGMT-NETs versus in dMGMT-NETs when treated with ALKY. A biomarker-stratified design was performed to compare ALKY and Ox in the dMGMT and pMGMT strata for the secondary end points. dMGMT was defined using pyrosequencing (PSQ; methylated MGMT ≥9%) and using immunochemistry ( H -score of MGMT <50) when PSQ was not interpretable. RESULTS: From October 2018 to October 2021, 105 patients (55 pancreas, 38 thorax, 12 unknown) started either ALKY (n = 62) or Ox (n = 43). The median age was 63 years (range, 30-84), and 59% were males. NETs were G1 (19%), G2 (69%), or G3 (10%). Among patients with interpretable MGMT status, 56.9% (58 of 102) had a dMGMT-NET. The primary end point was not reached; the 3-month ORR was 10 (29.4%) versus 2 (8%), and the odds ratio was 3.5 (0.58-21.16), P = .172. However, best ORR (18 [52.9%] v 3 [11.5%]) and median progression-free survival (14.6 [95% CI, 7.2 to 22.1] v 11.3 [9.4 to 13.2] months) were higher for dMGMT-NETs versus pMGMT-NETs. MGMT status does not seem to affect the Ox efficacy. CONCLUSION: Despite the fact that the primary end point was not reached, ALKY has clinical activity in patients with dMGMT-NETs.

Neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC) of the anus or the rectum are a rare disease, accounting for less than 1% of all digestive malignancies. Most are metastatic at diagnosis and treated with a platinum-based chemotherapy. No guidelines for localized tumors exist. The purpose of this study was to describe the characteristics of anorectal localized NEC, their management and their outcomes. We retrospectively reviewed patients from 11 French centers with anorectal localized NEC. We compared 2 therapeutic managements: surgery (group A) versus chemotherapy with or without radiation (group B). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated with the Kaplan–Meier method. A total of 24 patients were identified with a median follow-up of 25 months (3–60 months). Median age was 63 years old and 17 had a rectal tumor (71%). Mean Ki-67 was 72% (range: 20–100), and 75% of the tumors had a high proliferative index (Ki-67 > 50%). Global PFS and OS were 13.1 and 44.1 months, respectively. Thirty-seven percent of patients were in group A and 63% in group B. There was no difference between group A and group B, whether in terms of PFS (13.0 months vs. 13.2 months, P = 0.75) or OS (49.1 months vs. 39.2 months, P = 0.42). In patients with anorectal localized NEC, chemotherapy with or without radiation obtained a similar outcome as surgery and this conservative approach could be deemed a reasonable option.