George P. Naughton

Dr. George P. Naughton


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
22 September 2006 in River Research and Applications
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GNGeorge P. Naughton
George P. Naughton
CCChristopher C Caudill
Christopher C Caudill
CPChristopher A. Peery
Christopher A. Peery
TCTami S. Clabough
Tami S. Clabough
MJMichael A. Jepson
Michael A. Jepson
LSLowell C. Stuehrenberg
Lowell C. Stuehrenberg

23 December 2017 in North American Journal of Fisheries Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GNGeorge P. Naughton
George P. Naughton
MKMatthew L. Keefer
Matthew L. Keefer
TCTami S. Clabough
Tami S. Clabough
MKMatthew J. Knoff
Matthew J. Knoff
TBTimothy J. Blubaugh
Timothy J. Blubaugh
CCChristopher C Caudill
Christopher C Caudill

27 February 2021 in Water
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GNGeorge P. Naughton
George P. Naughton
Zeb HoganZeb Hogan
Zeb Hogan
TCTeresa Campbell
Teresa Campbell
PGPeter J. Graf
Peter J. Graf
CFCharles Farwell
Charles Farwell
NSNaruepon Sukumasavin
Naruepon Sukumasavin
Research on fish movement and habitat use in large tropical rivers is urgently needed to protect fisheries that are a primary source of protein for millions of people. In this pilot study, acoustic telemetry was used to monitor movements of wild catfishes in a 94.6 rkm reach of Mekong River, where it functions as the border between Thailand and Lao People’s Democratic Republic (PDR). Twenty fish were tagged and released in May 2006 and monitored through May 2007 with 17 fixed-site acoustic receivers. Ten receivers had detection probabilities ranging from 0.67 to 1.00, and five receivers had detection probabilities of 0.50 or less. Detection probability was not correlated with river width. Eighteen (90%) of the tagged fish were detected by at least one receiver. Monitoring durations of individual fish ranged from 0.1 to 354.4 days. The longest total movement was 88.3 rkm, while the longest upstream movement was 52.1 rkm. Movement rates ranged from 0.1 to 156.7 rkm/d. This work provided preliminary data on movement patterns of wild Mekong catfishes. The methods and lessons learned from this study can be used for future positional telemetry research to address management-relevant uncertainties about migration corridors, habitat use, efficacy of fish reserves, and river development planning.

25 October 2017 in North American Journal of Fisheries Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GNGeorge P. Naughton
George P. Naughton
MKMatthew L. Keefer
Matthew L. Keefer
TCTami S. Clabough
Tami S. Clabough
MKMatthew J. Knoff
Matthew J. Knoff
TBTimothy J. Blubaugh
Timothy J. Blubaugh
CCChristopher C. Caudill
Christopher C. Caudill
We conducted a field experiment to test the hypothesis that intragastric radio-tagging contributed to increased prespawn mortality (PSM) of adult Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) after collection and transport to spawning sites above high-head hydroelectric dams. We assessed PSM rates of 970 wild and hatchery Chinook Salmon collected during trap-and-haul operations that were released untagged, tagged with PIT tags only, or double-tagged with PIT tags and radio transmitters, and then recovered as carcasses in two Willamette River (Oregon) tributaries from 2009–2015. Results revealed no evidence PSM rates were higher in PIT-tagged samples compared to untagged (but not unhandled) control samples. PSM rates in double-tagged samples were variable among years and between locations and indicated that radio-tagging effects were absent or small in effect size, on average, within each population. While we did not detect a consistent negative double-tagging effect across locations and years, results suggest that the potential for radio-tagging effects should be incorporated in study planning and design. We recommend that researchers use experimental designs that include control groups for directly evaluating tagging and handling effects on study outcomes. Received 28 Jun 2017 accepted 19 Oct 2017 revised 03 Oct 2017