Nancy E. Kemeny

Dr. Nancy E. Kemeny


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

32Years (1995-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 March 2006 in Journal of Clinical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NKNancy E. Kemeny
Nancy E. Kemeny
DNDonna Niedzwiecki
Donna Niedzwiecki
DHDonna R. Hollis
Donna R. Hollis
HLHeinz-Josef Lenz
Heinz-Josef Lenz
RWRobert S. Warren
Robert S. Warren
RMRobert J. Mayer
Robert J. Mayer
Purpose: Hepatic metastases derive most of their blood supply from the hepatic artery; therefore, for patients with hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer, hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) of chemotherapy may improve outcome. Methods: In a multi-institutional trial, 135 patients were randomly assigned to receive HAI versus systemic bolus fluorouracil and leucovorin. The primary end point was survival; secondary end points were response, recurrence, toxicity, quality of life, cost, and the influence of molecular markers. Results: Overall survival was significantly longer for HAI versus systemic treatment (median, 24.4 v 20 months; P = .0034), as were response rates (47% and 24%; P = .012) and time to hepatic progression (THP; 9.8 v 7.3 months; P = .034). Time to extrahepatic progression (7.7 v 14.8 months; P = .029) was significantly shorter in the HAI group. Quality-of-life measurements showed improved physical functioning in the HAI group at the 3- and 6-month follow-up assessments. Toxicity included grade ≥ 3 neutropenia (2% and 45%; P < .01), stomatitis (0% and 24%; P < .01), and bilirubin elevation (18.6% and 0; P < .01) in the HAI and systemic treatment groups, respectively. A greater proportion of men versus women receiving HAI experienced biliary toxicity (37% and 15%, respectively; P = .05). For HAI patients with thymidylate synthase levels in tumor less than or ≥ 4, the median survival was 24 and 14 months, respectively (P = .17). Conclusion: HAI therapy increased overall survival, response rate, THP, and was associated with better physical functioning compared with systemic therapy. Additional studies need to address the overall benefit and cost of new chemotherapy agents versus HAI alone or the combination of HAI with new agents.

20 July 2009 in Journal of Clinical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NKNancy E. Kemeny
Nancy E. Kemeny
FMFidel D. Huitzil Melendez
Fidel D. Huitzil Melendez
MCMarinela Capanu
Marinela Capanu
PPPhilip B. Paty
Philip B. Paty
YFYuman Fong
Yuman Fong
MDMichael D'ANgelica
Michael D'ANgelica
Purpose: To determine the conversion to resectability in patients with unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer treated with hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) plus systemic oxaliplatin and irinotecan (CPT-11). Patients and Methods: Forty-nine patients with unresectable liver metastases (53% previously treated with chemotherapy) were enrolled onto a phase I protocol with HAI floxuridine and dexamethasone plus systemic chemotherapy with oxaliplatin and irinotecan. Results: Ninety-two percent of the 49 patients had complete (8%) or partial (84%) response, and 23 (47%) of the 49 patients were able to undergo resection in a group of patients with extensive disease (73% with > five liver lesions, 98% with bilobar disease, 86% with ≥ six segments involved). For chemotherapy-naïve and previously treated patients, the median survival from the start of HAI therapy was 50.8 and 35 months, respectively. The only baseline variable significantly associated with a higher resection rate was female sex. Variables reflecting extensive anatomic disease, such as number of lesions or number of vessels involved, were not significantly associated with the probability of resection. Conclusion: The combination of regional HAI floxuridine/dexamethasone and systemic oxaliplatin and irinotecan is an effective regimen for the treatment of patients with unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer, demonstrating a 47% conversion to resection (57% in chemotherapy-naïve patients). Future randomized trials should compare HAI plus systemic chemotherapy with systemic therapy alone to assess the additional value of HAI therapy in converting patients with hepatic metastases to resectability.

1 June 2010 in Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DGDavid J. Gallagher
David J. Gallagher
NKNancy E. Kemeny
Nancy E. Kemeny
Context: The treatment of colorectal cancer has improved considerably in recent years, but it remains the second commonest cause of cancer deaths in men and women in the United States. Better therapies have resulted in prolonged median survival for patients with metastatic disease and a select number of patients can now be cured. Evidence Acquisition: We conducted a computerized search using PubMed and Google Scholar for reports published between January 1993 and August 2009 using mesh headings and key words relating to the treatment of colorectal cancer. If reports identified by these criteria referred to other papers not in the initial search, then these were also reviewed if relevant to metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC). Results: Seven new chemotherapy agents have been licensed for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer, with associated improved median survival from 5 months to 2 years. Complete responses are rare with systemic chemotherapy alone, but higher overall response rates to systemic and intrahepatic chemotherapies have enabled initially unresectable patients to undergo potentially curative surgical resection of metastases. Improved surgical expertise together with the adjunctive use of radiofrequency ablation has further expanded the definition of resectability. Advances in the understanding of tumor biology have resulted in the development of clinically useful biomarkers and the emergence of active biological therapies. Conclusions: The multidisciplinary management of MCRC incorporating improved systemic and local therapies continues to improve median survival and enlarge the cohort of patients that can be approached with curative intent. Recent technological advances have facilitated a better understanding of tumor biology that promises continued advancements in patient care.

1 August 2005 in Journal of Clinical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NKNancy E. Kemeny
Nancy E. Kemeny
WJWilliam R. R Jarnagin
William R. R Jarnagin
PPPhilip Paty
Philip Paty
MGMithat Gönen
Mithat Gönen
LSLawrence Schwartz
Lawrence Schwartz
YFYuman Fong
Yuman Fong
Purpose: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of concurrent systemic oxaliplatin (Oxal) combinations plus hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) in patients with unresectable hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. Patients and Methods: Thirty-six patients (89% previously treated) with unresectable liver metastases were treated with concurrent HAI and systemic Oxal plus irinotecan (CPT-11; group A) or Oxal, fluorouracil (FU), and leucovorin (LV; group B). Systemic chemotherapy was administered every 2 weeks concurrent with 2 weeks of HAI floxuridine (FUDR) and dexamethasone (Dex) every 28 days. Results: The MTD for patients in group A was Oxal 100 mg/m2, CPT-11 150 mg/m2, and FUDR 0.12 mg/kg × 30 mL divided by pump flow rate. The MTD for group B was Oxal 100 mg/m2, LV 400 mg/m2, and FU 1,400 mg/m2 by continuous infusion over 48 hours, with the same FUDR dose as in group A. Grade 3 or 4 toxicities in groups A and B included diarrhea (24% and 20%), neutropenia (10% and 7%), neurotoxicity (24% and 20%), and bilirubin more than 3 mg/mL (5% and 7%, respectively). The complete and partial response rate totaled 90% for group A and 87% for group B. Median survival time was 36 and 22 months for groups A and B, respectively. Seven patients in group A were ultimately able to undergo liver resection. Conclusion: Combination therapy with HAI FUDR and Dex plus systemic Oxal combinations may be safely administered to patients with colorectal cancer. The high response rate (88%) and the possibility of conversion to resectability, despite disease progression on prior systemic regimens, suggest that these combinations should be evaluated in larger studies as first- or second-line therapy in patients with hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer.

9 December 2014 in Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RYRona Yaeger
Rona Yaeger
ECElizabeth Cowell
Elizabeth Cowell
JCJoanne F. Chou
Joanne F. Chou
AGAlexandra N. Gewirtz
Alexandra N. Gewirtz
LBLaetitia Borsu
Laetitia Borsu
NKNancy E. Kemeny
Nancy E. Kemeny
BACKGROUND: RAS and PIK3CA mutations in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) have been associated with worse survival. We sought to evaluate the impact of RAS and PIK3CA mutations on cumulative incidence of metastasis to potentially curable sites of liver and lung and other sites such as bone and brain.METHODS: We performed a computerized search of the electronic medical record of our institution for mCRC cases genotyped for RAS or PIK3CA mutations from 2008 to 2012. Cases were reviewed for patient characteristics, survival, and site‐specific metastasis.RESULTS: Among the 918 patients identified, 477 cases were RAS wild type, and 441 cases had a RAS mutation (394 at KRAS exon 2, 29 at KRAS exon 3 or 4, and 18 in NRAS). RAS mutation was significantly associated with shorter median overall survival (OS) and on multivariate analysis independently predicted worse OS (HR, 1.6; P < .01). RAS mutant mCRC exhibited a significantly higher cumulative incidence of lung, bone, and brain metastasis and on multivariate analysis was an independent predictor of involvement of these sites (HR, 1.5, 1.6, and 3.7, respectively). PIK3CA mutations occurred in 10% of the 786 cases genotyped, did not predict for worse survival, and did not exhibit a site‐specific pattern of metastatic spread.CONCLUSIONS: The metastatic potential of CRC varies with the presence of RAS mutation. RAS mutation is associated with worse OS and increased incidence of lung, bone, and brain metastasis. An understanding of this site‐specific pattern of spread may help to inform physicians' assessment of symptoms in patients with mCRC. Cancer 2015;121:1195–1203. © 2014 American Cancer Society.

25 August 2014 in Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NKNancy E. Kemeny
Nancy E. Kemeny
JCJoanne F. Chou
Joanne F. Chou
MCMarinela Capanu
Marinela Capanu
AGAlexandra N. Gewirtz
Alexandra N. Gewirtz
ACAndrea Cercek
Andrea Cercek
MDMichael I. D'Angelica
Michael I. D'Angelica
BACKGROUND: The validity of the KRAS mutation as a predictor of recurrence‐free survival (RFS) or overall survival (OS) is unclear. The current study investigated whether the presence of the KRAS mutation decreased RFS or OS in patients with colorectal cancer who underwent liver resection.METHODS: Patients with resected colorectal liver metastases who received adjuvant hepatic arterial infusion plus systemic therapy and for whom KRAS data was available were evaluated. Correlation between KRAS and clinical factors was done using the Fisher exact test. Kaplan‐Meier methods were used to estimate the median RFS and OS.RESULTS: A total of 169 patients were evaluated, 118 of whom had KRAS wild‐type (WT) and 51 had KRAS mutated (MUT) tumors. The 3‐year RFS rate was 46% for patients with KRAS WT (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 35%‐56%) and 30% (95% CI, 16%‐44%) for patients with KRAS MUT (P =.005). The 3‐year OS rate was 95% (95% CI, 87%‐98%) and 81% (95% CI, 62%‐95%), respectively, for patients with KRAS WT and KRAS MUT (P =.07). On multivariate analysis, KRAS remained a significant predictor of RFS (hazard ratio, 1.9). The 3‐year cumulative recurrence rate by site of metastases was as follows: 2% versus 13.4% for bone (P≤.01), 2% versus 14.5% for brain (P =.05), 33.2% versus 58% for lung (P≤.01), and 30% versus 47% for liver (P =.10) in patients with KRAS WT versus KRAS MUT.CONCLUSIONS: In the current study, among patients with resected colorectal liver metastases who were treated with adjuvant hepatic arterial infusion plus systemic therapy, patients with KRAS MUT were found to have a significantly worse 3‐year RFS (30%) compared with KRAS WT (46%) p=.005. The cumulative incidence of bone, brain, and lung metastases was significantly higher for patients with KRAS MUT compared with those with KRAS WT. Cancer 2014;120:3965–3971. © 2014 American Cancer Society.