Susana Faria

Dr. Susana Faria

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
7 May 2009 in Small
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Albino MartinsAlbino Martins
Albino Martins
EPElisabete D. Pinho
Elisabete D. Pinho
Susana FariaSusana Faria
Susana Faria
Iva PashkulevaIva Pashkuleva
Iva Pashkuleva
Alexandra P. MarquesAlexandra P. Marques
Alexandra P. Marques
Nuno M. NevesNuno M. Neves
Nuno M. Neves

1 March 2016 in Materials Science and Engineering: A
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GMG. Miranda
G. Miranda
Susana FariaSusana Faria
Susana Faria
Flavio BartolomeuFlavio Bartolomeu
Flavio Bartolomeu
EPE. Pinto
E. Pinto
SMSara Madeira
Sara Madeira
ÓCÓscar Samuel Novais Carvalho
Óscar Samuel Novais Carvalho

1 August 2010 in Biomaterials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Albino MartinsAlbino Martins
Albino Martins
ADAna Rita C. Duarte
Ana Rita C. Duarte
Susana FariaSusana Faria
Susana Faria
Alexandra P. MarquesAlexandra P. Marques
Alexandra P. Marques
RRRui M. Reis
Rui M. Reis
Nuno M. NevesNuno M. Neves
Nuno M. Neves

24 November 2010 in Biomacromolecules
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Marta Alves da SilvaMarta Alves da Silva
Marta Alves da Silva
Albino MartinsAlbino Martins
Albino Martins
Ana Rita Costa-PintoAna Rita Costa-Pinto
Ana Rita Costa-Pinto
Pedro CostaPedro Costa
Pedro Costa
Susana FariaSusana Faria
Susana Faria
Nuno M. NevesNuno M. Neves
Nuno M. Neves

1 April 2016 in Materials Science and Engineering: A
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Flavio BartolomeuFlavio Bartolomeu
Flavio Bartolomeu
Susana FariaSusana Faria
Susana Faria
ÓCÓscar Samuel Novais Carvalho
Óscar Samuel Novais Carvalho
EPE. Pinto
E. Pinto
Nuno AlvesNuno Alves
Nuno Alves
GMG. Miranda
G. Miranda

1 February 2010 in Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Susana FariaSusana Faria
Susana Faria
GSGilda Soromenho
Gilda Soromenho
In most applications, the parameters of a mixture of linear regression models are estimated by maximum likelihood using the expectation maximization (EM) algorithm. In this article, we propose the comparison of three algorithms to compute maximum likelihood estimates of the parameters of these models: the EM algorithm, the classification EM algorithm and the stochastic EM algorithm. The comparison of the three procedures was done through a simulation study of the performance (computational effort, statistical properties of estimators and goodness of fit) of these approaches on simulated data sets. Simulation results show that the choice of the approach depends essentially on the configuration of the true regression lines and the initialization of the algorithms.