No definitive conclusion could be reached about the role of chemotherapy in adjunction of embolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aim to compare radiological response, toxicity and long-term outcomes of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated by trans-arterial bland embolization (TAE) versus trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE). We retrospectively included 265 patients with HCC treated by a first session of TACE or TAE in two centers. Clinical and biological features were recorded before the treatment and radiological response was assessed after the first treatment using modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) criteria. Correlation between the treatment and overall, progression-free and transplantation-free survival was performed after adjustment using a propensity score matching: 86 patients were treated by bland embolization and 179 patients by TACE, including 44 patients with drug-eluting beads and 135 with lipiodol TACE, 89.8% of patients were male with a median age of 65 years old. Cirrhosis was present in 90.9% of patients with a Child Pugh score A in 84% of cases. After adjustment, no difference in the rate of AE, including liver failure, was observed between the two treatments. TACE was associated with a significant increase in complete radiological response (odds ratio (OR) = 8.5 (95% confidence interval (CI): 2.8–25.4)) but not in the overall response rate (OR = 2.2 (95% CI = 0.8–5.8)). No difference in terms of overall survival (p = 0.3905), progression-free survival (p = 0.4478) and transplantation-free survival (p = 0.9020) was observed between TACE and TAE. TACE was associated with a higher rate of complete radiological response but without any impact on overall radiological response, progression-free survival and overall survival compared to TAE.

(1) Introduction: Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the most widely used treatment for intermediate hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), with limited data available in elderly patients. This study compares the safety and efficacy of TACE for HCC in elderly patients (≥70 years) versus younger patients (<70 years). (2) Materials and Methods: Patients treated by a first TACE for HCC at Grenoble-Alpes University Hospital from January 2012 to March 2017 were included. The primary objective was to compare the safety and predictive factors of serious adverse events between groups using univariate and multivariate analyses. Secondary objectives included tumor response and survival analyses. (3) Results: 271 patients were included: 88 elderly and 183 under 70 years. A total of 20.5% of elderly patients experienced serious adverse events versus 21.3% of patients under 70 (p = 0.87). The predictive factors of serious adverse events were Child–Pugh ≥ B7 (p < 0.0001), ECOG ≥ 1 (p = 0.0019), and MELD ≥ 9 (p = 0.0415). The serious adverse event rate was not increased with age (p = 0.87). The objective tumor response rate was 89.5% in elderly versus 78.7% in younger patients (p = 0.03). (4) Conclusion: This study showed similar safety profiles of the first TACE between elderly and younger patients, with comparable efficacy outcomes, suggesting that advanced age should not constitute a limitation in itself in treatment decision-making.