Jagmeet Singh, MD

Dr. Jagmeet Singh, MD

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
23 April 2021 in Clinical and Experimental Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JMJagmeet Singh, MD
Jagmeet Singh, MD
PMPreeti Malik
Preeti Malik
NPNidhi Patel
Nidhi Patel
SPSuveenkrishna Pothuru
Suveenkrishna Pothuru
AIAvantika Israni
Avantika Israni
AKAsim Kichloo
Asim Kichloo

9 June 2021 in Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SSShantanu Solanki
Shantanu Solanki
AKAsim Kichloo
Asim Kichloo
DDDushyant S. Dahiya
Dushyant S. Dahiya
DSDhanshree Mha Solanki
Dhanshree Mha Solanki
JMJagmeet Singh, MD
Jagmeet Singh, MD
TZTobias Zuchelli
Tobias Zuchelli
Goals: We aimed to assess outcomes of patients with liver cirrhosis who underwent therapeutic or diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) to determine whether these patients had different outcomes relative to patients without cirrhosis. Background: ERCP is an important procedure for treatment of biliary and pancreatic disease. However, ERCP is relatively technically difficult to perform when compared with procedures such as esophagogastroduodenoscopy or colonoscopy. Little is known about how ERCP use affects patients with liver cirrhosis. Study: Using patient records from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database, we identified adult patients who underwent ERCP between 2009 and 2014 using International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision coding and stratified data into 2 groups: patients with liver cirrhosis and those without liver cirrhosis. We compared baseline characteristics and multiple outcomes between groups and compared outcomes of diagnostic versus therapeutic ERCP in patients with cirrhosis. A multivariate regression model was used to estimate the association of cirrhosis with ERCP outcomes. Results: A total of 1,038,258 hospitalizations of patients who underwent ERCP between 2009 and 2014 were identified, of which 31,294 had cirrhosis and 994,681 did not have cirrhosis. Of the patients with cirrhosis, 21,835 (69.8%) received therapeutic ERCP and 9459 (30.2%) received diagnostic ERCP. Patients with cirrhosis had more ERCP-associated hemorrhages (2.5% vs. 1.2%; P<0.0001) compared with noncirrhosis patients but had lower incidence of perforations (0.1% vs. 0.2%; P<0.0001) and post-ERCP pancreatitis (8.6% vs. 7%; P<0.0001). Cholecystitis was the same between groups (2.3% vs. 2.3%; P<0.0001). In patients with cirrhosis, those who received therapeutic ERCP had higher post-ERCP pancreatitis (7.9% vs. 5.1%; P<0.0001) and ERCP-associated hemorrhage (2.7% vs. 2.1%; P<0.0001) but lower incidences of perforation and cholecystitis (0.1% vs. 0.3%; P<0.0001) and cholecystitis (1.9 vs. 3.1%; P<0.0001) compared with those who received diagnostic ERCP. Conclusions: Use of therapeutic ERCP in patients with liver cirrhosis may lead to higher risk of complications such as pancreatitis and postprocedure hemorrhage, whereas diagnostic ERCP may increase the risk of pancreatitis and cholecystitis in patients with cirrhosis. Comorbidities in cirrhosis patients may increase the risk of post-ERCP complications and mortality; therefore, use of ERCP in cirrhosis patients should be carefully considered, and further studies on this patient population are needed.

13 July 2020 in Cureus
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RCRaja Chandra Chakinala
Raja Chandra Chakinala
SSShantanu Solanki
Shantanu Solanki
JMJagmeet Singh, MD
Jagmeet Singh, MD
HSHarshil Shah
Harshil Shah
DSDhanshree Solanki
Dhanshree Solanki
CNChristopher Nabors
Christopher Nabors
Background Dieulafoy's lesion is a relatively rare, but potentially life-threatening, condition where a tortuous arteriole, most commonly in the stomach, may bleed and lead to significant gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Limited epidemiological data exist on patient characteristics and the annual number of hospitalizations associated with such lesions. The aim of our study is to determine the inpatient burden of Dieulafoy's lesion. Methods We analyzed the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database for all subjects with a discharge diagnosis of Dieulafoy's lesion of the stomach, duodenum, and colon using International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes 537.84 and 569.86 as the primary or secondary diagnosis during the period from 2002 to 2011. Statistical significance of variation in the number of hospital discharges and demographics during the study period was achieved using the Cochrane-Armitage trend test. Results In 2002, there were 1,071 admissions with a discharge diagnosis of Dieulafoy's lesion as compared to 7,414 in 2011 (p < 0.0001). Dieulafoy's lesion was found to be most common in the age group of 65-79 years (p < 0.0001). Overall, it was found to be more common in males as compared to females (p = 0.0261). The white race was most commonly affected amongst all the races. The average cost of care per hospitalization increased from $14,992 in 2002 to $25,594 in 2011 (p < 0.0001). Conclusion There has been a steady rise in the number of inpatient admissions with Dieulafoy's lesions. Advances in diagnostic techniques likely play a key role in the higher detection rates along with the possible involvement of other unknown factors. Men, in the age group of 65 to 79 years, and Whites were found to have significantly higher admission rates than all other groups, with a significant increase in the cost of care.

18 February 2021 in Cureus
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RCRaja Chandra Chakinala
Raja Chandra Chakinala
CSChail Shah
Chail Shah
JRJigisha Rakholiya
Jigisha Rakholiya
MMMehwish Martin
Mehwish Martin
NKNirmaljot Kaur
Nirmaljot Kaur
Urvish PatelUrvish Patel
Urvish Patel
Introduction: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has multiorgan involvement and its severity varies with the presence of pre-existing risk factors like cardiovascular disease (CVD) and hypertension (HTN). Therefore, it is important to evaluate their effect on outcomes of COVID-19 patients. The objective of this meta-analysis and meta-regression is to evaluate outcomes of COVID-19 amongst patients with CVD and HTN. Methods: English full-text observational studies having data on epidemiological characteristics of patients with COVID-19 were identified searching PubMed from December 1, 2019, to July 31, 2020, following Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) protocol. Studies having pre-existing CVD and HTN data that described outcomes including mortality and invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) utilization were selected. Using random-effects models, risk of composite poor outcomes (meta-analysis) and isolated mortality and IMV utilization (meta-regression) were evaluated. Pooled prevalence of CVD and HTN, correlation coefficient (r) and odds ratio (OR) were estimated. The forest plots and correlation plots were created using random-effects models. Results: Out of 29 studies (n=27,950) that met the criteria, 28 and 27 studies had data on CVD and HTN, respectively. Pooled prevalence of CVD was 18.2% and HTN was 32.7%. In meta-analysis, CVD (OR: 3.36; 95% CI: 2.29-4.94) and HTN (OR: 1.94; 95% CI: 1.57-2.40) were associated with composite poor outcome. In age-adjusted meta-regression, pre-existing CVD was having significantly higher correlation of IMV utilization (r: 0.28; OR: 1.3; 95% CI: 1.1-1.6) without having any association with mortality (r: -0.01; OR: 0.9; 95% CI: 0.9-1.1) among COVID-19 hospitalizations. HTN was neither correlated with higher IMV utilization (r: 0.01; OR: 1.0; 95% CI: 0.9-1.1) nor correlated with higher mortality (r: 0.001; OR: 1.0; 95% CI: 0.9-1.1). Conclusion: In age-adjusted analysis, though we identified pre-existing CVD as a risk factor for higher utilization of mechanical ventilation, pre-existing CVD and HTN had no independent role in increasing mortality.

30 June 2020 in Cureus
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HSHarshil Shah
Harshil Shah
UMUvesh Mansuri
Uvesh Mansuri
SPSukrut Pagad
Sukrut Pagad
RAReshmi Adupa
Reshmi Adupa
JMJagmeet Singh, MD
Jagmeet Singh, MD
SSShantanu Solanki
Shantanu Solanki
The 30-day readmission rates are being used as a quality measure by Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for specific medical and surgical conditions. Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is one of the important causes of morbidity and mortality in the United States (US). The characteristics and predictors of 30-day readmission in ARDS patients in the US are not widely known, which we have depicted in our study. The aim of this study is to identify 30-day readmission rates, characteristics, and predictors of ARDS patients using the largest publicly available nationwide database. We used the National Readmission Database from the year 2013 to extract the patients with ARDS by primary discharge diagnosis with ICD9-CM codes. All-cause unplanned 30-day readmission rates were calculated for patients admitted between January and November 2013. The independent predictors for unplanned 30-day readmission were identified by survey logistic regression. After excluding elective readmission, the all-cause unplanned 30-day readmission rate for ARDS patients was 18%. Index admissions readmitted within 30-day had a significantly higher baseline burden of comorbidities with a Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) ≥1 as compared to those who were not readmitted within 30 days. In multivariate regression analysis, several predictors associated with 30-day readmission were self-pay/no charge/other (OR 1.19, 95%CI: 1.02-1.38; p = 0.02), higher-income class (OR 0.86, 95%CI:0.79-0.99; p = 0.03), private insurance (OR 0.81, 95%CI:0.67-0.94; p = 0.01), and teaching metropolitan hospital (OR 0.72, 95%CI:0.61-0.94; p = 0.01). The unplanned 30-day readmission rates are higher in ARDS patients in the US. Several modifiable factors such as insurance, socioeconomic status, and hospital type are associated with 30-day readmission among ARDS patients.

1 December 2020 in Cureus
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MJMohammad Jamil
Mohammad Jamil
AKAsim Kichloo
Asim Kichloo
RSRonak G. Soni
Ronak G. Soni
SJShakeel Jamal
Shakeel Jamal
MKMuhammad Zatmar Khan
Muhammad Zatmar Khan
KKKhalil Kanjwal
Khalil Kanjwal
Cirrhosis is known to be an important prognostic factor in determining morbidity and mortality in preoperative cardiac risk assessment for cardiac surgery. Data is limited on outcomes in patients with infective endocarditis (IE) and comorbid liver cirrhosis. The objective of our study is to evaluate the clinical outcomes in patients suffering from IE both with and without underlying liver cirrhosis as well as to determine rates of in-hospital mortality and factors that contribute to this outcome. Liver cirrhosis worsens clinical outcomes in patients with IE. Patients with a principal diagnosis of IE with and without liver cirrhosis were identified by querying the Healthcare Cost and Utilization (HCUP) database, specifically the National Inpatient Sample for the years 2013 and 2014 using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes. During 2013 and 2014, a total of 17,952 patients were admitted with a diagnosis of IE, out of whom 780 had concurrent liver cirrhosis. There was increased in-hospital mortality [15.6% vs 10.2%, aOR = 1.57 (1.27-1.93)], acute kidney injury [41.4% vs 32.6%, aOR = 1.45 (1.24-1.69)], and hematologic complications [32.1 vs 14.7%, aOR = 2.87 (2.44-3.37)] in patients with IE with liver cirrhosis when compared to patients with IE without liver cirrhosis. Patients having IE without liver cirrhosis underwent an increased number of interventions, i.e. aortic (7.2 vs 3.7%, aOR = 0.51 (0.34-0.76)) and mitral (4.9% vs 3.4%, aOR = 0.39 (0.23-0.69)) valvular replacements as compared to those with liver cirrhosis, which may explain the increased mortality seen in patients with liver cirrhosis. Liver cirrhosis is an important prognostic risk factor for in-hospital mortality in patients with IE. The coagulopathic state in addition to increased rates of bleeding complications and renal dysfunction make these patients poor surgical candidates thus contributing to higher mortality. Further research into the individual risk factors contributing to the increased mortality rates in patients with IE and cirrhosis is required.