Lukas Haferkamp

Mr. Lukas Haferkamp

ETH Zuerich, Switzerland
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 March 2021 in Metals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Lukas HaferkampLukas Haferkamp
Lukas Haferkamp
LHLivia Haudenschild
Livia Haudenschild
ASAdriaan Bernardus Spierings
Adriaan Bernardus Spierings
KWKonrad Wegener
Konrad Wegener
KRKirstin Riener
Kirstin Riener
GLGerhard Johannes Leichtfried
Gerhard Johannes Leichtfried
The particle shape influences the part properties in laser powder bed fusion, and powder flowability and powder layer density (PLD) are considered the link between the powder and part properties. Therefore, this study investigates the relationship between these properties and their influence on final part density for six 1.4404 (316L) powders and eight AlSi10Mg powders. The results show a correlation of the powder properties with a Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) of −0.89 for the PLD and the Hausner ratio, a PCC of −0.67 for the Hausner ratio and circularity, and a PCC of 0.72 for circularity and PLD. Furthermore, the results show that beyond a threshold, improvement of circularity, PLD, or Hausner ratio have no positive influence on the final part density. While the water-atomized, least-spherical powder yielded parts with high porosity, no improvement of part density was achieved by feedstock with higher circularities than gas-atomized powder.

15 October 2020 in Progress in Additive Manufacturing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Lukas HaferkampLukas Haferkamp
Lukas Haferkamp
ASAdriaan Spierings
Adriaan Spierings
MRMarco Rusch
Marco Rusch
DJDominik Jermann
Dominik Jermann
MSMarvin A. Spurek
Marvin A. Spurek
KWKonrad Wegener
Konrad Wegener
Powder layer density is an important measure for understanding the effect of powder on part quality in powder bed fusion. The density of thin layers, as they are deposited in powder bed fusion, differs from the density of powder in large containers. This study investigates this difference. Therefore, six monomodal powders with different particle size distributions, from coarse to fine, are spread in an 84.5 µm deep cavity to determine their powder layer densities for a single layer. A linear dependence of powder layer density on the D50 of powder is discovered for monomodal powders with good flowability. This dependence can be explained by the wall effect. Fine powders with low flowability show an increase in the standard deviation of the powder layer density. These findings suggest the existence of a particle size distribution that is sufficiently small to minimize the wall effect in a thin layer while still being sufficiently large to guarantee a good flowability of the powder.

17 April 2021 in Progress in Additive Manufacturing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Lukas HaferkampLukas Haferkamp
Lukas Haferkamp
SLSimon Liechti
Simon Liechti
ASAdriaan Spierings
Adriaan Spierings
KWKonrad Wegener
Konrad Wegener
The final part density in laser powder bed fusion is influenced by the powder particle size distribution. Too fine powders are not spreadable, and too coarse powders cause porosity. Powder blends, especially bimodal ones, can exhibit higher packing densities and changes in flowability compared to their monomodal constituents. These properties can influence final part density. Therefore, the influence of bimodal powder on final part density was investigated. Two gas atomized 316L (1.4404) powders with a D50 of 20.3 µm and 60.3 µm were blended at weight ratios of 3:1, 1:1, and 1:3, and the original and blended powders were processed. The results show that the final part porosity increases almost linearly with an increasing volume fraction of coarse powder. Furthermore, the final part density is independent of powder bulk density and flowability. Measurements of the top surface show that an increase of part porosity by coarse powder is caused by an increase in melt pool fluctuation, which in turn causes irregular solidified scan tracks. Additionally, the results show that the powder segregation during coating is stronger for the bimodal powder; however, no influence of the segregation on the part density could be found.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Lukas HaferkampLukas Haferkamp
Lukas Haferkamp
ASAdriaan Spierings
Adriaan Spierings
MRMarco Rusch
Marco Rusch
DJDominik Jermann
Dominik Jermann
MSMarvin A. Spurek
Marvin A. Spurek
KWKonrad Wegener
Konrad Wegener
Progress in Additive Manufacturing