Aims: Histological analysis of brain tissue samples provides valuable information about the pathological processes leading to common neurodegenerative disorders. In this context, the development of novel high‐resolution imaging approaches is a current challenge in neuroscience.Methods: To this end, we used a recent super‐resolution imaging technique called STochastic Optical Reconstruction Microscopy (STORM) to analyse human brain sections. We combined STORM cell imaging protocols with neuropathological techniques to image cryopreserved brain samples from control subjects and patients with neurodegenerative diseases.Results: This approach allowed us to perform 2D‐, 3D‐ and two‐colour‐STORM in neocortex, white matter and brainstem samples. STORM proved to be particularly effective at visualizing the organization of dense protein inclusions and we imaged with a <50 nm resolution pathological aggregates within the central nervous system of patients with Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, Lewy body dementia and fronto‐temporal lobar degeneration. Aggregated Aβ branches appeared reticulated and cross‐linked in the extracellular matrix, with widths from 60 to 240 nm. Intraneuronal Tau and TDP‐43 inclusions were denser, with a honeycomb pattern in the soma and a filamentous organization in the axons. Finally, STORM imaging of α‐synuclein pathology revealed the internal organization of Lewy bodies that could not be observed by conventional fluorescence microscopy.Conclusions: STORM imaging of human brain samples opens further gates to a more comprehensive understanding of common neurological disorders. The convenience of this technique should open a straightforward extension of its application for super‐resolution imaging of the human brain, with promising avenues to current challenges in neuroscience.

The cornea is a multi-layered structure which allows fine refraction and provides both resistance to external insults and adequate transparency. The corneal endothelium ensures stromal hydration, failure of which, such as in Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy, after trauma or in aging, may lead to loss of corneal transparency and induce blindness. Currently, no efficient therapeutic alternatives exist except for corneal grafting. Thus corneal tissue engineering represents a valuable alternative approach, which may overcome cornea donor shortage. Several studies describe protocols to isolate, differentiate, and cultivate corneal endothelial cells (CEnCs) in vitro. Two main in vitro strategies can be described: expansion of eye-native cell populations, such as CEnCs, or the production and expansion of CEnCs from non-eye native cell populations, such as induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (iPSCs). The challenge with these cells is to obtain a monolayer of CEnCs on a biocompatible carrier, with a specific morphology (flat hexagonal cells), and with specific functions such as programmed cell cycle arrest. Another issue for this cell culture methodology is to define the adapted protocol (media, trophic factors, timeframe) that can mimic physiological development. Additionally, contamination by other cell types still represents a huge problem. Thus, purification methods, such as Fluorescence Activated Cell Sorting (FACS), Magnetic Ativated Cell Sorting (MACS) or Sedimentation Field Flow Fractionation (SdFFF) are useful. Animal models are also crucial to provide a translational approach for these therapies, integrating macro- and microenvironment influences, systemic hormonal or immune responses, and exogenous interactions. Non-eye native cell graft protocols are constantly improving both in efficacy and safety, with the aim of being the most suitable candidate for corneal therapies in future routine practice. The aim of this work is to review these different aspects with a special focus on issues facing CEnC culture in vitro, and to highlight animal graft models adapted to screen the efficacy of these different protocols.

Infiltration of the peripheral nervous system (PNS) by lymphoma, called neurolymphomatosis, is a rare condition among the spectrum of lymphoma-associated neuropathies; its diagnosis is challenging. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis is of great value, but nerve biopsy (NB) may be necessary to prove invasion by malignant cells. Clonality polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based analysis is a validated method in the diagnosis of hematological malignancies, but there are very little data on its diagnostic yield on NB samples. We explored the contribution of NB with clonality analysis to the diagnosis of neurolymphomatosis in 15 patients with negative CSF analysis. Moreover, we assessed the performance of clonality testing in a case-control manner, using patients with inflammatory infiltrates on NB as controls. Neurolymphomatosis was the first manifestation of lymphoma in 60% and could be diagnosed on routine histology alone in 40%. Clonality testing showed monoclonal rearrangement in 86.7% and was unsuccessful in 8.1%. Performance of clonality testing was as follows: 92.9% positive predictive value, 90% negative predictive value, 86.7% sensitivity, 94.7% specificity. This study confirms the diagnostic challenge of neurolymphomatosis, the usefulness of NB in patients with negative CSF analysis, and highlights the high yield of PCR-based clonality testing to assess the malignant nature of PNS lymphoid infiltrates.

Introduction: Peripheral neuropathy is a common symptom throughout the population, with numerous possible etiologies. The diagnosis of peripheral neuropathies (and their causes) is mainly based on clinical, electrophysiological, biological, and imaging features. Areas covered: This paper reviews the main causes of neuropathy and discusses the usefulness of nerve biopsy (NB) in such cases. Expert commentary: In most cases, NB is not mandatory in the diagnostic work-up of a peripheral neuropathy. However, NB is clearly an indication in cases of vasculitis. It is also valuable in peripheral neuropathies with severe and rapid worsening (without clear cause) in order to uncover a pathological hallmark (amyloid deposits). Although NB is considered an invasive method, it may be useful in the management of peripheral neuropathy, especially to guide treatment in certain cases. In summary, although NB is not a systematic procedure, it is a useful tool that should be discussed on a case-by-case basis within the clinical context.