Heart failure (HF) is characterized by a progressive clinical course marked by frequent exacerbations and repeated hospitalizations, leading to considerably high morbidity and mortality rates. Patients with HF present with a constellation of bothersome symptoms, which range from physical to psychological and mental manifestations. With the transition to more advanced HF stages, symptoms become increasingly more debilitating, interfere with activities of daily living and disrupt multiple domains of life, including physical functioning, psychological status, emotional state, cognitive function, intimate relationships, lifestyle status, usual role activities, social contact and support. By inflicting profuse limitations in numerous aspects of life, HF exerts a profoundly negative impact on health-related quality of life (HRQOL). It is therefore not surprising that patients with HF display lower levels of HRQOL compared not only to the general healthy population but also to patients suffering from other chronic diseases. On top of this, poor HRQOL in patients with HF becomes an even greater concern considering that it has been associated with unfavorable long-term outcomes and poor prognosis. Nevertheless, HRQOL may differ significantly among patients with HF. Indeed, it has consistently been reported that women with HF display poorer HRQOL compared to men, while younger patients with HF tend to exhibit lower levels of HRQOL than their older counterparts. Moreover, patients presenting with higher New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class (III–IV) have significantly more impaired HRQOL than those in a better NYHA class (I–II). Furthermore, most studies report worse levels of HRQOL in patients suffering from HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) compared to patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) or HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF). Last, but not least, differences in HRQOL have been noted depending on geographic location, with lower HRQOL levels having been recorded in Africa and Eastern Europe and higher in Western Europe in a recent large global study. Based on the observed disparities that have been invariably reported in the literature, this review article aims to provide insight into the underlying differences in HRQOL among patients with HF. Through an overview of currently existing evidence, fundamental differences in HRQOL among patients with HF are analyzed based on sex, age, NYHA functional class, ejection fraction and geographic location or ethnicity.

Cardiogenic shock is a complex syndrome manifesting with distinct phenotypes depending on the severity of the primary cardiac insult and the underlying status. As long as therapeutic interventions fail to divert its unopposed rapid evolution, poor outcomes will continue challenging health care systems. Thus, early recognition in the emergency setting is a priority, in order to avoid delays in appropriate management and to ensure immediate initial stabilization. Since advanced therapeutic strategies and specialized shock centers may provide beneficial support, it seems that directing patients towards the recently described shock network may improve survival rates. A multidisciplinary approach strategy commands the interconnections between the strategic role of the ED in affiliation with cardiac shock centers. This review outlines critical features of early recognition and initial therapeutic management, as well as the utility of diagnostic tools and risk stratification models regarding the facilitation of patient trajectories through the shock network. Further, it proposes the implementation of precise criteria for shock team activation and the establishment of definite exclusion criteria for streaming the right patient to the right place at the right time.

Major bleeding is a life-threatening condition with high morbidity and mortality. Trauma, gastrointestinal bleeding, haemoptysis, intracranial haemorrhage or other causes of bleeding represent major concerns in the Emergency Department (ED), especially when complicated by haemodynamic instability. Severity and source of bleeding, comorbidities, and prior use of anticoagulants are pivotal factors affecting both the clinical status and the patients’ differential response to haemorrhage. Thus, risk stratification is fundamental in the initial assessment of patients with bleeding. Aggressive resuscitation is the principal step for achieving haemodynamic stabilization of the patient, which will further allow appropriate interventions to be made for the definite control of bleeding. Overall management of major bleeding in the ED should follow a holistic individualized approach which includes haemodynamic stabilization, repletion of volume and blood loss, and reversal of coagulopathy and identification of the source of bleeding. The aim of the present practical guide is to provide an update on recent epidemiological data about the most common etiologies of bleeding and summarize the latest evidence regarding the bundles of care for the management of patients with major bleeding of traumatic or non-traumatic etiology in the ED.

Stroke is one of the leading causes of death and disability worldwide and poses a tremendous socioeconomic burden upon individuals, countries and healthcare systems. It causes debilitating symptoms and thus interferes with many aspects of the patient’s life, including physical functioning, cognition, emotional status, activities of daily living, social reintegration and quality of life. Post-stroke patients frequently experience functional motor disabilities of the upper limb, which restrict autonomy and self-efficacy and cause limitations in engagement with activities and social participation, as well as difficulties in performing important occupations. It is therefore not surprising that motor impairment or loss of motor function of the upper limb is one of the most devastating sequelae of stroke. On these grounds, achieving optimal functioning of the upper limb after stroke remains a fundamental goal of stroke rehabilitation. Mirror therapy (MT) represents one of the several rehabilitation techniques used for restoring the upper limb’s motor function after a stroke. However, conflicting results about the role of MT in the rehabilitation of the upper limb’s motor deficits have been reported in the literature. Accordingly, the aim of this narrative review is to summarize existing evidence regarding the effects of MT on the upper limb’s motor function in post-stroke patients and to further explore its role when applied in different phases of stroke.

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia in the emergency department (ED). We investigated the role of N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in predicting both the outcome of AF cardioversion and the risk of AF recurrence or persistence on the 8th (D8) and 30th (D30) day post-cardioversion. Methods: This prospective, observational study evaluated patients with recent-onset AF, managed by either pharmacological (PC) or electrical cardioversion (EC) in the ED. Patients were treated either immediately or electively after 3 weeks of anticoagulation. NT-proBNP assessments were performed prior to cardioversion. Results: Of the 148 patients enrolled, 56% had paroxysmal AF, 85% underwent immediate cardioversion and 72% received EC. Successful cardioversion to sinus rhythm (SR) was achieved in 85% of patients. Patients with successful cardioversion and those who remained free from AF on D8 had lower NT-proBNP levels compared to patients with failed cardioversion or with AF recurrence or persistence on D8 [day of cardioversion, D0: SR vs. non-SR, 387 (127–1095) pg/mL vs. 1262 (595–2295), p = 0.004; D8: SR vs. non-SR, 370 (127–1095) vs. 1366 (718–2295), p = 0.002]. In multivariate analysis, higher logNT-proBNP was associated with higher risk of cardioversion failure [OR, 95%CI: 4.80 (1.58–14.55), p = 0.006] and AF recurrence or persistence on D8 [OR, 95%CI: 3.65 (1.06–12.59), p = 0.041]. ROC analysis confirmed the predictive ability of NT-proBNP for both outcomes (D0: AUC 0.735, p < 0.001; D8: AUC 0.761, p < 0.001). A cut-off value of NT-proBNP > 580 pg/mL was able to predict failure of AF conversion and occurrence of recurrent/persistent AF at D8. Conclusions: NT-proBNP is a promising biomarker for identifying patients presenting to the ED with recent-onset AF who run a greater risk of cardioversion failure and post-discharge AF recurrence/persistence in the immediate and short term.

In the acute cardiac care setting, undifferentiated clinical presentations such as dyspnea, chest pain, shock, and cardiac arrest are common diagnostic challenges for the clinician. Lung ultrasonography is a well-established diagnostic tool which can be integrated in simplified decision making algorithms during the initial approach of the patient, in order to differentiate accurately cardiac from non-cardiac causes and improve the management of time-sensitive cardiovascular emergencies.