Rice (Oryza sativa L.), unlike other cereals, can grow well in paddy fields and is highly tolerant of excess water stress, from either submergence (in which part or all of the plant is under water) or waterlogging (in which excess water in soil limits gas diffusion). Rice handles submergence stress by internal aeration and growth controls. A quiescence strategy based on Submergence-1A (SUB1A) or an escape strategy based on SNORKEL1 (SK1) and SNORKEL2 (SK2) is used for the growth controls. On the other hand, rice handles waterlogging stress by forming lysigenous aerenchyma and a barrier to radial O2 loss (ROL) in roots in order to supply O2 to the root tip. In this article, we summarize recent advances in understanding the mechanisms of responding to excess water stresses (i.e., submergence and waterlogging) in rice and other gramineous plants.
Radial oxygen loss (ROL) and root porosity of rice (Oryza sativa L.) plants grown in either aerated or deoxygenated (stagnant) conditions were combined for the first time with extensive histochemical and biochemical studies of the apoplastic barriers in the roots’ peripheral cell layers. Growth in stagnant solution significantly affected structural and, consequently, the physiological features of rice roots. It increased adventitious root porosity by about 20% and decreased the ROL towards the base to zero at a distance of 40 mm from the apex. By contrast, roots of plants grown in aerated solutions revealed the highest rates of ROL at 30 mm from the apex. Differences in the ROL pattern along the root were related to histochemical studies, which showed an early development of Casparian bands and suberin lamellae in the exodermis, and lignified sclerenchyma cells in roots of plants grown in deoxygenated solution. In agreement with anatomical studies, absolute contents of suberin and lignin in the outer part of the roots (OPR) were higher in plants grown in deoxygenated solution. Regardless of growth conditions, the levels of suberin and lignin increased along the roots towards the base. It is concluded that radial oxygen loss can be effectively restricted by the formation of a suberized exodermis and/or lignified sclerenchyma in the OPR. However, the relative contribution of suberin and lignin in the formation of a tight barrier is unclear. Knowing the permeability coefficient across OPR for roots of plants grown in both conditions will allow a more precise understanding of the mechanisms controlling ROL.
The relative contribution of the apoplastic and cell‐to‐cell paths to the overall hydraulic conductivity of the outer part of rice roots (LpOPR) was estimated using a pressure perfusion technique for 30‐d‐old rice plants (lowland cultivar, IR64, and upland cultivar, Azucena). The technique was based on the perfusion of aerenchyma of root segments from two different zones (20–50 mm and 50–100 mm from the root apex) with aerated nutrient solution using precise pump rates. The outer part of roots (OPR) comprised an outermost rhizodermis, an exodermis, sclerenchyma fibre cells, and the innermost unmodified cortical cell layer. No root anatomical differences were observed for the two cultivars used. Development of apoplastic barriers such as Casparian bands and suberin lamellae in the exodermis were highly variable. On average, matured apoplastic barriers were observed at around 50–70 mm from the root apex. Lignification of the exodermis was completed earlier than that of sclerenchyma cells. Radial water flow across the OPR was impeded either by partially blocking off the porous apoplast with China ink particles (diameter 50 nm) or by closing water channels (aquaporins) in cell membranes with 50 µM HgCl2. The reduction of LpOPR was relatively larger in the presence of an apoplastic blockage with ink (≈30%) than in the presence of the water channel blocker (≈10%) suggesting a relatively larger apoplastic water flow. The reflection coefficient of the OPR (σsOPR) for mannitol significantly increased during both treatments. It was larger when pores of the apoplast were closed, but absolute values were low (overall range of σsOPR=0.1–0.4), which also suggested a large contribution of the non‐selective, apoplastic path to overall water flow. The strongest evidence in favour of a predominantly apoplastic water transport came from the comparison between diffusional (PdOPR, measured with heavy water, HDO) and osmotic water permeability (PfOPR) or hydraulic conductivity (LpOPR). PfOPR was larger by a factor of 600–1400 compared with PdOPR. The development of OPR along roots resulted in a decrease of PdOPR by a factor of three (segments taken at 20–50 and 50–100 mm from root apex, respectively). Heat‐killing of living cells resulted in an increase of PdOPR for both immature (20–50 mm) and mature (50–100 mm) root segments by a factor of two. Even though both pathways (apoplast and cell‐to‐cell) contributed to the overall water flow, the findings indicate predominantly apoplastic water flow across the OPR, even in the presence of apoplastic barriers. Low diffusional water permeabilities may suggest a low rate of oxygen diffusion across the OPR from aerenchyma to the outer anaerobic soil medium (low PO2OPR). To date, there are no data on PO2OPR. Provisional data of radial oxygen losses (ROL) across the OPR suggest that, unlike water, rice roots efficiently retain oxygen within the aerenchyma. This ability strongly increases as roots/OPR develop.