Mauro Iori

Dr. Mauro Iori

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
17 October 2006 in Medical Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AEAnn Van Esch
Ann Van Esch
LTLaura Tillikainen
Laura Tillikainen
JPJukka Pyykkonen
Jukka Pyykkonen
MTMikko Tenhunen
Mikko Tenhunen
HHHannu Helminen
Hannu Helminen
DHDominique P. Huyskens
Dominique P. Huyskens

SFStefania Fugazzaro
Stefania Fugazzaro
ACAngela Contri
Angela Contri
OEOtmen Esseroukh
Otmen Esseroukh
Shaniko KaleciShaniko Kaleci
Shaniko Kaleci
Stefania CrociStefania Croci
Stefania Croci
stefania costistefania costi
stefania costi
Increasing numbers of individuals suffer from post-acute COVID-19 syndrome (PACS), which manifests with persistent symptoms, the most prevalent being dyspnea, fatigue, and musculoskeletal, cognitive, and/or mental health impairments. This systematic review investigated the effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions for individuals with PACS. We searched the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, CINHAL, Scopus, Prospero, and PEDro databases and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to November 2021. We screened 516 citations for eligibility, i.e., trials that included individuals with PACS exposed to exercise-based rehabilitation interventions. Five RCTs were included, accounting for 512 participants (aged 49.2–69.4 years, 65% males). Based on the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (RoB 2.0), two RCTs had “low risk of bias”, and three were in the “some concerns” category. Three RCTs compared experimental rehabilitation interventions with no or minimal rehabilitation, while two compared two active rehabilitation interventions. Rehabilitation seemed to improve dyspnea, anxiety, and kinesiophobia. Results on pulmonary function were inconsistent, while improvements were detected in muscle strength, walking capacity, sit-to-stand performance, and quality of life. Pending further studies based on qualitatively sound designs, these first findings seem to advocate for rehabilitation interventions to lessen disability due to PACS.

1 October 2002 in Radiotherapy and Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AEAnn Van Esch
Ann Van Esch
JBJörg Bohsung
Jörg Bohsung
PSPekka Sorvari
Pekka Sorvari
MTMikko Tenhunen
Mikko Tenhunen
MPMarta Paiusco
Marta Paiusco
DHDominique Pierre Huyskens
Dominique Pierre Huyskens

17 September 2007 in Medical Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AEAnn Van Esch
Ann Van Esch
CCChristian Clermont
Christian Clermont
MDMagali Devillers
Magali Devillers
MIMauro Iori
Mauro Iori
DHDominique P. Huyskens
Dominique P. Huyskens

20 June 2013 in BioMed Research International
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FGF. Guerriero
F. Guerriero
MFM. E. Ferrari
M. E. Ferrari
FBF. Botta
F. Botta
FFF. Fioroni
F. Fioroni
EGE. Grassi
E. Grassi
MCM. Cremonesi
M. Cremonesi
Kidney dosimetry in177Lu and90Y PRRT requires 3 to 6 whole-body/SPECT scans to extrapolate the peptide kinetics, and it is considered time and resource consuming. We investigated the most adequate timing for imaging and time-activity interpolating curve, as well as the performance of a simplified dosimetry, by means of just 1-2 scans. Finally the influence of risk factors and of the peptide (DOTATOC versus DOTATATE) is considered. 28 patients treated at first cycle with177Lu DOTATATE and 30 with177Lu DOTATOC underwent SPECT scans at 2 and 6 hours, 1, 2, and 3 days after the radiopharmaceutical injection. Dose was calculated with our simplified method, as well as the ones most used in the clinic, that is, trapezoids, monoexponential, and biexponential functions. The same was done skipping the 6 h and the 3 d points. We found that data should be collected until 100 h for177Lu therapy and 70 h for90Y therapy, otherwise the dose calculation is strongly influenced by the curve interpolating the data and should be carefully chosen. Risk factors (hypertension, diabetes) cause a rather statistically significant 20% increase in dose (t-test,P<0.10), with DOTATATE affecting an increase of 25% compared to DOTATOC (t-test,P<0.05).

1 April 2017 in Physica Medica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ECElisabetta Cagni
Elisabetta Cagni
ABAndrea Botti
Andrea Botti
RMRenato Micera
Renato Micera
MGMaria Galeandro
Maria Galeandro
RSRoberto Sghedoni
Roberto Sghedoni
MIMauro Iori
Mauro Iori