Gianluigi Rozza

Prof. Dr. Gianluigi Rozza

SISSA, Mathematics Area, mathLab International School for Advanced Studies Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati Office A-435, Via Bonomea 265, 34136 Trieste, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
26 July 2022 in Journal of Scientific Computing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Salvatore CuomoSalvatore Cuomo
Salvatore Cuomo
VCVincenzo Schiano Di Cola
Vincenzo Schiano Di Cola
FGFabio Giampaolo
Fabio Giampaolo
Gianluigi RozzaGianluigi Rozza
Gianluigi Rozza
MRMaziar Raissi
Maziar Raissi
FPFrancesco Piccialli
Francesco Piccialli
Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINN) are neural networks (NNs) that encode model equations, like Partial Differential Equations (PDE), as a component of the neural network itself. PINNs are nowadays used to solve PDEs, fractional equations, integral-differential equations, and stochastic PDEs. This novel methodology has arisen as a multi-task learning framework in which a NN must fit observed data while reducing a PDE residual. This article provides a comprehensive review of the literature on PINNs: while the primary goal of the study was to characterize these networks and their related advantages and disadvantages. The review also attempts to incorporate publications on a broader range of collocation-based physics informed neural networks, which stars form the vanilla PINN, as well as many other variants, such as physics-constrained neural networks (PCNN), variational hp-VPINN, and conservative PINN (CPINN). The study indicates that most research has focused on customizing the PINN through different activation functions, gradient optimization techniques, neural network structures, and loss function structures. Despite the wide range of applications for which PINNs have been used, by demonstrating their ability to be more feasible in some contexts than classical numerical techniques like Finite Element Method (FEM), advancements are still possible, most notably theoretical issues that remain unresolved.

21 May 2008 in Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Gianluigi RozzaGianluigi Rozza
Gianluigi Rozza
DHD. B. P. Huynh
D. B. P. Huynh
APA. T. Patera
A. T. Patera

1 January 2007 in Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Gianluigi RozzaGianluigi Rozza
Gianluigi Rozza
KVKaren Veroy
Karen Veroy


1 September 2020 in Journal of Computational Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SHSaddam Hijazi
Saddam Hijazi
Giovanni StabileGiovanni Stabile
Giovanni Stabile
AMAndrea Mola
Andrea Mola
Gianluigi RozzaGianluigi Rozza
Gianluigi Rozza

15 October 2007 in Comptes Rendus Mathematique
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DHD.B.P. Huynh
D.B.P. Huynh
Gianluigi RozzaGianluigi Rozza
Gianluigi Rozza
SSS. Sen
S. Sen
APA.T. Patera
A.T. Patera
We present an approach to the construction of lower bounds for the coercivity and inf–sup stability constants required in a posteriori error analysis of reduced basis approximations to affinely parametrized partial differential equations. The method, based on an Offline–Online strategy relevant in the reduced basis many-query and real-time context, reduces the Online calculation to a small Linear Program: the objective is a parametric expansion of the underlying Rayleigh quotient; the constraints reflect stability information at optimally selected parameter points. Numerical results are presented for coercive elasticity and non-coercive acoustics Helmholtz problems.