Amber Pearson

Dr. Amber Pearson

Department of Geography, Environment and Spatial Science, College of Social Science, Michigan State University,East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2016 in Health & Place
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DNDaniel Nutsford
Daniel Nutsford
Amber PearsonAmber Pearson
Amber Pearson
SKSimon Kingham
Simon Kingham
FRFemke Reitsma
Femke Reitsma

22 March 2021 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RBRachel T. Buxton
Rachel T. Buxton
Amber PearsonAmber Pearson
Amber Pearson
CAClaudia Allou
Claudia Allou
KFKurt Fristrup
Kurt Fristrup
GWGeorge Wittemyer
George Wittemyer
Parks are important places to listen to natural sounds and avoid human-related noise, an increasingly rare combination. We first explore whether and to what degree natural sounds influence health outcomes using a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. We identified 36 publications examining the health benefits of natural sound. Meta-analyses of 18 of these publications revealed aggregate evidence for decreased stress and annoyance (g = −0.60, 95% CI = −0.97, −0.23) and improved health and positive affective outcomes (g = 1.63, 95% CI = 0.09, 3.16). Examples of beneficial outcomes include decreased pain, lower stress, improved mood, and enhanced cognitive performance. Given this evidence, and to facilitate incorporating public health in US national park soundscape management, we then examined the distribution of natural sounds in relation to anthropogenic sound at 221 sites across 68 parks. National park soundscapes with little anthropogenic sound and abundant natural sounds occurred at 11.3% of the sites. Parks with high visitation and urban park sites had more anthropogenic sound, yet natural sounds associated with health benefits also were frequent. These included animal sounds (audible for a mean of 59.3% of the time, SD: 23.8) and sounds from wind and water (mean: 19.2%, SD: 14.8). Urban and other parks that are extensively visited offer important opportunities to experience natural sounds and are significant targets for soundscape conservation to bolster health for visitors. Our results assert that natural sounds provide important ecosystem services, and parks can bolster public health by highlighting and conserving natural soundscapes. Significance This study examines evidence of the health benefits of natural soundscapes and quantifies the prevalence of restorative acoustic environments in national parks across the United States. The results affirm that natural sounds improve health, increase positive affect, and lower stress and annoyance. Also, analyses reveal many national park sites with a high abundance of natural sound and low anthropogenic sound. Raising awareness of natural soundscapes at national parks provides opportunities to enhance visitor health outcomes. Despite more abundant anthropogenic sound, urban and frequently visited sites offered exposure to natural sounds associated with health benefits, making them a valuable target for soundscape mitigation. Our analysis can inform spatial planning that focuses on managing natural soundscapes to enhance human health and experiences.

1 May 2020 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JSJustin Stoler
Justin Stoler
Amber PearsonAmber Pearson
Amber Pearson
CSChad Staddon
Chad Staddon
AWAmber Wutich
Amber Wutich
Elizabeth MackElizabeth Mack
Elizabeth Mack
HZHassan Zinab
Hassan Zinab

8 October 2017 in International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LSLouise Signal
Louise Signal
JSJames Stanley
James Stanley
MSMoira Smith
Moira Smith
MBM. B. Barr
M. B. Barr
TCTim Chambers
Tim Chambers
Cliona Ni MhurchuCliona Ni Mhurchu
Cliona Ni Mhurchu
Over the past three decades the global prevalence of childhood overweight and obesity has increased by 47%. Marketing of energy-dense nutrient-poor foods and beverages contributes to this worldwide increase. Previous research on food marketing to children largely uses self-report, reporting by parents, or third-party observation of children’s environments, with the focus mostly on single settings and/or media. This paper reports on innovative research, Kids’Cam, in which children wore cameras to examine the frequency and nature of everyday exposure to food marketing across multiple media and settings. Kids’Cam was a cross-sectional study of 168 children (mean age 12.6 years, SD = 0.5) in Wellington, New Zealand. Each child wore a wearable camera on four consecutive days, capturing images automatically every seven seconds. Images were manually coded as either recommended (core) or not recommended (non-core) to be marketed to children by setting, marketing medium, and product category. Images in convenience stores and supermarkets were excluded as marketing examples were considered too numerous to count. On average, children were exposed to non-core food marketing 27.3 times a day (95% CI 24.8, 30.1) across all settings. This was more than twice their average exposure to core food marketing (12.3 per day, 95% CI 8.7, 17.4). Most non-core exposures occurred at home (33%), in public spaces (30%) and at school (19%). Food packaging was the predominant marketing medium (74% and 64% for core and non-core foods) followed by signs (21% and 28% for core and non-core). Sugary drinks, fast food, confectionary and snack foods were the most commonly encountered non-core foods marketed. Rates were calculated using Poisson regression. Children in this study were frequently exposed, across multiple settings, to marketing of non-core foods not recommended to be marketed to children. The study provides further evidence of the need for urgent action to reduce children’s exposure to marketing of unhealthy foods, and suggests the settings and media in which to act. Such action is necessary if the Commission on Ending Childhood Obesity’s vision is to be achieved.

1 May 2021 in International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JSJustin Stoler
Justin Stoler
JMJoshua Miller
Joshua Miller
ABAlexandra Brewis
Alexandra Brewis
Matthew FreemanMatthew Freeman
Matthew Freeman
Leila M. HarrisLeila M. Harris
Leila M. Harris
RTRaymond Tutu
Raymond Tutu

30 August 2019 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Amber PearsonAmber Pearson
Amber Pearson
ASAshton Shortridge
Ashton Shortridge
PDPaul L Delamater
Paul L Delamater
THTeresa Horton
Teresa Horton
KDKyla Dahlin
Kyla Dahlin
MMMichael J Marchiori
Michael J Marchiori
Research linking green space and mental health abounds. It also appears that oceanic blue spaces may be salutogenic, benefitting mental health through their expansive viewscapes, and possibly auditory and olfactory stimuli. Yet, it is unknown whether the same is true for freshwater bodies. In this ecological study, we explored associations between hospitalizations for anxiety/mood disorder in Michigan (>30,000) and proximity to the North American Great Lakes. As a sensitivity analysis, we examined associations for 15 different inland lake sizes. Results showed small, protective effects for distance to Great Lake (β = 0.06, p<0.001) and percentage of inland lakes (β = -0.04, p = 0.004). Unexpectedly, shorter distance to nearest inland lake was associated with higher anxiety/mood disorder hospitalizations. The protective effects of percentage area covered by inland lakes was observed for all lake sizes. These initial findings provide a foundation for future individual-level research with finer measurement of health outcomes and blue space exposure.