Krzysztof Pilarski

Dr. Krzysztof Pilarski

Department of Biosystems Engineering, Poznań University of Life Sciences, ul. Wojska Polskiego 50, 60-627 Poznań, Poland

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
30 April 2021 in Agronomy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Magdalena PiekutowskaMagdalena Piekutowska
Magdalena Piekutowska
Gniewko NiedbałaGniewko Niedbała
Gniewko Niedbała
TPTomasz Piskier
Tomasz Piskier
TLTomasz Lenartowicz
Tomasz Lenartowicz
Krzysztof PilarskiKrzysztof Pilarski
Krzysztof Pilarski
ACAneta Czechowska-Kosacka
Aneta Czechowska-Kosacka
Yield forecasting is a rational and scientific way of predicting future occurrences in agriculture—the level of production effects. Its main purpose is reducing the risk in the decision-making process affecting the yield in terms of quantity and quality. The aim of the following study was to generate a linear and non-linear model to forecast the tuber yield of three very early potato cultivars: Arielle, Riviera, and Viviana. In order to achieve the set goal of the study, data from the period 2010–2017 were collected, coming from official varietal experiments carried out in northern and northwestern Poland. The linear model has been created based on multiple linear regression analysis (MLR), while the non-linear model has been built using artificial neural networks (ANN). The created models can predict the yield of very early potato varieties on 20th June. Agronomic, phytophenological, and meteorological data were used to prepare the models, and the correctness of their operation was verified on the basis of separate sets of data not participating in the construction of the models. For the proper validation of the model, six forecast error metrics were used: i.e., global relative approximation error (RAE), root mean square error (RMS), mean absolute error (MAE), and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE). As a result of the conducted analyses, the forecast error results for most models did not exceed 15% of MAPE. The predictive neural model NY1 was characterized by better values of quality measures and ex post forecast errors than the regression model RY1.

1 August 2023 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Agnieszka Anna PilarskaAgnieszka Anna Pilarska
Agnieszka Anna Pilarska
TKTomasz Kulupa
Tomasz Kulupa
AKAdrianna Kubiak
Adrianna Kubiak
AWAgnieszka Wolna-Maruwka
Agnieszka Wolna-Maruwka
Krzysztof PilarskiKrzysztof Pilarski
Krzysztof Pilarski
Alicja NiewiadomskaAlicja Niewiadomska
Alicja Niewiadomska
In recent years, growing environmental awareness, the need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and the energy crisis have led many countries to seek alternative energy sources. One of the most promising solutions is biogas production via anaerobic digestion (AD), whose substrate can be organic-rich and easily biodegradable food waste (FW). This waste is a significant part of the global waste problem, and its use for energy production is beneficial to both the environment and the economy. This paper presents important issues concerning the monitoring of the AD process, as well as standard and innovative, for the implementation of this process, technological solutions. The aim of the measures taken to optimise the process is to increase AD efficiency and obtain the highest possible methane content in biogas. Two approaches—pretreatment and anaerobic co-digestion (AcoD)—have been integral to the implementation of AD of food waste for years. They are presented in this paper based on a review of recent research developments. Pretreatment methods are discussed with particular emphasis on mechanical, chemical and biological methods. The AcoD of FW with different organic substrates has been extensively reviewed, as confirmed by numerous studies, where higher buffer capacity and optimum nutrient balance enhance the biogas/methane yields. Attention was also paid to the parameters, operating mode and configurations of anaerobic digesters, with a thorough analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of each solution. The article concludes with a brief presentation of the development perspectives for the discussed FW management method and recommendations.

1 September 2012 in Atmospheric Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PBPiotr Boniecki
Piotr Boniecki
Jacek DachJacek Dach
Jacek Dach
Krzysztof PilarskiKrzysztof Pilarski
Krzysztof Pilarski
HPH. Piekarska-Boniecka
H. Piekarska-Boniecka

24 January 2024 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GGGulnar Gadirli
Gulnar Gadirli
Agnieszka Anna PilarskaAgnieszka Anna Pilarska
Agnieszka Anna Pilarska
Jacek DachJacek Dach
Jacek Dach
Krzysztof PilarskiKrzysztof Pilarski
Krzysztof Pilarski
AKAlicja Kolasa-Więcek
Alicja Kolasa-Więcek
KBKlaudia Borowiak
Klaudia Borowiak
As the global demand for renewable energy continues to rise, biogas production has emerged as a promising solution for sustainable energy generation. This review article presents the advantages of biogas technologies (mainly agricultural, based on waste of animal and plant origin) and extensively discusses the main principles of biogas production in the anaerobic digestion (AD). In this respect, the main parameters of the process, which require monitoring and decisive for its efficiency are described, therefore: temperature, pH value, retention time and organic loading rate (OLR). The principles of substrate selection are also discussed and the necessity and advantages of the use of organic waste according to the model of a circular economy and the concept of sustainable development, are indicated. It is emphasized that according to the new European regulations, the crops classified as food cannot be considered energy crops. The part on biogas production is summarised with an explanation of the necessity to treat and purify biogas. Biogas purification is important from the point of view of the efficiency of its conversion into electricity. A special place in this paper is devoted to the design, construction, functioning and operation of biogas plants, based on both scientific and practical aspects. In conclusion of this chapter, the economic aspects and profitability of operating biogas plants are discussed. Cost and benefit analyses are the major tool used for the systematic evaluation of the financial costs and potential benefits associated with the operation of biogas plants. The important fact is that the return on investment can be achieved within a few years, provided the activities are well-planned and executed. In addition to the fundamental issues of the operation of biogas plants, this article presents the global situation regarding the development of biogas plants, discussing in detail the specific needs and limitations on different continents. It is a interesting and extensive part of this article. The global agricultural biogas market is at very different levels of development. Most such installations are located in Asia and Europe. China has the highest number of biogas plants, with more than 100,000 biogas plants, followed by Germany with over 10,000 plants. In addition to the 100,000 biogas plants, China also has a large number of household biogas units, which gives a total of approx. 40 million operating units. The article concludes with a discussion of opportunities and barriers to the development of biogas plants, pointing to: financial issues, access to feedstock, political regulations, public awareness and the geopolitical situation. The most frequently cited reasons for investment failure include economic problems, lack of professional knowledge.

1 September 2013 in Applied Thermal Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PBPiotr Boniecki
Piotr Boniecki
Jacek DachJacek Dach
Jacek Dach
WMWojciech Mueller
Wojciech Mueller
Krzysztof KoszelaKrzysztof Koszela
Krzysztof Koszela
JPJacek Przybyl
Jacek Przybyl
TOTomasz Olszewski
Tomasz Olszewski

1 December 2013 in Ecological Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KWK.M. Waszkielis
K.M. Waszkielis
RWR. Wronowski
R. Wronowski
WCW. Chlebus
W. Chlebus
IBIreneusz Białobrzewski
Ireneusz Białobrzewski
Jacek DachJacek Dach
Jacek Dach
DJD. Janczak
D. Janczak