Advance care planning initiatives are being implemented across healthcare systems around the world, but how best to evaluate their implementation is unknown. To identify gaps and/or redundancies in current evaluative strategies to help healthcare systems develop future evaluative frameworks for ACP. Systematic review. Peer-reviewed and gray literature searches were conducted till February 2015 to answer: “What methods have healthcare systems used to evaluate implementation of advance care planning initiatives?” A PICOS framework was developed to identify articles describing the implementation and evaluation of a health system–level advance care planning initiative. Outcome measures were mapped onto a conceptual quality indicator framework based on the Institute of Medicine and Donabedian models of healthcare quality. A total of 46 studies met inclusion criteria for analysis. Most articles reported on single parts of a healthcare system (e.g. continuing care). The most common outcome measures pertained to document completion, followed by healthcare resource use. Patient-, family-, or healthcare provider-reported outcomes were less commonly measured. Concordance measures (e.g. dying in place of choice) were reported by only 26% of studies. The conceptual quality indicator framework identified gaps and redundancies in measurement and is presented as a potential foundation from which to develop a comprehensive advance care planning evaluation framework. Document completion is frequently used to evaluate advance care planning program implementation; capturing the quality of care appears to be more difficult. This systematic review provides health system administrators with a comprehensive summary of measures used to evaluate advance care planning and may identify gaps in evaluation within their local context.

In 2014, Alberta, Canada broke new ground in having the first provincial healthcare policy and procedure for advance care planning (ACP), the process of communicating and documenting a person’s future healthcare preferences. However, to date public participation and awareness of ACP remains limited. The aim of this initiative was to elicit community group perspectives on how to help people learn about and participate in ACP. Targeted invitations were sent to over 300 community groups in Alberta (e.g. health/disease, seniors/retirement, social/service, legal, faith-based, funeral planning, financial, and others). Sixty-seven participants from 47 community groups attended a “World Café”. Participants moved between tables at fixed time intervals, and in small groups discussed three separate ACP-related questions. Written comments were captured by participants and facilitators. Each comment was coded according to Michie et al.’s Theoretical Domains Framework, and mapped to the Capability, Opportunity and Motivation behavior change system (COM-B) in order to identify candidate intervention strategies. Of 800 written comments, 76% mapped to the Opportunity: Physical COM-B component of behavior, reflecting a need for access to ACP resources. The most common intervention functions identified pertained to Education, Environmental Restructuring, Training, and Enablement. We synthesized the intervention functions and qualitative comments into eight recommendations for engaging people in ACP. These pertain to access to informational resources, group education and facilitation, health system processes, use of stories, marketing, integration into life events, inclusion of business partners, and harmonization of terminology. There was broad support for the role of community groups in promoting ACP. Eight recommendations for engaging the public in ACP were generated and have been shared with stakeholders.

Background: Advance care planning (ACP) is a process of reflection on and communication of a person's future health‐care preferences. Evidence suggests visible minorities engage less in ACP. The South Asian ethnic group is the largest visible minority group in Canada, and information is needed to understand how ACP is perceived and how best to approach ACP within this diverse community.Objective: To explore perspectives of South Asian community members towards ACP.Design: Peer‐to‐peer inquiry. South Asian community members who graduated from the Patient and Community Engagement Research programme (PaCER) at the University of Calgary utilized the PaCER method (SET, COLLECT and REFLECT) to conduct a focus group, family interviews and a community forum.Setting and participants: Fifty‐seven community‐dwelling men and women (22‐86 years) who self‐identified with the South Asian community in Calgary, Alberta, Canada.Results: The concept of ACP was mostly foreign to this community and was often associated with other end‐of‐life issues such as organ donation and estate planning. Cultural aspects (e.g. trust in shared family decision making and taboos related to discussing death), religious beliefs (e.g. fatalism) and immigration challenges (e.g. essential priorities) emerged as barriers to participation in ACP. However, participants were eager to learn about ACP and recommended several engagement strategies (e.g. disseminate information through religious institutions and community centres, include families in ACP discussions, encourage family physicians to initiate discussions and translate materials).Conclusions: Use of a patient engagement research model proved highly successful in understanding South Asian community members' participation in ACP.

The Serious Illness Care Program (SICP), designed by Ariadne Labs, is a multicomponent intervention to improve conversations about values and goals for patients with a life-limiting illness. In oncology, implementation of the SICP achieved more, earlier, and better-quality conversations and reduced anxiety and depression among patients with advanced cancer. In this commentary, we describe the SICP, including results from the cluster-randomized trial, provide examples of real-world implementation of this program, and highlight ongoing challenges and barriers that are preventing widespread adoption of this intervention into routine practice. For the SICP to be successfully embedded into routine patient care, it will require significant effort, including ongoing leadership support and training opportunities, champions from all sectors of the interdisciplinary team, and adaptation of the program to a wider range of patients. Future research should also investigate how early conversations can be translated into personalized care plans for patients.

Advance care planning (ACP) involves reflection on health care preferences and communication of the person’s wishes in case of future incapacity. ACP is particularly pertinent in supportive living (SL) as residents are at high risk of cognitive decline and changes in health status, but the readiness of residents, families, and health care practitioners to engage in ACP discussions is not known. The purpose of this study was to explore the readiness among these stakeholders and the factors that influence the degree of readiness. Twenty-seven participants (10 residents, 8 family members, 9 health care practitioners) affiliated with 4 SL facilities in Calgary, AB, Canada took part in semistructured, one-on-one interviews. An interpretive descriptive approach was utilized to generate clinically relevant findings. Variability in the conceptualization of ACP, including confusion regarding terminology, emerged as a major theme. Themes that influenced readiness for engagement in ACP discussions included the influence of prior experience for residents and family members, perception of treatment goals, and understanding of roles in the process between the groups. Recommendations for clinicians include clarifying ACP concepts for themselves and residents, shifting focus toward an elucidation of values and preferences rather than on documentation, greater clarity about the roles of the various stakeholders, and recognizing the importance of prior experience for residents and family members. These findings can be used to contribute to the understanding of ACP engagement in SL and inform an approach to engaging in meaningful discussions about ACP.

To prospectively determine which diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) imaging technique (ie, conventional diffusion-weighted MR imaging [b = 1000 or 1500 sec/mm2] or fluid-inversion prepared diffusion [FLIPD] MR imaging [b = 1500 sec/mm2]) is most accurate in depicting acute ischemic stroke at 3 T. The Health Research Ethics Board approved this study; written informed consent was provided by all participants or their surrogate. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging was performed in 75 consecutive patients (43 men, 32 women; mean age, 64.0 years) with acute ischemic stroke. Two experienced neuroradiologists determined the presence of hyperacute stroke lesions at diffusion-weighted MR imaging by locating areas of hyperintensity that corresponded to regions with a decreased diffusion coefficient. These findings were used as the reference standard. Four raters who were blinded to patient history assessed all images and apparent diffusion coefficient maps for the presence of changes that were consistent with acute ischemic stroke. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value, and inter- and intrarater reliability scores were calculated for each technique. Specificity, positive predictive value, and accuracy were not significantly different among the techniques. FLIPD MR images obtained with a b value of 1500 sec/mm2 had decreased sensitivity for acute ischemic stroke (mean, 61.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 55.4%, 67.9%) compared with conventional diffusion-weighted MR images obtained with a b value of either 1000 sec/mm2 (mean, 82.5%; 95% CI: 77.1%, 87.0%) or 1500 sec/mm2 (mean, 84.5%; 95% CI: 79.3%, 88.9%). FLIPD MR images also had decreased negative predictive value (mean, 96.5%; 95% CI: 95.7%, 97.2%) compared with conventional diffusion-weighted MR images obtained with a b value of either 1000 sec/mm2 (mean, 98.4%; 95% CI: 97.8%, 98.8%) or 1500 sec/mm2 (mean, 98.6%; 95% CI: 98.1%, 99.0%). Intra- and interrater reliability scores were generally excellent for all three techniques. FLIPD MR images obtained with a b value of 1500 sec/mm2 are less suitable for the detection of acute ischemic stroke owing to a decreased sensitivity and negative predictive value. The performance of the two conventional diffusion-weighted MR imaging techniques (b = 1000 and 1500 sec/mm2) was equivalent.