Significance: For the 2m DNA to fit into the tiny cell nucleus, it is wrapped around nucleosomes and folded into loops clustering together in domains. Genome function depends on this 3D-organization, especially on-going dynamic processes like transcription. Techniques studying the network of DNA contacts genome-wide have recently revealed this 3D architecture, but the protein factors behind this are not understood. We study two proteins that are known to help form DNA loops: cohesin and CTCC-binding factor (CTCF). Respective depletion and analysis of DNA contacts genome-wide show that CTCF is required to separate neighboring folding domains and keep cohesin in place, whereas cohesin is important for shaping the domains. Consistently, we observe different changes of gene expression.

In response to DNA damage, tissue homoeostasis is ensured by protein networks promoting DNA repair, cell cycle arrest or apoptosis. DNA damage response signalling pathways coordinate these processes, partly by propagating gene-expression-modulating signals. DNA damage influences not only the abundance of messenger RNAs, but also their coding information through alternative splicing. Here we show that transcription-blocking DNA lesions promote chromatin displacement of late-stage spliceosomes and initiate a positive feedback loop centred on the signalling kinase ATM. We propose that initial spliceosome displacement and subsequent R-loop formation is triggered by pausing of RNA polymerase at DNA lesions. In turn, R-loops activate ATM, which signals to impede spliceosome organization further and augment ultraviolet-irradiation-triggered alternative splicing at the genome-wide level. Our findings define R-loop-dependent ATM activation by transcription-blocking lesions as an important event in the DNA damage response of non-replicating cells, and highlight a key role for spliceosome displacement in this process.

Regulatory DNA elements such as enhancers, silencers and insulators are embedded in metazoan genomes, and they control gene expression during development. Although they fulfil different roles, they share specific properties. Herein we discuss some examples and a parsimonious model for their function is proposed. All are transcription units that tether their target promoters close to, or distant from, transcriptional hot spots (or 'factories').