The GlideScope^® intubating device has been reported to provide a comparable or superior laryngoscopic view compared with direct laryngoscopy in adults. This study compared the use of the GlideScope^® with direct laryngoscopy for the laryngoscopic view and intubation time in children. The laryngoscopic view in 203 children was scored using both the Macintosh laryngoscope and the GlideScope^® using Cormack and Lehane (C&L) grades. After scoring each laryngoscopic view with and without BURP, the patients were randomly allocated to two groups. The trachea was intubated using direct laryngoscopy (Group DL, n=100) or the GlideScope^® (Group GS, n=103). We compared C&L grades for the two views in the same patient, and also the time to intubate for each group. The GlideScope^® improved the view without BURP in the patients with C&L grade 2 (16/26, P<0.01) and with C&L grades 3 and 4 (7/11, P<0.05). The view with BURP was also improved by the GlideScope^® in C&L grade 2 (4/9, P<0.05) and with C&L grades 3 and 4 (4/5, P=0.059). The mean time for tracheal intubation was 36.0 (17.9) s in the GS group and 23.8 (13.9) s in the DL group (P<0.001). In children, the GlideScope^® provided a laryngoscopic view equal to or better than that of direct laryngoscopy but required a longer time for intubation.

EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE: What We Know about This Topic: IV anesthesia may impair anticancer immunity less than volatile anesthesia and therefore reduce recurrence risk What This Article Tells Us That Is New: In a large propensity-matched retrospective cohort analysis, the authors compared total IV and volatile anesthesia for breast cancer surgery Recurrence hazard was similar with each approach Selection of IV or volatile anesthesia should be based on factors other than cancer recurrence Background: The association between type of anesthesia used and recurrence of cancer remains controversial. This retrospective cohort study compared the influence of total IV anesthesia and inhalation anesthesia on the primary outcome of recurrence-free survival after breast cancer surgery. Methods: The authors reviewed the electronic medical records of patients who had breast cancer surgery at a tertiary care teaching hospital between January 2005 and December 2013. The patients were grouped according to whether IV or inhalation anesthesia was used for surgery. Propensity score matching was used to account for differences in baseline characteristics. Kaplan–Meier survival curves were constructed to evaluate the influence of type of anesthesia on recurrence-free survival and overall survival. The risks of cancer recurrence and all-cause mortality were compared between each type of anesthesia. Results: Of 7,678 patients who had breast cancer surgery during the study period, data for 5,331 patients were available for analysis (IV group, n = 3,085; inhalation group, n = 2,246). After propensity score matching, 1,766 patients remained in each group. Kaplan–Meier survival curves showed that there was no significant difference in recurrence-free survival or overall survival between the two groups, with 5-yr recurrence-free survival rates of 93.2% (95% CI, 91.9 to 94.5) in the IV group and 93.8% (95% CI, 92.6 to 95.1) in the inhalation group. Inhalation anesthesia had no significant impact on recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.69 to 1.32; P = 0.782) or overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.69 to 1.33, P = 0.805) when compared with total IV anesthesia. Conclusions: The authors found no association between type of anesthesia used and the long-term prognosis of breast cancer. The results of this retrospective cohort study do not suggest specific selection of IV or inhalation anesthesia for breast cancer surgery.

Summary: Atelectasis occurs in the majority of children undergoing general anaesthesia. Lung ultrasound has shown reliable sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing anaesthesia‐induced atelectasis. We assessed the effects of a recruitment manoeuvre on atelectasis using lung ultrasound in infants undergoing general anaesthesia. Forty infants, randomly allocated to either a recruitment manoeuvre group or a control group, received volume‐controlled ventilation with 5 cmH ₂ O positive end‐expiratory pressure. Lung ultrasound examination was performed twice in each patient, the first a minute after starting mechanical ventilation of the lungs and the second at the end of surgery. Patients in the recruitment manoeuvre group received ultrasound‐guided recruitment manoeuvres after each lung ultrasound examination. The incidence of significant anaesthesia‐induced atelectasis at the second lung ultrasound examination was less in the recruitment manoeuvre group compared with the control group (25% vs. 80%; p = 0.001; odds ratio ( OR ) 0.083; 95% confidence interval ( CI ): 0.019–0.370). The median ( IQR [range]) lung ultrasound scores for consolidation and B‐lines on the second examination were lower in the recruitment manoeuvre group compared with the control group; 6.0 (3.0–9.3 [0.0–14.0]) vs. 13.5 (11.0–16.5 [8.0–23.0]); p < 0.001 and 6.5 (3.0–12.0 [0.0–28.0]) vs. 15.0 (10.8–20.5 [7.0–28.0]); p < 0.001, respectively. The lung ultrasound scores for consolidation on the first and second examinations showed a negative correlation with age (r = −0.340, p = 0.008; r = −0.380, p = 0.003). We conclude that ultrasound‐guided recruitment manoeuvres with positive end‐expiratory pressure proved useful in reducing the incidence of anaesthesia‐induced atelectasis in infants, although 5 cmH ₂ O positive end‐expiratory pressure alone was not sufficient to eliminate it. In addition, the younger the patient, the more susceptible they were to atelectasis.

Background: The purpose of this study was to analyze the position of the conus medullaris and Tuffier's line in the same patient population, to correlate this position with age and sex, and to determine an objective guide for the selection of a safe intervertebral space during spinal block. Methods: Magnetic resonance imaging studies of the lumbar spine were reviewed in 690 consecutive patients. The study population consisted of patients older than 20 yr who had been referred for imaging to assess possible causes of low back pain. The position of the conus medullaris was defined as the most distal point of the cord that could be visualized on the sagittal sequence. A line perpendicular to the long axis of the cord was extended to the adjacent vertebra. In the lumbar plain films, the Tuffier's line was defined by drawing a horizontal line across the highest points of the iliac crests. Each vertebral body and intervertebral space was divided into four segments: upper, middle, and lower thirds of a vertebral body, and the intervertebral space. Each segment of a vertebral body or intervertebral space that the lines crossed was identified and recorded. The positions, stratified by decade of age, were compared using analysis of variance. The Tukey test was used for post hoc comparisons. Comparisons between sex were performed with the unpaired t test. Results: The conus medullaris and Tuffier's line (median [range]) were positioned at L1-lower (T12-upper-L3-upper) and L4L5 (L3L4-L5S1), respectively. The distance between the conus medullaris and Tuffier's line (mean +/- SD [range]) was 12.6 +/- 1.9 [7-18] segments, which corresponded to the height of approximately three vertebral bodies and intervertebral spaces. In no case did Tuffier's line overlap with the conus medullaris. The distance in segments between the conus medullaris and Tuffier's line was shorter with increased age (P < 0.001). The position of the conus medullaris and Tuffier's line was lower in female patients than in male patients (P < 0.001) and higher in patients with sacralization than in those with lumbarization or without transitional vertebra (P < 0.001). The in-between distances were not significantly different regardless of sex or presence of transitional vertebra. Conclusions: During spinal block, there seems to be a safety margin of 2-4 vertebral bodies and intervertebral spaces between the conus medullaris and Tuffier's line, which is consistent regardless of sex or presence of transitional vertebra. However, because the conus medullaris and Tuffier's line become closer with age and the clinical use of Tuffier's line requires palpation through subcutaneous fat, caution must be exercised regarding selection of the intervertebral space, especially in the aged and obese population.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical usefulness of static and dynamic variables for the prediction of fluid responsiveness in children under general anaesthesia. Thirty-three mechanically ventilated children received 10 ml kg(-1) colloid for 10 min while stable during surgery. Arterial pressure, heart rate, central venous pressure (CVP), and pleth variability index (PVI), in addition to variation in systolic pressure, pulse pressure (including Δdown and Δup), respiratory aortic blood flow velocity (ΔVpeak), and inferior vena cava diameter were measured before and after volume expansion. Patients were classified as responders to fluid loading if their stroke volume index (SVI) increased by at least 10%. There were 15 volume responders and 18 non-responders. Of the variables examined, ΔVpeak (r=0.516, P=0.004) and PVI (r=0.49, P=0.004) before volume expansion were significantly correlated with changes in SVI. The receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that PVI and ΔVpeak predicted fluid responsiveness. Areas under the ROC curves of PVI and ΔVpeak were statistically larger than that of CVP (P=0.006 and 0.014, respectively). However, those of other variables were similar to that of CVP. ΔVpeak and PVI can be used to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated children under general anaesthesia. The other static and dynamic variables assessed in this study were not found to predict fluid responsiveness significantly in children. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01364103.

Ultrasound (US)-guided subclavian vein (SCV) catheterization via the supraclavicular (SC) or infraclavicular (IC) approaches can be useful in children. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of these approaches. This prospective, randomized study included 98 children who were 3) were more frequently required in the IC group than the SC group (24.5 vs 6.1%, P=0.01). The incidence of guidewire misplacement was higher in the IC group than that of the SC group [10 (20.4%) vs 0 (0%), P=0.001]. Catheterization was successfully performed in all patients. No pneumothoraces or arterial punctures occurred in either group. During SCV catheterization under US guidance in paediatric patients, the SC approach yielded a shorter puncture time and decreased the incidence of guidewire misplacement when compared with the IC approach.